Re: ident/p0f plugin

2009-04-01 Thread Tom Callahan
Oops, disregard that, I was silly. Too much copy paste with not enough attention paid to what I was doing ;) Please let me know if this one looks better (I tested it, it too works and should fail more gracefully). Thanks, Tom Tom Callahan wrote: I just did the minimal modification to get

Re: ident/p0f plugin

2009-04-01 Thread Tom Callahan
I just did the minimal modification to get it working with the new p0f API (it does indeed work for me); theoretically it should be roughly as complete as the old p0f plugin. In the interests of completeness I'll fix it up and send in a better version though. Thanks, Tom Robert Spier

ident/p0f plugin

2009-03-31 Thread Tom Callahan
I think it was discussed on list some time ago that the p0f plugin no longer worked with new versions of p0f but no one pushed the new plugin version out to the list and/or updated it in git. Attached version has been modified based on the more recent version of pofq.pl and so should work. Tom

Re: Next steps to release?

2008-05-07 Thread Tom Callahan
Has anyone gotten an async mysql-querying-type plugin working yet? That's the only thing I can think of yet that would block if I moved to async. Thanks for getting smtp-forward working btw, I didn't even know you'd thrown it out in svn. Tom P.S. Doh, accidentally hit reply an

Re: References/In-Reply-To delivery plugin

2008-05-06 Thread Tom Callahan
and don't invoke spamassassin and it seems to be working pretty well. Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, First of all, thanks to qpsmtpd developer and contributor. It really simplify my mail configuration/test about anti-spam. I want to develop a new plugin based on the queue/maildir plugin

accessing client socket state from plugin?

2007-12-21 Thread tom
ss the actual socket object of the incoming client connection, so that I could check if it's still valid, like if($socket) {...} or somethink like that? kind regards, Tom PS: I already developed some new plugins, where could I publish them?

Re: Error running on Windows

2007-12-15 Thread Tom Callahan
Charles Haven wrote: Complete noob here. I use ASSP on Windows and want to pass the smtp connection to another daemon running Perl. This looks like the best possibility. I have: - Windows XP - Perl v5.8.8 built for MSWin32-x86-multi-thread, Binary build 822 [280952] provided by ActiveState -

For purposes of comparison

2007-10-03 Thread Tom Callahan
to eventually queue this to a postfix installation? In addition, do these figures line up with anyone else's? This is v4 of qpsmtpd-async running on a dual 2.8ghz xeon with 4gb of ram with -j 4 (and it beats on the cpu pretty good during the stress tests). Thanks all, Tom Callahan

Re: Future of the wiki in 2007?

2007-01-04 Thread Tom Smith
Guy Hulbert wrote: On Thu, 2007-04-01 at 08:22 -0700, Tom Smith wrote: You may want to try etch. I expect to type: apt-get install twiki Ubuntu 6.06 LTS is gcc4--versions before that were not. All of the extra Perl modules I needed on 6.06 were installable via apt--only

Re: Future of the wiki in 2007?

2007-01-04 Thread Tom Smith
Michael Holzt wrote: I guess I would vote for Twiki if we were changing. Sorry, twiki isn't going to be installed on _any_ machine controlled by me. twiki has a bad history of (overly stupid!) security incidents and its main developer (Peter Thoeny) has reacted very unfriendly and also u

Re: Future of the wiki in 2007?

2007-01-04 Thread Tom Smith
Guy Hulbert wrote: On Thu, 2007-04-01 at 07:58 -0700, Tom Smith wrote: The largest installation woes... - Perl modules--most are part of standard Perl, but some had to be added CPAN is your friend ... but it's getting to be a bit of a monster. My strategy is to use it for a

Re: Future of the wiki in 2007?

2007-01-04 Thread Tom Smith
Robin Bowes wrote: Guy Hulbert wrote: There are better python wikis than trac. In particular moin-moin is quite close to the present docu-wiki. Moin-moin versus trac: http://www.wikimatrix.org/compare/MoinMoin+TracWiki Trac is missing a lot. I don't entirely disagree, but trac is m

Re: Future of the wiki in 2007?

2007-01-04 Thread Tom Smith
Arnaud ASSAD wrote: I'd also like to keep the wiki. To my mind, the tool is ok, We (In fact I should use 'I') only have to contribute more. There is, for example, a lot of knowledge on the ML which has not be put back on the wiki. One could also at how to create a mailing list archive with

Re: Future of the wiki in 2007?

2007-01-04 Thread Tom Smith
Guy Hulbert wrote: On Thu, 2007-04-01 at 07:43 -0500, Guy Hulbert wrote: I guess I would vote for Twiki if we were changing. It seems that the latest twiki will be in etch and I have been planning to upgrade my server anyway. My thoughts have changed a bit since looking at the

Re: Future of the wiki in 2007?

2007-01-04 Thread Tom Smith
James Turnbull wrote: Michael Holzt wrote: the page which is easily confused with a real navigation). So if one has better suggestions (i would also like to get rid of the security nightmare also known as php), i would like to hear about it. My preference is TWiki - stable, powerful, e

Re: Blocking email with a date older than "x" days

2006-11-04 Thread Tom Smith
Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote: On Nov 4, 2006, at 12:48, Tom Smith wrote: Now don't get me wrong, qmail is also a great product. But qpsmtpd being tied to it in such a way limits its use. There isn't anything in "core qpsmtpd" that's tied to qmail. I think qpsmtpd would

Re: Blocking email with a date older than "x" days

2006-11-04 Thread Tom Smith
Charlie Brady wrote: On Sat, 4 Nov 2006, Tom Smith wrote: For example, what if it were /just/ a proxy. That is, it listens on port 25 and forwards the SMTP conversation to the local SMTP server while monitoring the chat. If it detects something wrong, like a positive dnsbl detection or a

Re: Blocking email with a date older than "x" days

2006-11-04 Thread Tom Smith
Sydney Bogaert wrote: Yeah, I think qpsmtpd is a great program. But I think it can be much better and much more versatile than it already is. My biggest issue with it is its ties to qmail. It is a long time ago that you didn't read the homepage of qpsmtpd. Qpsmtpd isn't tied wi

Re: Blocking email with a date older than "x" days

2006-11-04 Thread Tom Smith
Charlie Brady wrote: On Sat, 4 Nov 2006, Tom Smith wrote: I've tried a number of programs to stop spam, some worked better than others... But all have their cons. I have yet to find something that I'm totally satisfied with. You'd surprise us enormously if you said anything

Re: Blocking email with a date older than "x" days

2006-11-04 Thread Tom Smith
Hans Sandsdalen wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev: Tom Smith writes: Is it safe to assume that most MTAs will give up trying after four or five days if a message is still undeliverable, even if it's getting a temporary error? (The spam I referred to is dated in 2003, but I don't wan

Re: Blocking email with a date older than "x" days

2006-11-03 Thread Tom Smith
Peter J. Holzer wrote: On 2006-11-03 11:23:00 -0700, Tom Smith wrote: I'm using qpsmtpd 0.32 with daemontools. I recall seeing (somewhere) that qpsmtpd has the ability to block email that is more than a certain age old. At the time, this wasn't an issue so I didn't pay much

Blocking email with a date older than "x" days

2006-11-03 Thread Tom Smith
dated more than 10 years old. Is there a way to stop this with qpsmtpd? ~ Tom