Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]qss 2.02

2003-09-04 Thread Thorsten Spaeth
Hi! Do you have any error messages? Even if I don't have RH9 or and RedHats at this time, a little bit more information would be useful for all I think... :-) Regards, T. Spaeth T. Albert wrote: Hi, i'm wondering, why qss 2.02 doesn't work on my RedHat 9 box ? i have similar qss on Mandrak

AW: [Qmail-scanner-general]vpopmail

2002-10-21 Thread Thorsten Spaeth
Well, in Chat I would say "Meta-Question" :-) So what's the problem with this combination - works fine here. A more exactly question would be appreciate. Regards, Thorsten --- ACHTUNG: neue Adresse und Telefonnummer! netactive(R) - Späth & Wien GbR Schifferstraße 10 - 14, 27568 Bremerhaven

AW: [Qmail-scanner-general]corrupt MacAfee scanner/resource problems

2002-09-17 Thread Thorsten Spaeth
Title: Nachricht 139 ... looks like Memory probs.   Using softlimit ? Try increasing the memory assigned to it ...     Regards,   Thorsten     --- ACHTUNG: neue Adresse und Telefonnummer!netactive(R) - Späth & Wien GbRSchifferstraße 10 - 14, 27568 BremerhavenTel: (0471) 9 48 38 10  Fax: 94 1

AW: [Qmail-scanner-general]per-user spamassassin

2002-09-09 Thread Thorsten Spaeth
Title: Nachricht Hi!   IMHO that this is not possible (yet) as you want it.   If you refer to the FAQ :   "How do I make Qmail-Scanner only scan mail for some local users?. You don't. Qmail-Scanner is a server-based product. If you want per-user control, then you'll really have to look for

AW: [Qmail-scanner-general]Need help

2002-09-08 Thread Thorsten Spaeth
Hi! Did you watch the memory requirements as mentioned if you use qmail with supervise-scripting? This also produces this error if I remember! Best Regards, T. Spaeth > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Im > Auftrag von Carlo Wood > Ge

[Qmail-scanner-general]AVP - Kaspersky changed "signature"

2002-09-04 Thread Thorsten Spaeth
Hi! I just subscribed to the mailinglist and want to notice, that AVP changed the "identifying" signature. So there's no more "Version X.Y build XXX". It's now (here for me with Version 4.0.2.2) just "Version 4.0.2.2". So you should probably change the detection at ~ line 1068 from if (/Version