On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 16:55 -0500, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Guy Hulbert wrote:
> >> > https://github.com/baudehlo/Haraka
> >>
> >
> > Had a look. I recognize bits. Do you have any feeling for how easy
> it
> > is to code versus perl
>
> Once you get used to the idiosyncrasies of Javascript,
a perl six in javascript exists, or existed until its author found a new
distraction -- called "sprixel" -- that could be used to leverage CPAN into
node.js through some kind of intermediate perl-in-js layer
Matt Simerson wrote:
Is qpsmtpd often the bottleneck?
It depends on the plugins. A number of us use Qpsmtpd as a spamtrap sink
- for those purposes, the answer is "Perhaps".
I should think that the external plugins (clamav, spamassassin, etc) would
be the most significant bottlenecks?
Guy Hulbert wrote:
> https://github.com/baudehlo/Haraka
Had a look. I recognize bits. Do you have any feeling for how easy it
is to code versus perl
Once you get used to the idiosyncrasies of Javascript, just as easy
really. Took me a while to understand the object model, but everyt
On Mar 12, 2011, at 12:48 PM, Guy Hulbert wrote:
>> So to do that I have basically ported Qpsmtpd to Node.js (and given it a
>> decent name while doing so!).
>>
>> It's still early days - there are no plugins to speak of yet (i.e. no
>> queue plugins at all yet), but you might be interested in
On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 13:14 -0500, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Some of you may be interested in this...
>
> I decided I wanted to hack on node.js to see what all the fuss is about.
I saw a good video introduction a while back ... got busy and forgot
about it. Some of the "fuss" was that it should be
