[Qmail-scanner-general]f-prot

2005-07-01 Thread Pamcho
I'm using qmail-scanner with f-prot. From few weeks ago I have a problem. I see some f-prot process in memory consuming a lot of CPU: PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND 30020 qscand25 0 6604 4284 2120 R 39.0 1.7 40:17.09 f-prot 2445 qs

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with F-PROT

2005-06-28 Thread Pamcho
> > 10-15 mails PER SECOND and your running on a P3-1gHz?? This is > seriously underpowered for this type of mail load. Not to mention you > should have more ram...atleast a gig. I realize that this load is not > consistent, but to be able to handle these periods you really are going > to have t

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with F-PROT

2005-06-28 Thread Pamcho
n/tmp/manjula11198679954793 qscand2445 1 42 12:48 ?00:22:15 /usr/local/f-prot/f-prot -ai -archive -dumb /var/spool/qmailscan/tmp/manjula11198693124792339 The files don't exist now. Why is this? = On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Pa

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with F-PROT

2005-06-28 Thread Pamcho
e not delivered ... > > Bye, > > Joost > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Pamcho > Sent: dinsdag 28 juni 2005 18:26 > To: qmail-scanner-general@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [Qmail-scanner-gener

[Qmail-scanner-general]Problems with F-PROT

2005-06-28 Thread Pamcho
I have qmail-scanner with f-prot. In some moments I receive up to 10-15 mails/second. In this moments, when I do: # qmHandle -s I see the local queue growing up very fast. Why is this? -

[Qmail-scanner-general]f-prot

2005-06-27 Thread Pamcho
I'm using qmail-scanner with f-prot. From few weeks ago I have a problem. I see some f-prot process in memory consuming a lot of CPU: PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND 30020 qscand25 0 6604 4284 2120 R 39.0 1.7 40:17.09 f-prot 2445 qsc

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]MAIL SERVER BACKUP

2005-06-24 Thread Pamcho
Is there any way to make that every mail received by MAILSERVER-B from anywhere except from MAILSERVER-A was sended to MAILSERVER-A, except in case of MAILSERVER-A was down? On Wed, 22 Jun 2005, Billy Newsom wrote: > Pamcho wrote: > > > > I have the followin

[Qmail-scanner-general]MAIL SERVER BACKUP

2005-06-22 Thread Pamcho
I have the following configuration: MAIL SERVER A: With DSPAM and QMAIL-SCANNER MAIL SERVER B: With all the mailboxes All my domains have MX 10 SERVER-A MX 20 SERVER-B So the mails go to SERVER-A, the are filtered, and then, using smtproutes, sent to SERVER-B.

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]INCONTROLED SPAM

2005-06-08 Thread Pamcho
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Jeremy Bowen wrote: > On Wednesday 08 June 2005 10:28 pm, Pamcho wrote: > > Anyone knows about a kind of SPAM that is send to a domain, to addresses > > like: > > > > "something strange"@domain > > > > thousands a

[Qmail-scanner-general]INCONTROLED SPAM

2005-06-08 Thread Pamcho
Anyone knows about a kind of SPAM that is send to a domain, to addresses like: "something strange"@domain thousands a day, and from multiple IP sources? Mi mail server receive one of these attacks and stacks the qmail queue, so the "local queue" grows and grows... Is there any

[Qmail-scanner-general]QMAIL-SCANNER + DSPAM

2005-05-31 Thread Pamcho
use it in server B with QMAIL-SCANNER. Is it possible? Anyone have a SUB with that for QMAIL-SCANNER? Thanks a lot! Pamcho --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo. Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create

[Qmail-scanner-general]QMAIL-SCANNER + DSPAM

2005-05-25 Thread Pamcho
use it in server B with QMAIL-SCANNER. Is it possible? Anyone have a SUB with that for QMAIL-SCANNER? Thanks a lot! Pamcho --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: GoToMeeting - the easiest way to collaborate online with coworkers a