Re: Confusion about allowing missing MAIL FROM

2010-10-13 Thread Glen Barber
On 10/13/10 5:54 PM, Peter J. Holzer wrote: > On 2010-10-11 20:34:10 -0400, Glen Barber wrote: >> I saw something in my qpsmtpd.log this evening which struck me as >> unusual. In one particular incoming message, the MAIL FROM was not >> there. A quick telnet session reproducing it follows, follow

Re: Confusion about allowing missing MAIL FROM

2010-10-13 Thread Peter J. Holzer
On 2010-10-11 20:34:10 -0400, Glen Barber wrote: > I saw something in my qpsmtpd.log this evening which struck me as > unusual. In one particular incoming message, the MAIL FROM was not > there. A quick telnet session reproducing it follows, followed by the > list of active plugins. > > I'm not

Re: Confusion about allowing missing MAIL FROM

2010-10-12 Thread Glen Barber
On 10/11/10 8:34 PM, Glen Barber wrote: > Hello list, > > I saw something in my qpsmtpd.log this evening which struck me as > unusual. In one particular incoming message, the MAIL FROM was not > there. A quick telnet session reproducing it follows, followed by the > list of active plugins. > >

Confusion about allowing missing MAIL FROM

2010-10-11 Thread Glen Barber
Hello list, I saw something in my qpsmtpd.log this evening which struck me as unusual. In one particular incoming message, the MAIL FROM was not there. A quick telnet session reproducing it follows, followed by the list of active plugins. I'm not aware of there being a good reason for allowing