On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Jonathan Tai wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 08:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > In the past few days, it seems my main mail server has reached a critical
> > mass: it cannot scan incoming emails quickly enough to keep up with the
> > demand. As a r
In the past few days, it seems my main mail server has reached a critical
mass: it cannot scan incoming emails quickly enough to keep up with the
demand. As a result, the CPU shoots through the roof and making smtp
connections takes several seconds or times out altogether. I have
experimented
mail-scanner/qmail-scanner-1.20rc3.tgz?download
No, the link wasn't mis-typed, I screwed up, sorry. I simply clicked on
the link: qmail-scanner-1.20rc3.tgz, ignoring the "GnuPG signature of"
from http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net/. I might suggest making the
former the link, ra
Is anyone aware that:
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/qmail-scanner/qmail-scanner-1.20rc3.tgz.asc?download
Is broken? Whichever mirror I choose, all I get when I try to download
the distro is the pgp sig...
James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor
[EMAIL PROTE
en DDoS'd, so they've given up,
> setting all hosts to BLOCK.
> (oh and SPEWS as well, but I don't use them as they're painful...)"
>
> http://slashdot.org/articles/03/08/27/0214238.shtml?tid=111&tid=126
>
> http://www.zdnet.com.au/newstech/communicati
Hi Simon:
I agree with you completely regarding the question and where it belongs,
but want to point out something regarding your take on the privacy issue.
It's probably marginally topical for this list, but here goes:
In the US (it may be different in Germany; not sure), although it is
probabl
Yes. BTW, you will want to patch qmail-scanner...it's just one line in
the script that needs to be changed to prevent large emails from being
bounced. The list archives have it from within the past month or so.
On 9 Jan 2003, Ed Weinberg wrote:
> That did it. Does spamd need to always be on?
I remember going through this. You need to start spamd, preferably in
daemon mode. I sorta thought the SA scripts being installed was enough
for QS to find it and configure itself properly, but it isn't. Once you
start spamd with the -d flag, rebuild and install QS. It should find it
then.
On
ant that if you *wanted* the threshold
to be 0 (might was well just kill your mail server :).
Unless you tell me otherwise, I'll assume you don't mind me sharing this
with the SA list? They came up empty on this.
James Smallacombe
empty; this tells qmail-remote to look
up MX records as usual. smtproutes may include wild-
cards:
.af.mil:
:heaven.af.mil
An alternative would be to just configure tcpserver to not invoke
qmail-scanner for connections from your networ
what to do about this, but in my mail program
> > (Ximian Evolution 1.20) I filter on:
> >
> > Header X-Spam-Status contains "Yes" AND
> > Header X-Spam-Status does not contain required=0
> >
> > This solves my problem, but I also would like a fix in QS for
I have a new server up with qmail-scanner, spamassassin 2.4.3 (spamd for
system-wide use) and maildrop. It works fine most of the time, but when
certain attachments arrive (NOT ones listed in quarantine.txt), the email
is rejected as spam because the threshold and hits are reset to 0 like
this
12 matches
Mail list logo
