On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 11:18:44AM -0400, Asif Iqbal wrote:
> > >i.e. using whatever your triggering condition is (that sounds like the
> > >hardest part to me to get right...), create a local RBL record with a
> > >limited lifespan. Then ensure you are using rblsmtpd, and that it points at
>
> I
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 10:09:08AM +0530, Devendra Singh wrote:
> At 18/08/04 04:53 (), Jason Haar wrote:
> >On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 02:53:40AM +0800, Jason Wong wrote:
> >> If you're running qmail using tcpserver then block it using tcprules.
> >What I
> >> have done is modify my qmail-scanner so
Thank you.
-John
- Original Message -
From: "Devendra Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 9:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]qmail and iptables
>
D]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 9:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]qmail and iptables
>
> Check this Patch to ucspi-tcp. I have been using since many months.
> http://linux.voyager.hr/ucspi-tcp/tcpserver-limits-2004-07-25.diff
>
> Earlier I was using tcpserver-limits-2
PM
Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]qmail and iptables
>
> Check this Patch to ucspi-tcp. I have been using since many months.
> http://linux.voyager.hr/ucspi-tcp/tcpserver-limits-2004-07-25.diff
>
> Earlier I was using tcpserver-limits-2004-01-24.diff but upgraded it to
the
>
At 18/08/04 04:53 (), Jason Haar wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 02:53:40AM +0800, Jason Wong wrote:
> If you're running qmail using tcpserver then block it using tcprules.
What I
> have done is modify my qmail-scanner so that after scanning it checks
whether
> there was a problem with the mail. S
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 02:53:40AM +0800, Jason Wong wrote:
> If you're running qmail using tcpserver then block it using tcprules. What I
> have done is modify my qmail-scanner so that after scanning it checks whether
> there was a problem with the mail. Something like this:
Too right. I don't
On Saturday 14 August 2004 04:41, Mark Turner wrote:
> Is there any way to tie in qmail scanner/qmail and IPTables together so
> that if a spammer hammers your connection even though they are being
> denied, IPTables blocks them permanently or for a specified ammount of
> time?
If you're running q
On Sat, 2004-08-14 at 09:42, Sean Kennedy wrote:
> Mark Turner wrote:
>
> >Is there any way to tie in qmail scanner/qmail and IPTables together so
> >that if a spammer hammers your connection even though they are being
> >denied, IPTables blocks them permanently or for a specified ammount of
> >ti
Mark Turner wrote:
Is there any way to tie in qmail scanner/qmail and IPTables together so
that if a spammer hammers your connection even though they are being
denied, IPTables blocks them permanently or for a specified ammount of
time?
2 problems I could see:
1) The only way to modify the firewall
Is there any way to tie in qmail scanner/qmail and IPTables together so
that if a spammer hammers your connection even though they are being
denied, IPTables blocks them permanently or for a specified ammount of
time?
---
SF.Net email is spons
11 matches
Mail list logo
