Re: release

2012-06-21 Thread Devin Carraway
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 03:00:27PM -0700, Matt Simerson wrote: > What is the process for releasing a new version of qpsmtpd? And, tangentially: Debian has announced that it's freezing Wheezy on the 30th. There's been a ton of changes in the last couple of months, and I haven't kept close watch on

Re: Release soon

2010-04-07 Thread Kjetil Kjernsmo
On Saturday 13. February 2010 06:53:12 Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote: > I'm going to make a release soon, so if you have patches that aren't > merged into my branch yet that you think should be, > BTW, it seems like Debian is going to freeze RSN, and I kinda prefer to have my production mail server on

Re: Release soon

2010-02-16 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote: Hi everyone, I'm going to make a release soon, so if you have patches that aren't merged into my branch yet that you think should be, be sure to speak up! I just merged the RPM packaging stuff Peter Holzer and Robin Bowes made (over the last 5 yea

Re: Release soon

2010-02-14 Thread Richard Siddall
Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote: Hi everyone, I'm going to make a release soon, so if you have patches that aren't merged into my branch yet that you think should be, be sure to speak up! I just merged the RPM packaging stuff Peter Holzer and Robin Bowes made (over the last 5 years; don't say anything i

Re: Release tweak suggestion.

2008-07-04 Thread m. allan noah
yes, please on the first two. i would leave the last one LOGALERT, but that case does not happen that often for me... allan On 7/4/08, Chris Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can we please, pretty please, downgrade these messages: > > $self->log(LOGALERT, "from email address : [$from]"); > $se

Re: Release?

2008-06-04 Thread Hanno Hecker
On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:11:21 -0400 Guy Hulbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-04-06 at 19:47 +0200, Hanno Hecker wrote: > > On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:10:13 -0400 > > Guy Hulbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Actually, what I meant by 'pointer' was somewhere prominent on the wiki > > > b

Re: Release?

2008-06-04 Thread Guy Hulbert
On Wed, 2008-04-06 at 19:47 +0200, Hanno Hecker wrote: > On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:10:13 -0400 > Guy Hulbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Actually, what I meant by 'pointer' was somewhere prominent on the wiki > > before the release as I've seen many questions about -async and '* > > notes' on the l

Re: Release?

2008-06-04 Thread Hanno Hecker
On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:10:13 -0400 Guy Hulbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually, what I meant by 'pointer' was somewhere prominent on the wiki > before the release as I've seen many questions about -async and '* > notes' on the list. However, I suppose that the wiki already has Write a .pod a

Re: Release?

2008-06-04 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
On Jun 4, 2008, at 4:26 AM, John Peacock wrote: We need to make sure the Changes file is up-to-date. - ask -- http://develooper.com/ - http://askask.com/

Re: Release?

2008-06-04 Thread Guy Hulbert
On Wed, 2008-04-06 at 17:03 +0200, Hanno Hecker wrote: > On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 09:47:43 -0400 > Guy Hulbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2008-04-06 at 23:42 +1000, James Turnbull wrote: > > A pointer to 'transaction notes' versus 'connection notes' and when and > > how to use them when w

Re: Release?

2008-06-04 Thread Hanno Hecker
On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 09:47:43 -0400 Guy Hulbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-04-06 at 23:42 +1000, James Turnbull wrote: > A pointer to 'transaction notes' versus 'connection notes' and when and > how to use them when writing plugins would be a big help.[...] perldoc docs/plugins.pod

Re: Release?

2008-06-04 Thread Guy Hulbert
On Wed, 2008-04-06 at 23:42 +1000, James Turnbull wrote: > Again my contribution is going to be merely a: > > +1 > > But happy to update wiki etc with new release guff. A pointer to 'transaction notes' versus 'connection notes' and when and how to use them when writing plugins would be a big he

Re: Release?

2008-06-04 Thread James Turnbull
John Peacock wrote: > Are we at a state where we could release? I'd like to get Net::SMTP::ESMTP > released before OSCON (so I can do a lightning talk on it), but I rely on an > installed qpsmtpd instance for the test suite (go figure, you need an MTA to > test a SMTP client). > > Anything I c

Re: Release

2008-03-18 Thread Matt Sergeant
On 18-Mar-08, at 9:53 AM, Matt Sergeant wrote: On 14-Mar-08, at 9:48 AM, Matt Sergeant wrote: Ask and Matt What's the current release status of qpsmtpd? The SVN is tagged 0.43 but the latest on the website seems to be 0.40. Time for a release and announce? Sounds like a plan. In cas

Re: Release

2008-03-18 Thread Matt Sergeant
On 14-Mar-08, at 9:48 AM, Matt Sergeant wrote: Ask and Matt What's the current release status of qpsmtpd? The SVN is tagged 0.43 but the latest on the website seems to be 0.40. Time for a release and announce? Sounds like a plan. In case anyone (well, Ask) was thinking about cutting a

Re: Release

2008-03-14 Thread Matt Sergeant
On 14-Mar-08, at 4:54 AM, James Turnbull wrote: Ask and Matt What's the current release status of qpsmtpd? The SVN is tagged 0.43 but the latest on the website seems to be 0.40. Time for a release and announce? Sounds like a plan.

Re: Release (Re: How to configure stunnel Ver. 4)

2007-05-29 Thread Matt Sergeant
On 29-May-07, at 8:20 AM, James Turnbull wrote: What does that spell? Release! :) Yeah I think we just need to update Changes (it's gonna be a long one!)