>
> 10-15 mails PER SECOND and your running on a P3-1gHz?? This is
> seriously underpowered for this type of mail load. Not to mention you
> should have more ram...atleast a gig. I realize that this load is not
> consistent, but to be able to handle these periods you really are going
> to have t
ag 28 juni 2005 19:21
To: qmail-scanner-general@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with F-PROT
Maybe it is related whith my other problem:
=
I'm using qmail-scanner with f-prot.
Fro
Pamcho wrote:
That's the point... I don't know why they are NOT delivered... Are
local mails, and in the status of the local delivering in the log I see
that the max concurrency is not reached.
It's a temporary problem. Some time later they are delivered.
How much time t
Maybe it is related whith my other problem:
=
I'm using qmail-scanner with f-prot.
From few weeks ago I have a problem. I see some f-prot process in
memory consuming a lot of CPU:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES
That's the point... I don't know why they are NOT delivered... Are
local mails, and in the status of the local delivering in the log I see
that the max concurrency is not reached.
It's a temporary problem. Some time later they are delivered.
How much time take to deliver
Hi,
Take a look at the content of the messages in the queue.
And investigate why they are not delivered ...
Bye,
Joost
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Pamcho
Sent: dinsdag 28 juni 2005 18:26
To: qmail-scanner-general@lists.sourceforge.n
