Re: [qmailtoaster] DKIM and SPF configurations

2019-09-30 Thread Remo Mattei
Agree with Eric. Not many are using DMARC. I also have it on my Spamassassin config. Remo > On Sep 28, 2019, at 10:28, Eric Broch > wrote: > > Hi Gary, > > If you have spf, and dkim set up the only other thing you might do is add a > dmarc record and make sure

Re: [qmailtoaster] spam folder into gmail

2019-09-30 Thread Eric Broch
Also, I've decided to allow Spamassassin to do DKIM (and other) checks so don't have to code anything. go to page: https://www.skelleton.net/2015/03/21/how-to-eliminate-spam-and-protect-your-name-with-dmarc/ and search for: Know your Spam – get the most out of Spamassassin On 9/30/2019 6:

Re: [qmailtoaster] dovecot CVE-2019-11500

2019-09-30 Thread Eric Broch
Correct On 9/30/2019 4:38 AM, Angus McIntyre wrote: I think Eric is saying that the version in the testing repository -- which, as you said, is 2.3.7.2 -- fixes the vulnerability. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-u

Re: [qmailtoaster] spam folder into gmail

2019-09-30 Thread Eric Broch
I've removed DomainKeys (not DKIM) from qmail altogether in later versions and decided to use a wrapper for DKIM. So, If you have below list from /var/qmail/bin # ls -l /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue.orig /var/qmail/bin/qmail-dk -rws--x--x 1 qmailq qmail 52096 Jan 21 

Re: [qmailtoaster] dovecot CVE-2019-11500

2019-09-30 Thread Angus McIntyre
I think Eric is saying that the version in the testing repository -- which, as you said, is 2.3.7.2 -- fixes the vulnerability. The relevant part of the CVE-2019-11500 report -- which Eric quoted in his message, with the key words emphasized -- says that this vulnerability exists in versions o

Re: [qmailtoaster] dovecot CVE-2019-11500

2019-09-30 Thread Ionut Hoza
Hi Eric, I don't think I understand your answer :). I'll try to upgrade to the package available in testing inventory. Thanks, I. On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 5:36 PM Eric Broch wrote: > In Dovecot before 2.2.36.4 and 2.3.x *before* 2.3.7.2 (and Pigeonhole > before 0.5.7.2), protocol processing ca