I will agree with Jason, I doubt you'll really see that much improvement
by moving clamd to another server. Clamd is really a pretty efficient
beast. In addition to making sure that it's not spamassassin, I would
suggest that you make sure you're actually running clamdscan, and not
the single
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 08:45:33AM +1000, Michael Bellears wrote:
> Load on one of our qmail,vpopmail,qmail+scanner,clamd server is
> averaging ~7 - Is it possible to run clamd on remote server?
Is that where your problem lies?
I mean, what is taking most of the CPU? Is it actually clamd? You're
