On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 08:08:19AM +0200, Shai wrote:
> Hi,
> Can you please tell me how I can stop these "potential virus" scans from
> being stopped?
> Disallowed breakage found in header name - potential virus
> and
> Disallowed characters found in MIME headers
Set this:
#Try to fix bad MI
Hello,
This is what I get on mails sent by Amazon.de (germany):
*** Qmail-Scanner Quarantine Envelope Details Begin ***
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" via matrix
X-Qmail-Scanner-Rcpt-To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.20rc2 (. problem Foun
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 11:12:42AM +1300, Jason Haar wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 12:01:34PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > There was some discussion on the list about the 1.20rc3 f-secure 4.5x returncode
> > handling.. because the returncodes have changed. was there any conclusion, does
>
FYI: Qmail-scanner 1.20rc2 doesn't seem to handle fsav crashes very well:
matrix:/var/qmail/scanner-maildir # fsav --version
F-Secure Anti-Virus for Linux version 4.51 build 2312
qmail-queue.log:
Wed, 10 Sep 2003 09:00:32 +0200:32666: +++ starting debugging for process 32666 by
uid=501 at Wed
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 03:48:02PM -0700, Anthony Baratta wrote:
> >apply this patch http://www.qmail.org/qmail-smtpd-viruscan-1.1.patch
> >and let qmail handle it for you... you'll have basically no overhead
> >from it.
> Can you verify which attachment types this patch blocks?? I want to make
>
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 11:08:28AM -0300, Rodrigo Vaz wrote:
> Hello Brian,
> Yes , i've tried to increase softlimit memory to 10 and i've tried
> to run qmail-smtp without softlimit , but nothing chaged =(
> log messages are the same .
>
> If you have some ideia i will be thankfull =)
mmm,
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 03:21:31PM +0300, Jyri Hovila wrote:
> Starting from version 4.50, F-Secure Anti-Virus gives out different (and
> more informative :) return codes than the earlier versions. Below is my
> suggestion for a scanning sub for FSAV 4.50. I've done very little
> programming with P
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 01:08:46PM +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
> [See http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net/ for details]
> This is to announce 1.20rc2 - a RELEASE CANDIDATE for 1.20
seems to work fine so far (on a pretty busy server), good work :)
a request: could you please keep the same logging fo
PS: here the new output of "fsav --version" : I guess it's just
because a small parsing issue in the ./configure script that
the version file is empty:
---
fsav --version
F-Secure Anti-Virus for Linux version 4.51 build 2312
Copyright (c) 1999-2003 F-Secure Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
F-
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 12:48:26PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > The server version has a scanning daemon which is running continuously,
> > making scanning much faster. Workstation version comes without the
> > daemon component.
> >
>
> Hmm.. the scanning daemon seems to be in the workstatio
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 09:35:24PM +0200, Olivier M. wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 01:25:15PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > Has somebody already tested f-secure 4.50 (workstation- or server-version)
> > with the qmail-scanner v1.20rc1 ?
>
> not yet, but I will try to
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 01:25:15PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> Has somebody already tested f-secure 4.50 (workstation- or server-version)
> with the qmail-scanner v1.20rc1 ?
not yet, but I will try tonight... How was it on your system?
regards,
Olivier
--
__
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 01:00:50PM -0500, D.Monroe wrote:
> FWIW...I was curious whether there was any pattern to what time-of-day
> spam is received. I analyzed a few full 24hr periods of logs and found:
what about trying qss ? :) http://sourceforge.net/projects/qss/
"Qmail-Scanner Statistics"
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 01:36:41PM +0700, toni wrote:
> i have problem with qmail-scanner when sending email using squirrelmail
> and got this message: 451 qq temporary problem (#4.3.0)
> i use qmail-scanner 1.15 and already set softlimit to 128MB :-(,
> could somebody help me?
is there any in
Hi Jason & list readers,
About the spamassassin+mysql stuff, would it be ok for you
to integrate my patch (not the current one, but something
cleaner and improved) to your CVS tree ?
Maybe we could keep the current spamassassin part as it is
now, and add a "sub-spamassassin-sql.pl" scanner wit
Hello,
The server-wide anti-spam system I'm working on (based on
qmail, qmail-scanner and spamassassin) is now running:
currently beta-testing it "live".
If you want to give a try: just setup an account (preferably a
mail alias) under http://matrix.omnis.ch/ : domain = "matrix.omnis.ch"
passwd
Hi Jason, and thanks for your feedback!
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 02:45:49PM +1300, Jason Haar wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 12:09:01AM +0100, Olivier M. wrote:
> > voila, my test version is available under http://omnis.ch/stuff/ospam/
> > and seems to work well :) It's
Bonsoir,
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 01:22:55PM -0700, Balázs Nagy wrote:
> Olivier M. wrote:
> > Ok, I guess I'll start using an sql DB and implement that
> > in qmail-scanner in omail-admin. More to come later :)
>
> Could you forward me your pointers? I would like to s
Hi,
Currently trying 1.12 (btw, thx for the updates and the great
work!): in my 1.03 version, there was a $spam_rec variable
with a list of domains to scan for spam: seems this is not
the case anymore in current version.
Is there an easy way to get this feature back, or should
I hack the code?
19 matches
Mail list logo
