Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Illegal Breakage in Headers

2003-12-18 Thread Jason Haar
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 04:29:38PM +0100, Salvatore Toribio wrote: > It seems that there is an "\r" after '...(209.239.41.230)' and > another one after '...userid 65534)'. > > I don't understand yet why the header must not have CR/NULL. Maybe > Jason can give us an explanation and how to work ar

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Illegal Breakage in Headers

2003-12-18 Thread Salvatore Toribio
Rick Macdougall , wrote Hi, I'm just investigating some emails that were quarantined possibly incorrectly. They were bouces from spammers forging the from address but I'm not quite sure why the Illegal breakage in headers was matched. Is it because of the X-Mailer: IronMail(TM) v3.1.2 header?

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Illegal Breakage in Headers

2003-12-18 Thread Rick Macdougall
Hi, I'm going to have to disable those checks myself as well, just looking through the log files I see ordb relay tests being marked a Disallowed breakage and this was with a stock QS 1.20. I don't have the message anymore but the log file reports Fri, 12 Dec 2003 05:02:30 -0500 [EMAIL PROTEC

[Qmail-scanner-general]Illegal Breakage in Headers

2003-12-17 Thread Rick Macdougall
Hi, I'm just investigating some emails that were quarantined possibly incorrectly. They were bouces from spammers forging the from address but I'm not quite sure why the Illegal breakage in headers was matched. Is it because of the X-Mailer: IronMail(TM) v3.1.2 header? Is that a bug with QS o