Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]SA tests in ervery mail?

2005-01-26 Thread Salvatore Toribio
At 16:55 +0100 25-01-2005, Nicki Messerschmidt, Linksystem Muenchen GmbH wrote: Salvatore Toribio said the following: Hi I don't understand your question. Can you explain it? Well, using spamassassin-fast (-c) qmail-scanner inserts the X-Spam-Status Header but no information about why this mail is

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]SA tests in ervery mail?

2005-01-26 Thread Salvatore Toribio
At 11:54 +0100 25-01-2005, Arnvid Karstad wrote: Hello, On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:30:11 +0100 - "Nicki Messerschmidt, Linksystem Muenchen GmbH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: is there a possibility to have the SpamAssassin headers in every mail and not moving the sa headers to something like: X-Qmail-S

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]SA tests in ervery mail?

2005-01-26 Thread Arnvid Karstad
On Wednesday 26 January 2005 14:59, Salvatore Toribio wrote: > >-> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=? required=? > This information means that SA didn't check the message, usually > because it was bigger than 250 Kb You're wrong on both your assumptions.. IT does check the message, it does change the topi