I would guess that what he's talking about is that SUID is not a default.
For example, with Red Hat Linux 9, I had to install the perl-suidperl rpm
file in order for QS to work. Not a big deal, and certainly not the fault
of QS.
Aaron
Jason Haar said:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 11:40:46PM -0400,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 11:40:46PM -0400, Brandon Mercer wrote:
> Ok, so everybody on this list is going to be faced with the suid perl issue
> when they upgrade to perl 5.8.0. What is qmail-scanner going to do to fix
> this because obviously right now it's not going to work without some fixes.
Ok, so everybody on this list is going to be faced with the suid perl issue
when they upgrade to perl 5.8.0. What is qmail-scanner going to do to fix
this because obviously right now it's not going to work without some fixes.
Is this something that's going to be addressed with the next RC? Ho
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:44:31PM -0600, Jamyn wrote:
> Can we get the wrapper information added to FAQ.php, "System/Software
> Issues", under point 3? -J
You mean the part that says:
"install a compiled setuid "wrapper" - which then calls
qmail-scanner-queue.pl. In the contrib directory there
Quoting Gil Disatnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
° Suid perl is NOT recommended anymore by perl maintainers [...]
° Maybe we should simply wrap Qmail scanner with a wrapper script [...]
That's an excellent idea! It's such an excellent idea that it's been
included in the Qmail-Scanner distribution fo
Hello there,
Sorry if this topic has already been covered, I could not search the
message archive for some reason...
Suid perl is NOT recommended anymore by perl maintainers, To quote the
INSTALL file:
Because of the buggy history of suidperl, and the difficulty
of properly security audit
>
> (Yes, SUID perl scripts are enabled!)
>
Hi, SUIDPerl is safe or unsafe?
Jarbas
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&re
