Matthew Goodman wrote:
> Woops replied to sender instead of reply-to. Let's try again:
>
>
> Some items in these directories are owned qscand:nofiles, others are owned
> qscand:qscand
>
> I really have no idea how they could be mis-chown'd like that.
>
> Any ideas where I could look?
>
>
Without
Woops replied to sender instead of reply-to. Let's try again:
Some items in these directories are owned qscand:nofiles, others are owned
qscand:qscand
I really have no idea how they could be mis-chown'd like that.
Any ideas where I could look?
-Original Message-
From: Bookworm [mailt
