RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Permissions problem /var/spool/qmailscan/tmp

2004-07-18 Thread Michael Ralston
amav to be owned by qscand also... Alternatively I guess you could install qmail-scanner as user clamav and then you wouldn't have all that mucking around Hope this helps... Michael Ralston Stral.net -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf O

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Permissions problem /var/spool/qmailscan/tmp

2004-07-15 Thread Michael Ralston
s problem /var/spool/qmailscan/tmp Michael Ralston wrote: >I'm having a similar problem to Terry since I upgraded clamav to debian >version 0.73-2. > >Log output shown below > >Thu, 15 Jul 2004 11:44:06 EST:2915: scanloop: >scanner=clamdscan_scanner,plain_text_msg=0 >T

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Permissions problem /var/spool/qmailscan/tmp

2004-07-15 Thread Michael Ralston
mdscan was: /var/spool/qmailscan/tmp/ns1.stral.net10898558444802915: Can't access the file ERROR -- Thu, 15 Jul 2004 11:44:06 EST:2915: error_condition: X-Qmail-Scanner-1.22: clamdscan: corrupt or unknown clamd scanner error or memory/resource/perms problem - exit status 2 Michael Ralston Stral.

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Account based content scanning

2004-06-01 Thread Michael Ralston
3:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Michael Ralston Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Account based content scanning On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 14:38 , Michael Ralston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent: >I am using qmail-scanner quite successfully on my server, but I'd like >to only check email on

[Qmail-scanner-general]Account based content scanning

2004-06-01 Thread Michael Ralston
I am using qmail-scanner quite successfully on my server, but I'd like to only check email on certain accounts or domains, not system wide. Is qmail-scanner able to do this or is there any other software that would be better suited? Michael --

[Qmail-scanner-general]Running qmail-scanner with persistant perl

2004-05-27 Thread Michael Ralston
I was just wondering if it was possible to run qmail-scanner with the persistant perl binaries (#!/usr/bin/speedy instead of #!/usr/bin/perl) Would this have any effect on performance? Michael Ralston Stral.net --- This SF.Net email is