Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Q-S 1.24 and SpamAssassin 3.x.x

2004-11-01 Thread Jason Haar
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 01:40:37PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Does Q-S 1.24 support SA 3.x.x? Or should I go with SA 2.64? Absolutely - and yes - you should definitely be using 3.0 instead of 2.x -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 96

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Q-S 1.24 and SpamAssassin 3.x.x

2004-11-01 Thread Aecio F. Neto
I am using q-s1.22 patched with SA 3.0 without no issues at all. Just need to be careful about deprecated options and new way to setting old things. IIRC, this is all in README file. Regards.

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Q-S 1.24 and SpamAssassin 3.x.x

2004-11-01 Thread Ed Henderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 2:41 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]Q-S 1.24 and SpamAssassin 3.x.x > > > Does Q-S 1.24 support SA 3.x.x? Or should I go wi

[Qmail-scanner-general]Q-S 1.24 and SpamAssassin 3.x.x

2004-11-01 Thread nwb
Does Q-S 1.24 support SA 3.x.x? Or should I go with SA 2.64? Thanks, nwb -- ___ Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm --- This SF.Net email is sponsor