On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 18:48:00 +0200
"Peter J. Holzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > + $self->respond(250, $from->format . ", sender OK - your transaction
> > id is ".$self->transaction->id);
> I like that, although I suspect that most clients will just discard it.
But some clients show the t
On 2007-08-23 18:50:33 +0200, Hanno Hecker wrote:
> But it would be easy to add / generate a transaction id after every
> reset_transaction() call. This could be logged instead of (or as
> addition to) the PID.
[...]
> Index: lib/Qpsmtpd/SMTP.pm
> ==
On 2007-08-22 21:44:26 +0200, Sydney Bogaert wrote:
> >
> > I wrote some small helper scripts for parsing logs. Would they be
> > useful enough to include in qpsmtpd?
> >
> >
> > --
> > JT Moree
>
> You assume here that the process numbers are different for each message.
> While it will work f
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:48:09 -0700
JT Moree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sydney Bogaert wrote:
> > You assume here that the process numbers are different for each message.
> > While it will work for forkserver and tcpserver, that is not the case
> > with prefork or Apache (also preforking).
>
> Is
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 13:06 -0700, James W. Abendschan wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Sydney Bogaert wrote:
>
> > You assume here that the process numbers are different for each message.
> > While it will work for forkserver and tcpserver, that is not the case
> > with prefork or Apache (also prefo
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Sydney Bogaert wrote:
> You assume here that the process numbers are different for each message.
> While it will work for forkserver and tcpserver, that is not the case
> with prefork or Apache (also preforking).
related: is there any work being done on standardizing qpsmtpd
Sydney Bogaert wrote:
>> I wrote some small helper scripts for parsing logs. Would they be
>> useful enough to include in qpsmtpd?
>>
> You assume here that the process numbers are different for each message.
> While it will work for forkserver and tcpserver, that is not the case
> with prefork or
>
> I wrote some small helper scripts for parsing logs. Would they be
> useful enough to include in qpsmtpd?
>
>
> --
> JT Moree
You assume here that the process numbers are different for each message.
While it will work for forkserver and tcpserver, that is not the case
with prefork or Apache
