Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Date RFC

2003-02-28 Thread Germain
Dallas Engelken wrote: > The only date this patch does not effect is the date in the received > headers, which is correct in it's format of DD Month hh:mm:ss > - But the date in the received headers is not correct too if the default locale is not set to english/C. The month is written i

RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Date RFC

2003-02-28 Thread Dallas Engelken
> -Original Message- > From: Cedric Fontaine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 3:09 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]Date RFC > > > Hello ! > > Do you think the next release will be RFC compliant for the Date > format ? > > I'm using

[Qmail-scanner-general]Date RFC

2003-02-28 Thread Cedric Fontaine
Hello ! Do you think the next release will be RFC compliant for the Date format ? I'm using a french spam parser and they told me that qmail-scanner aren't RFC compliants... Any information about that ? -- Cedric - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (DH/DSS)PGP-key Server ID: 0xBDD6E604 --