Off topic for some, but this is a good /. post on the effectiveness of clamav with
qmail - thought it would be interesting to this community.
http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/03/2120227&mode=thread
Josh
---
This SF.Net email is sp
Why don't you complain to f-prot?
Other AV systems are catching it just fine (e.g. Trend, ClamAV).
It is a virus, and as such your AV should catch it. The only thing Q-S can
do to help is the "--redundant yes" option - i.e. to pass the entire
original e-mail to the AV subsystem along with the att
does qmail-scanner currently support, or planning to support symantec's
anti-virus scanner?
::[ RFC 2795 ]::
"Democracy means simply the bludgeoning of the
people by the people for the people."
-Oscar Wilde
---
This SF.Net email is sponsore
Im probably going to get yelled at but I got a error from sourceforge
when trying to search the list
This is what I am doing currently
.*([0-9]{15}|[a-z]{20}).* Virus-Content-Type:
Beagel/Bagle Virus
But I had a user call saying they were not getting a atachment and I
seen it
At 12:59 04/03/2004, Martin, Jeremy wrote:
Thanks guys! (!!!)
I work nights, and was woken up yesterday afternoon, my boss wanted to
know if qmail-scanner scanned inside of archives ;-) Should have thought
to check this list sooner... Philip's version of the FFS is working
great here with QS 1
* Michael Bellears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-03 12:02]:
> I read the clamdscan performs better than clamscan - but replacing
> clamscan with clamdscan in qmail-scanner.pl produces:
> 451 qq Temporary problem
> error_condition: X-Qmail-Scanner-1.20: clamscan: corrupt or unknown
> ClamAV scanner
Have anyone trued this combination and how did u get it working ?
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundam
