On 9-May-08, at 3:30 PM, Hanno Hecker wrote:
On Fri, 9 May 2008 13:51:17 -0400
Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9-May-08, at 1:45 PM, Hanno Hecker wrote:
Someone more into -async has to do this for async (and apache?!).
Any
reason why there's no post-connection hook for -async/a
On Fri, 9 May 2008 13:51:17 -0400
Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9-May-08, at 1:45 PM, Hanno Hecker wrote:
>
> > Someone more into -async has to do this for async (and apache?!). Any
> > reason why there's no post-connection hook for -async/apache?
>
> Laziness :-D
I see :)
Would
On 9-May-08, at 1:45 PM, Hanno Hecker wrote:
Someone more into -async has to do this for async (and apache?!). Any
reason why there's no post-connection hook for -async/apache?
Laziness :-D
On Thu, 8 May 2008 23:13:17 -0700
Ask Bjørn Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 8, 2008, at 10:54 PM, Hanno Hecker wrote:
>
> [Adding connection->reset]
> > This also works, with no workaround in plugins/tls. Matt, Ask: Ok to
> > commit this and remove the tls-prefork workaround (maybe also
On May 8, 2008, at 10:54 PM, Hanno Hecker wrote:
[Adding connection->reset]
This also works, with no workaround in plugins/tls. Matt, Ask: Ok to
commit this and remove the tls-prefork workaround (maybe also undef
any
transaction notes)?
As long as you are sure the reset method gets called
