Hello. I am following the document at
qmailrocks.org and I have the following issue (bottom line) that I can't
seem to fix. I am running Fedore Core 2 and qmail-scanner-1.24. Can anyone point me in the right
direction?
Testing suid nature of /usr/bin/perl...Looks
OK...
Finished. Pl
Hi,
Attached is a patch to release 1.24 version to allow it to
work with CSAV for Linux/FreeBSD. It does better version detection, adds
a required command-line switch and handles the return codes from the
scanner better.
It also adds support for reporting the infections/risks found.
This patch is n
Hi,
To search for "Infection:" is not sufficient to detect infections
detected by CSAV. You will have to search for "Infection:", "is a
destructive program", "is a boot sector virus dropper", "is a virus
dropper", "is a security risk or a "backdoor" program", "is a dropper
for %s", "is a destru
Robert Sandilands wrote:
Hi,
Attached is a patch to the currently release 1.24 version to allow it
to work with CSAV for Linux/FreeBSD. It does better version detection,
adds a required command-line switch and handles the return codes from
the scanner better.
Thanks for that.
- if ($DD =~ / In
Hi,
Attached is a patch to the currently release 1.24 version to allow it to
work with CSAV for Linux/FreeBSD. It does better version detection, adds
a required command-line switch and handles the return codes from the
scanner better.
This patch is not, nor does it imply any official statement
sorry ... i have see my error .. now that's work
!
- Original Message -
From:
Forexys Support
Center
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 8:15
AM
Subject:
[Qmail-scanner-general]Qmail-Scanner 1.24 and SpamAssassin 3.0 ?
Hi
my qmail-scanner 1.24st don't detect spamassassin
3.0, anyone have a patch for correct this ?
thanks bye
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 03:32:20PM -0400, Jim Maul wrote:
> is from the qmail-scanner Changes for 1.24. It states that QS will only
> call spamc for messages bigger than 250k. Is this really true or just a
> typo and its actually the exact opposite? I dont see how this would work...
Typo - it
The following statement:
Fixed a FreeBSD buglet to do with spamc not playing with pipes
correctly for messages
bigger than 250K. Q-S is now hard-wired to only call spamc for messages
bigger than 250K.
Hopefully that doesn't burn anyone (you can always edit the code...)
is from the qmail-scann