Re: [qmailtoaster] Filtering: procmail, maildrop, other?

2020-09-03 Thread Eric Broch
That CRM-114 doesn't look to difficult, and they have a maildrop formula. On 9/3/2020 8:37 AM, Angus McIntyre wrote: Yeah, it's definitely out of EPEL 8, as far as I can tell. Looking around for other filtering solutions, I came across rspamd (https://www.rspamd.com/), which I'd never even hea

Re: [qmailtoaster] Filtering: procmail, maildrop, other?

2020-09-03 Thread Eric Broch
Yes, I've been looking at rspamd myself. There's a patch to simscan in the comments on Roberto's Qmail Notes I was thinking about implementing. Of course it could be implemented like Dspam as well, but it's always better that garbage not make it into the queue. Eric On 9/3/2020 8:37 AM, Angus

Re: [qmailtoaster] Filtering: procmail, maildrop, other?

2020-09-03 Thread Angus McIntyre
Yeah, it's definitely out of EPEL 8, as far as I can tell. Looking around for other filtering solutions, I came across rspamd (https://www.rspamd.com/), which I'd never even heard of, and MailScanner (https://www.mailscanner.info/). There's also bogofilter (https://bogofilter.sourceforge.io/),

Re: [qmailtoaster] Filtering: procmail, maildrop, other?

2020-09-03 Thread Eric Broch
It doesn't look like dspam is in the EPEL repo for CentOS 8--may be wrong, I might have to do some contorting. It's really the only thing that's kept the inbox clean. Will do some investigation and get back to you. Eric On 9/3/2020 7:37 AM, Angus McIntyre wrote: Thanks, Eric. I notice that

Re: [qmailtoaster] Filtering: procmail, maildrop, other?

2020-09-03 Thread Angus McIntyre
Thanks, Eric. I notice that this is for CentOS 5 thru 7. dspam is no longer included in EPEL 8, so I assume some sleight of hand is needed to get it onto a CentOS 8 system. How much more complex is it to get dspam working on CentOS 8, on a scale from "You just have to change this one thing"