On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 12:35:33PM +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 10:40:29AM +0200, Marcello Lupo wrote:
> > Hi,
> > remember too the exit status 9 when f-secure 4.50 and newer find a password
> > protected zip file. It cause the email to be lost.
> > I think may be interesting
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 10:40:29AM +0200, Marcello Lupo wrote:
> Hi,
> remember too the exit status 9 when f-secure 4.50 and newer find a password
> protected zip file. It cause the email to be lost.
> I think may be interesting to catch the output of the F-secure and to let this
> mails to pass
Hi,
remember too the exit status 9 when f-secure 4.50 and newer find a password
protected zip file. It cause the email to be lost.
I think may be interesting to catch the output of the F-secure and to let this
mails to pass through.
This the Log.
F-Secure Anti-Virus for Linux version 4.50 build
Hi!
OM> Maybe there is something missing in the install procedure? This
OM> file is nearly empty:
OM> -rw---1 qmailq root2 Aug 27 21:56
qmail-scanner-queue-version.txt
OM> in the past it contained the antivirus version...
Starting from FSAV version 4.50 reporting of scan
PS: here the new output of "fsav --version" : I guess it's just
because a small parsing issue in the ./configure script that
the version file is empty:
---
fsav --version
F-Secure Anti-Virus for Linux version 4.51 build 2312
Copyright (c) 1999-2003 F-Secure Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
F-
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 12:48:26PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > The server version has a scanning daemon which is running continuously,
> > making scanning much faster. Workstation version comes without the
> > daemon component.
> >
>
> Hmm.. the scanning daemon seems to be in the workstatio
How are the license terms for the workstation version? can you actually use
it a mailserver without needing a server license? (sounds a bit odd to me)
At 12:20 22-08-2003 +0200, Marcello Lupo wrote:
Hi,
i use the workstation version and it have the daemon you are talking about
and
i use it with
Hi,
i use the workstation version and it have the daemon you are talking about and
i use it with success. I wrote an email on yesterday about it.
Bye,
Marcello
On Thursday 21 August 2003 22:12, Jyri Hovila wrote:
> Hejp!
>
> PK> btw. Do you know what's the difference between server and workstatio
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 11:12:13PM +0300, Jyri Hovila wrote:
> Hejp!
>
> PK> btw. Do you know what's the difference between server and workstation
> PK> versions of fsav? They look quite the same.. (except the license?)
>
> The server version has a scanning daemon which is running continuously,
>
Hejp!
PK> btw. Do you know what's the difference between server and workstation
PK> versions of fsav? They look quite the same.. (except the license?)
The server version has a scanning daemon which is running continuously,
making scanning much faster. Workstation version comes without the
daemon
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 11:57:22PM +0300, Jyri Hovila wrote:
> Hi!
>
> >> Has somebody already tested f-secure 4.50 (workstation- or server-version)
> >> with the qmail-scanner v1.20rc1 ?
>
> Yeah, I'm running 1.20rc1 with F-Secure AV 4.50 server version. Works
> just fine. =)
>
OK. Nice to hea
Hi to all,
on 14/7 16/7 and 5/8 i posted 3 mails with the changes that i made (i'm not a
very cool programmer :-) ) on qmail-scanner 1.16 to let it works with
f-secure 4.50 .
Basically it have changed the output of the infected files as in example
below. From "infected" to "Infection" and them a
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 09:35:24PM +0200, Olivier M. wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 01:25:15PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > Has somebody already tested f-secure 4.50 (workstation- or server-version)
> > with the qmail-scanner v1.20rc1 ?
>
> not yet, but I will try tonight... How was it on
Hi!
>> Has somebody already tested f-secure 4.50 (workstation- or server-version)
>> with the qmail-scanner v1.20rc1 ?
Yeah, I'm running 1.20rc1 with F-Secure AV 4.50 server version. Works
just fine. =)
- Jyri
---
This SF.net email is sponso
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 01:25:15PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> Has somebody already tested f-secure 4.50 (workstation- or server-version)
> with the qmail-scanner v1.20rc1 ?
not yet, but I will try tonight... How was it on your system?
regards,
Olivier
--
__
Hello!
Has somebody already tested f-secure 4.50 (workstation- or server-version)
with the qmail-scanner v1.20rc1 ?
Those did not work with earlier versions of qmail-scanner (without patches)..
-- Pasi Kärkkäinen
^
.
16 matches
Mail list logo
