[Qmail-scanner-general]qmail-scanner-1.24 Assistance

2005-03-09 Thread Jeff Duncan
Hello.  I am following the document at qmailrocks.org and I have the following issue (bottom line) that I can't seem to fix.  I am running Fedore Core 2 and qmail-scanner-1.24.  Can anyone point me in the right direction?    Testing suid nature of /usr/bin/perl...Looks OK...   Finished. Pl

[Qmail-scanner-general]Qmail-Scanner 1.24 Patch for Command Software Scanner

2005-02-09 Thread Robert Sandilands
Hi, Attached is a patch to release 1.24 version to allow it to work with CSAV for Linux/FreeBSD. It does better version detection, adds a required command-line switch and handles the return codes from the scanner better. It also adds support for reporting the infections/risks found. This patch is n

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Qmail-Scanner 1.24 Patch for Command Software Scanner

2005-01-06 Thread Robert Sandilands
Hi, To search for "Infection:" is not sufficient to detect infections detected by CSAV. You will have to search for "Infection:", "is a destructive program", "is a boot sector virus dropper", "is a virus dropper", "is a security risk or a "backdoor" program", "is a dropper for %s", "is a destru

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Qmail-Scanner 1.24 Patch for Command Software Scanner

2005-01-06 Thread Jason Haar
Robert Sandilands wrote: Hi, Attached is a patch to the currently release 1.24 version to allow it to work with CSAV for Linux/FreeBSD. It does better version detection, adds a required command-line switch and handles the return codes from the scanner better. Thanks for that. - if ($DD =~ / In

[Qmail-scanner-general]Qmail-Scanner 1.24 Patch for Command Software Scanner

2005-01-05 Thread Robert Sandilands
Hi, Attached is a patch to the currently release 1.24 version to allow it to work with CSAV for Linux/FreeBSD. It does better version detection, adds a required command-line switch and handles the return codes from the scanner better. This patch is not, nor does it imply any official statement

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Qmail-Scanner 1.24 and SpamAssassin 3.0 ?

2004-11-09 Thread Forexys Support Center
sorry ... i have see my error .. now that's work !     - Original Message - From: Forexys Support Center To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 8:15 AM Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]Qmail-Scanner 1.24 and SpamAssassin 3.0 ?

[Qmail-scanner-general]Qmail-Scanner 1.24 and SpamAssassin 3.0 ?

2004-11-09 Thread Forexys Support Center
Hi   my qmail-scanner 1.24st don't detect spamassassin 3.0, anyone have a patch for correct this ?   thanks bye    

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Qmail-scanner 1.24

2004-10-25 Thread Jason Haar
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 03:32:20PM -0400, Jim Maul wrote: > is from the qmail-scanner Changes for 1.24. It states that QS will only > call spamc for messages bigger than 250k. Is this really true or just a > typo and its actually the exact opposite? I dont see how this would work... Typo - it

[Qmail-scanner-general]Qmail-scanner 1.24

2004-10-25 Thread Jim Maul
The following statement: Fixed a FreeBSD buglet to do with spamc not playing with pipes correctly for messages bigger than 250K. Q-S is now hard-wired to only call spamc for messages bigger than 250K. Hopefully that doesn't burn anyone (you can always edit the code...) is from the qmail-scann