[Qmail-scanner-general]tempfail

2003-12-09 Thread Adam Denenberg
what happens to the message if &tempfail() gets callled and exits with 111? Does the message get requeued later or is the message lost, or bounced? thanks adam --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LI

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]redundant scanning and unzip

2003-10-07 Thread Adam Denenberg
i thought --secure called unzip and analyze... does it call manalyze and panalyze as well? On Tuesday, October 7, 2003, at 05:22 PM, Dallas L. Engelken wrote: so i should probably turn off --unzip then in uvscan since i have to leave it on in Q-S to get perlscanner to read inside and outside th

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]redundant scanning and unzip

2003-10-07 Thread Adam Denenberg
thanks Dallas, so i should probably turn off --unzip then in uvscan since i have to leave it on in Q-S to get perlscanner to read inside and outside the zip and then turn redundant_scanning on. That seems most optimal CPU wise for needing to catch attachments and viruses both inside and outside

[Qmail-scanner-general]redundant scanning and unzip

2003-10-07 Thread Adam Denenberg
Hi, I have redundant scanning off in my 1.16 qmail-scanner and uvscan setup b/c i use --unzip with uvscan. I would like to turn off force_unzip, but i need perlscanner to block attachments outside and inside the zip. is it possible for perlscanner to block outside and inside the zip without for

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]updated silent virus list

2003-10-01 Thread Adam Denenberg
try typing umask.. see if your umask is set to somethign other than 022.. that could be an issue. adam On Tuesday, September 30, 2003, at 05:48 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: - Original Message - From: "Doug Monroe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> reset's the bit?? FWIW- VI works fine for me w/o re

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Sobig.F and attachment type

2003-08-21 Thread Adam Denenberg
cool report, did you generate that from Q-S? If so how? thanks adam On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 16:27, Dallas L. Engelken wrote: > > So far today we have trapped over 400 infected emails with > > the Sobig.F attachment. > > > > check out the attached image 18% of the mail today is sobig.f.

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]uvscan confusion with --unzip and --mime

2003-07-16 Thread Adam Denenberg
? thanks again for your patience adam On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 12:40, Dallas L. Engelken wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:09 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [Qmail-sc

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]uvscan confusion with --unzip and --mime

2003-07-16 Thread Adam Denenberg
-16 at 11:57, Dallas L. Engelken wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 8:28 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]uvscan confusion with --unzip >

[Qmail-scanner-general]uvscan confusion with --unzip and --mime

2003-07-16 Thread Adam Denenberg
I read a while back about how uvscan supports the new options "--mime" and "--mailbox" which help decode mime messages and read messages in standard mailbox format. Also i understand that since Q-S calls uvscan with --secure that the "--unzip" is also called from within uvscan. Does this mean the

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Environment variables

2003-06-28 Thread Adam Denenberg
i am not sure if qmail-scanner has access to those variables yet. Those env variables are set by qmail-local if i remember correctly so you would have to be calling something out of a .qmail file to get those variables. At the mta level you probably have to pull out the RCPT to lines to ge

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]analysis of mailstats.csv - with perland mysql

2003-06-24 Thread Adam Denenberg
i have not seen one on the list, although i did see a patch to qmail-scanner to log to mysql instead of mailstats.csv. Either way this would be a very cool tool to have. Is it tested? IF so can you share? thanks adam On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 22:09, Jesse Reynolds wrote: > Hi folx > > I'm writing