On Sunday 11 January 2004 07:04 pm, Jason Haar wrote:
will set that up just to be prepared. I found that I had to replace our
scanner v 1.14 with 1.20 and suddenly everything started working. on our
first test, perl zombied out on me once it got busy. i made a few mods to the
basic system, (rh9
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 22:57:58 - (GMT) Andrew Cranson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been browsing the archives and came across a message saying:
>
> --
> You will have to hack my version of qs. Just add after this code:
> I'm running qmail-scanner 1.20 and that doesn't work for me,
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 11:46:16AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>1. there are zero sized mails in the archive. i ask this 2 years
> ago, but no fix. after looking at qmail-queue.log, i found that
> qmail-scanner will give up when g_e_h fail.
> eg: "g_e_h: no sender and no recips."
> qmail-sc
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 09:39:06PM -0500, Chuck wrote:
> I am currently setting up a replacement for this using redhat 9. This is an
> exact mirror image of the working system, pulling all patched sources from
> it, recompiling under rh9, using errno patches where needed. The qmail system
> wor
Hi,
I've been browsing the archives and came across a message saying:
--
You will have to hack my version of qs. Just add after this code:
#Add envelope details to headers array so that they can be matched within
#perlscanner.
#Note how they're uppercase cf the message header
On Friday 09 January 2004 06:31 pm, Russell Mann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My setup with qmail scanner includes spam assassin, clamav, qmail,
> vpopmail, mysql. Its all good, but most spam I get is misaddressed. I
> used to bounce misaddressed email, but the unbouncable nature of spam got
> me to havin
Hello--
I am having all 4 mails from test_installation.sh getting caught.
Jason, I noticed you posted this in reply to moi meme :
? I've heard of no-one else saying:
* running test_installation.sh triggers "disallowed breakage" events
Also , I found Mads Brodersen saying :
lør, 11 okt 2003
