RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]SMTP error code

2004-05-11 Thread Dallas L. Engelken
> > As you surely know, a 5xx is sent back to the return-path, and it is > almost always faked... > True, but you are issuing a 550 to the sending server, which in turn is responsible for delivery of the MAILER-DAEMON to the return-path. Your server is not sending the non-deliverable, therefor

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]SMTP error code

2004-05-11 Thread Dallas L. Engelken
> > In order to get error codes that mean something, instead of > '451 qq temp > fail', you'll need to recompile qmail/netqmail. > And since we are talking about permanent failures, that should have said "551 mail server permanently rejected message" where exit code is 31. -

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]SMTP error code

2004-05-11 Thread toribio
> Hello list and Jason Haar, > > A discussion on a local mailing list here > raised an interesting point regarding the > new psender functionality in qmail-scanner >= 1.21. > > Previously, qmail-scanner sent notifications for > all incoming virus emails. This was prone to > SMTP forgery, but at l

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]SMTP error code

2004-05-11 Thread Dallas L. Engelken
> > So why don't we change qmail-scanner to return > a 5xx SMTP error code and a short message when a > virus email is quarantined? > > That way, a legitimate sender will instantly > know that there is a problem with his email, > instead of believing that the email was delivered > successfully. I