Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] Updated ClamAV but QmailScanner Missing Version Numbering

2008-02-21 Thread Tim Duncan
Looks like everything is getting scanned and it works manually as well. The QS logs are saying that scans are being completed. Don't know why the version number of both the Clamav version and the version of the database would not get snagged by QS. On Feb 21, 2008, at 5:06 PM, Jim Maul wrot

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] Updated ClamAV but QmailScanner Missing Version Numbering

2008-02-21 Thread Jim Maul
Hard to say. Although both of those versions of QS should work with that version of clamav. I was referring to MUCH older (like 1.x) releases of QS when i mentioned it. Does clamav work correctly when run manually? Tim Duncan wrote: > Just started happening after the update from ClamAV 0.92

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] Updated ClamAV but QmailScanner Missing Version Numbering

2008-02-21 Thread Tim Duncan
Just started happening after the update from ClamAV 0.92 to 0.92.1 I was running 2.01st and am now running 2.02st, thinking that it might be a version recognition thing too. On Feb 21, 2008, at 4:54 PM, Jim Maul wrote: > Tim Duncan wrote: >> Hi there, >> I just had an odd think happen and not

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general] Updated ClamAV but QmailScanner Missing Version Numbering

2008-02-21 Thread Jim Maul
Tim Duncan wrote: > Hi there, > > I just had an odd think happen and not sure where to go to look for > an answer. > > I just went through the update for ClamAV 0.92.1 and after the update > I did the obligatory > > /var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl -z > > and now the text makes no men

[Qmail-scanner-general] Updated ClamAV but QmailScanner Missing Version Numbering

2008-02-21 Thread Tim Duncan
Hi there, I just had an odd think happen and not sure where to go to look for an answer. I just went through the update for ClamAV 0.92.1 and after the update I did the obligatory /var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl -z and now the text makes no mention of ClamAV Versioning like before (