Has anyone implemented Q-S, spamassassin, and TMDA at gateway level?
I'd to know how you implement this combination. Is TMDA done before Q-S
then pass on to Q-S with Spamassassin? What's the best way to implement
these? I already have Q-S with spammassassin.
Thanks so much!
---
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:38:43 +1300 Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:36:58 -0500:5085: -- all finished. Total of
> > 10.295683 secs
I asked the same question a year ago - and the answer from Jason was
that the total time includes *getting* the message from remote S
When sending email to a server with Q-S 1.2 I get:
Jan 15 00:43:16 mercury X-Qmail-Scanner-1.20:
[host.domain.com107412739646117405] host.domain.com107412739646117405
exists - try again later...
... in the maillog. Any idea what could be causing it?
-
Where can we get this...
should we consider adding spambox functionality into qmail-scanner,
adding the best of all patches...?
configureable at install?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:44 AM 1/14/2004, Dan Didier wrote:
I imagine it could somehow be done by saying spams with a score over 15
ar
helps if I link to it...huh "-)
doh!
http://bryantschools.org/qmail-scanner-1.16.spambox.tgz
Barry Smoke wrote:
I hand applied his patch to the qmail-scanner-queue.template, and
another one of the installer files,
so that it could be easily installed...
and once qmail-scanner-queue.pl is generat
I hand applied his patch to the qmail-scanner-queue.template, and
another one of the installer files,
so that it could be easily installed...
and once qmail-scanner-queue.pl is generated, just go into that file,
and edit your spambox address(and whitelist address)
and set
my $spamc_options=' -f';
Your suggestion of rtfm'ing did the trick! :) Thanks much.
My Pakistani customers will now be quite happy their spam goes to a
local email box
and not over their 300kb/s dish.
-Ryan
Jason Haar wrote:
You need to read the manpage on qmail-queue to see how to fiddle with such
things.
" The
At 11:44 AM 1/14/2004, Dan Didier wrote:
I imagine it could somehow be done by saying spams with a score over 15
are most certainly spam. Spam messages under 15 are possible spam.
I don't know how to do it, but it makes sense. Anyone got any ideas?
i use Salvatore Toribio's patch to do this. work
Frickin reply-to ;)
-Forwarded Message-
From: Rick Romero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Multiple qmail instances, Q-S, and SA
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:57:59 -0600
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 03:42, Jason Haar wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14
>
> Why not?
>
> What's wrong with forcing the running of SA? What's the downside?
>
> --
> Cheers
>
> Jason Haar
This means that local user's email also gets scanned which means
possibility of getting trapped as Spam and means more processing req'd
on server since all messages are getting s
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 02:56:39PM -0500, CertaintyTech wrote:
> I have setup two instances of qmail so that my users can avoid longer
> transfer times for messages. Messages are first sent to a qmail-smtpd
> instance (w/no Q-S) on external interface and then messages are
> smtprouted to second in
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 02:55:21PM -0500, James Herschel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've just installed qmail-scanner-1.20st and was looking at my
> /var/spool/qmailscan/qmail-queue.log file to see the difference when I turn
> on the minidebug option. I was alarmed to see scan times for certain
> Wed,
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 02:39:47PM -0500, Ryan Pavely wrote:
> Lets say I
> my $RedirectTo='[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
> print EIN "$sender\0$RedirectTo";
>
> I get the error "Unable to open pipe to /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue [54]
> (#4.3.0) -"
>
You need to read the manpage on qmail-queue to see how
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 08:20:31PM +0100, Brian Ipsen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I know this issue is discussed in the FAQ - except, that the attached
> message doesn't have the usual CR/LF problem...
Yes it does!
