Anyone here successful jailing clamd mem usage with softlimit without
getting Segmentatio Fault error?
Thanks!
Bitz
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 -
Lucian Margarit wrote:
I'm using qmail qs-1.22 and clamav-0.74 on a RedHat 9.
Clamscan and clamdscan are working from the command
line, but qs does not quarantine the test viruse.
Actually perlscanner is working, so I receive 3 out of
4 test messages. Also, qmail-scanner-queue.pl -v says
qs it's wo
I'm using qmail qs-1.22 and clamav-0.74 on a RedHat 9.
Clamscan and clamdscan are working from the command
line, but qs does not quarantine the test viruse.
Actually perlscanner is working, so I receive 3 out of
4 test messages. Also, qmail-scanner-queue.pl -v says
qs it's working w/ clamd-scanner.
>I have ONE client that does NOT want qmai-scanner, clamav or
>spamassassin filtering on any mail sent to thier domain.
>
>Is there a way in (or a patch for) qmail-scanner to keep them from
>being scanned?
Had the same thing...
In the qmail tcp.smtpd file, I put in:
IPADDRESS:allow,QMAILQUEUE="
I have ONE client that does NOT want qmai-scanner, clamav or
spamassassin filtering on any mail sent to thier domain.
Is there a way in (or a patch for) qmail-scanner to keep them from
being scanned?
Greg
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by Bla
