On Jun 15, 2012, at 12:32 PM, Charlie Brady wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Matt Simerson wrote:
>
>>> In my experience, reverse DNS is frequently managed (or, frequently, not
>>> managed) by an ISP, not by the admin of the mail server.
>>
>> In my experience, every ISP that provides clients wit
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Matt Simerson wrote:
> > In my experience, reverse DNS is frequently managed (or, frequently, not
> > managed) by an ISP, not by the admin of the mail server.
>
> In my experience, every ISP that provides clients with dedicated IPs
> also provides the client with the abili
On Jun 15, 2012, at 6:44 AM, Charlie Brady wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, Matt Simerson wrote:
>
>> https://github.com/smtpd/qpsmtpd/pull/29
>
> I consider this statement to be troublesome also:
>
> Per RFC 2821, the HELO hostname must be the FQDN of the sending server or
> address literal.
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, Matt Simerson wrote:
> https://github.com/smtpd/qpsmtpd/pull/29
I consider this statement to be troublesome also:
Per RFC 2821, the HELO hostname must be the FQDN of the sending server or
address literal.
RFC 2821 doesn't say "must". It says neither should nor must, bu
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, Matt Simerson wrote:
> https://github.com/smtpd/qpsmtpd/pull/29
Make sure the HELO hostname has an A or record that matches the senders
IP address, and make sure that the senders IP has a PTR that resolves to the
HELO hostname.
This might sound pedantic, but since
