Re: smtp proxy to external smtp server

2011-05-20 Thread Jared Johnson
> On 05/20/2011 02:56 PM, Jared Johnson wrote: >> We do the sort of signing that is a huge doozy, and Matt is right, it's >> a >> doozy :) There are a couple of ways we've accomplished re-writing the >> body from a MIME::Entity. Honestly it seems a bit non-standard to me > Why do you think this i

Re: smtp proxy to external smtp server

2011-05-20 Thread Mike Korizek
On 05/20/2011 02:56 PM, Jared Johnson wrote: > We do the sort of signing that is a huge doozy, and Matt is right, it's a > doozy :) There are a couple of ways we've accomplished re-writing the > body from a MIME::Entity. Honestly it seems a bit non-standard to me Why do you think this is non-stan

Re: smtp proxy to external smtp server

2011-05-20 Thread Jared Johnson
We do the sort of signing that is a huge doozy, and Matt is right, it's a doozy :) There are a couple of ways we've accomplished re-writing the body from a MIME::Entity. Honestly it seems a bit non-standard to me but we have some special requirements, like leaving the original body around; I coul