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=_NextPart_40055a17e
On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 13:56, CertaintyTech wrote:
> I have setup two instances of qmail so that my users can avoid longer
> transfer times for messages. Messages are first sent to a qmail-smtpd
> instance (w/no Q-S) on external interface and then messages are
> smtprouted to second instance on 127
I have setup two instances of qmail so that my users can avoid longer
transfer times for messages. Messages are first sent to a qmail-smtpd
instance (w/no Q-S) on external interface and then messages are
smtprouted to second instance on 127.0.0.1 interface where they are then
run thru Q-S. Now th
Hello,
I've just installed qmail-scanner-1.20st and was looking at my
/var/spool/qmailscan/qmail-queue.log file to see the difference when I turn
on the minidebug option. I was alarmed to see scan times for certain
functions ranging into tens of seconds. Can anyone here let me know what to
make
Hello,
reading the docs to the patched version of QS here:
http://xoomer.virgilio.it/j.toribio/qmail-scanner/
I see this:
---
c) --sa-reject [yes|no](default no)
If you enable sa-reject and sa-delete is properly set, messages with a score
higher than sa-delete will be rejected bef
I imagine it could somehow be done by saying spams with a score over 15
are most certainly spam. Spam messages under 15 are possible spam.
I don't know how to do it, but it makes sense. Anyone got any ideas?
Dan
>
> Where is "David's spambox patch" found?
>
> -Ryan
>
>
> Barry Smoke wr
I've been playing around with qmail-requeue() trying to change the
destination of certain e-mail. A La. IF the mail is spam, send to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From my limited knowledge I have accessed I need to change this line
print EIN "$sender\0$env_recips";
Lets say I
my $RedirectTo='[EMAIL PROTECTE
Where is "David's spambox patch" found?
-Ryan
Barry Smoke wrote:
We are using David's spambox patch, and have been very happy with it.
spamassassin marks spam, and that spam is forwarded to a spambox,
which we simply delete all the mails in this box every week.
now, we are starting to get
Hi!
I know this issue is discussed in the FAQ - except, that the attached
message doesn't have the usual CR/LF problem... Could someone please take a
look at it and tell me what the exact problem is - so I ask the guy doing
the php-code how to fix his problem ?
Regards,
Brian
message.gz
Desc
James Herschel wrote:
Hello,
I've created a spam gateway using
Qmail-1.03
Qmail-scanner-1.20st
SpamAssassin 2.60
ClamAV
And I currently receive notifications for:
Disallowed breakage found in header name - potential virus
Disallowed MIME comment found in header name - potential virus
The problem
Hello,
I've created a spam gateway using
Qmail-1.03
Qmail-scanner-1.20st
SpamAssassin 2.60
ClamAV
And I currently receive notifications for:
Disallowed breakage found in header name - potential virus
Disallowed MIME comment found in header name - potential virus
The problem is that we receive
Salvatore Toribio wrote:
Salvatore, thanks again for your help. Is this the right syntax in
local.cf? Thanks.
BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
score BAYES_00 0 0 -2.901 -2.900
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam -1.5
In local.cf you only need the last two line
Hi everyboddy
I'm using qs2mrtg to generate statistic page but the virus statistic page
doesn't seem to be realistic. Only some virus per week but I recived a lots of
mails of virus detected
any ideas
--
Sebastian Ezequiel Ovide
Hi,
I'm trying to use the qs's filtering engine, but I've come across a
curious situation - I want to filter emails which have a subject which
matches "Code #".
Unfortunately, I can't get qs's engine to match on # (probably because
it is interpreted as a comment, and the rule it belongs to is i
Salvatore, thanks again for your help. Is this the right syntax in
local.cf? Thanks.
BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
score BAYES_00 0 0 -2.901 -2.900
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam -1.5
In local.cf you only need the last two lines.
score BAYES_00 0 0 -2.90
Salvatore Toribio wrote:
Hi,
Need your helps guys with spamassassin. it's given 99% negative
score now, -4.5/5.0, -4.9/5.0, etc. Somehow i think spamassassin is
confused. I added few whitelist_from in the local.cf file and also
tested content. But my test below resulted with 2.1 core instea
Hi,
Need your helps guys with spamassassin. it's given 99% negative
score now, -4.5/5.0, -4.9/5.0, etc. Somehow i think spamassassin is
confused. I added few whitelist_from in the local.cf file and also
tested content. But my test below resulted with 2.1 core instead of
7.0. I am confused
Hi all,
>From my traffic graphs I saw that there was a large amount of incomming data
on a regular basis, which lead me to beleave my mailserver was rejecting
some message.
Searching though the logging of qmail-smtpd I found these lines which occurs
every time with a message from one specific serv
31 matches
Mail list logo
