On Jun 29, 2012, at 1:53 PM, David Nicol wrote:
>> Calling all forks.
>>
>> If you have a fork of QP and would like to become much less forked, or
>> perhaps even be able to use QP without being forked at all, this would be a
>> great time to bring out your fork.
>
> Should one add plugins? P
> Calling all forks.
>
> If you have a fork of QP and would like to become much less forked, or
> perhaps even be able to use QP without being forked at all, this would be a
> great time to bring out your fork.
Should one add plugins? Perhaps as placeholder files referring to
where to get the ge
On Jun 29, 2012, at 12:11 PM, Jared Johnson wrote:
>>> At any rate, if a branch like this exists and someone else had the time
>>> and motivation to do the leg work of applying enhancements from the
>>> various forks to the core branch, I would most definitely ask my employers
>>> to put most of
>> At any rate, if a branch like this exists and someone else had the time
>> and motivation to do the leg work of applying enhancements from the
>> various forks to the core branch, I would most definitely ask my
>> employers
>> to put most of our codebase at your disposal to do this. Even if the
