[Qmail-scanner-general]Can not find any virus scanner.

2003-02-17 Thread xmzhao
Where shall I download virus scanner? --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://li

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Advanced Mail Routing?

2003-02-17 Thread Nick Andrew
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 04:23:12PM -0500, Ernie Cline wrote: > Yes, that I realized ... what I was hoping qmail-scanner could do is > make some kind of mail-routing decision based on certain criteria (like > who the mail is going to). That's procmail's job. Nick. -

[Qmail-scanner-general]Qmail

2003-02-17 Thread Abraham
 hey guys this is an off topic about qmail-scanner.  this is abut Qmail mailgroup capability But Any good suggestion will be appreciated.      1] This is the scenario If a Certain user Sends email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] it would make a copy to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and to [EMAIL PROTECTED] at

[Qmail-scanner-general]Does Vpopmail 5.3.8 fix issues with Qmail-

2003-02-17 Thread Kari Suomela
Monday February 17 2003 12:40, Jason Haar wrote to All: JH> I've had a report that 5.3.8 works fine with Q-S JH> Can some others please check to see if vpopmail still deletes the JH> QMAILQUEUE variable within tcp.smtp, or whether that's fixed now? JH> If JH> so, I'll update the FAQ. I j

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]qmail-scanner error

2003-02-17 Thread Piotr Kasztelowicz
Hello > > >> perlscanner: generate new DB file > > >> ERROR: incorrect format on line 82 - skipped > > >> perlscanner: total of 9 entries. > > 1. There were a *lot* of talks about this "problem" already in this list. > 2. Version 1.16 doesn't generate this warning anymore. > 3. Don't post HTML. Y

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Question about tcp.smtp.cdb

2003-02-17 Thread John Shireley
I'm running RH7.2/x86. Well, I re-ran it again, and this time came out with the same results you did (2131 file size). But I still get this: [root@internal etc]# tcprulescheck tcp.smtp.cdb default: allow connection Shouldn't that reflect what I just compiled into the .cdb file, i.e. only all

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Question about tcp.smtp.cdb

2003-02-17 Thread Keith Hanlan
On 17 Feb 2003, John Shireley wrote: > ..which is weird, because the contents of my tcp.smtp file is > this: > > 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" 10.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" Something is weird: keithh@fs [107]* cat |tcprules /tmp/x /tmp/xx 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" 10.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" keithh@fs [108]

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Question about tcp.smtp.cdb

2003-02-17 Thread John Shireley
I apologize for the newbieness nature of my posting, I'm still learning a lot of this qmail stuff. tcprulescheck /home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb outputs: default: allow connection ..which is weird, because the contents of my tcp.smtp file is this: 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" 10.:allow,RELA

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Vulnerability: Timeout does not work !

2003-02-17 Thread Michel Bouissou
Le Lundi 17 Février 2003 15:58, Nicki Messerschmidt, Linksystem Muenchen GmbH a écrit : > I just tried the same with uvscan. The server terminated the connection > to the email-client, but uvscan still tried to decompress 42.zip. > Qmail-scanner did not kill uvscan, but if I switch from force_unzi

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Vulnerability: Timeout does not work !

2003-02-17 Thread Nicki Messerschmidt, Linksystem Muenchen GmbH
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michel Bouissou wrote: > I discovered and annoying problem using qmail-scanner 1.14: Its > built-in "timeout" protection doesn't work as expected. > Example: > If you use qmail-scanner along with f-prot 3.12b, and feed it with a > "mailbomb" in the for

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Question about tcp.smtp.cdb

2003-02-17 Thread Keith Hanlan
On 17 Feb 2003, John Shireley wrote: > It does sound large, but I have nothing to compare it to. Mysteriously > enough (unless I'm just not understanding this), it grew over the > weekend to roughly the same size. Here's a directory listing: It grew? By itself or did you re-run tcprules? What d

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Question about tcp.smtp.cdb

2003-02-17 Thread John Shireley
It does sound large, but I have nothing to compare it to. Mysteriously enough (unless I'm just not understanding this), it grew over the weekend to roughly the same size. Here's a directory listing: drwxr-xr-x2 vpopmail vchkpw 4096 Feb 17 08:11 . drwxr-xr-x9 vpopmail vchkpw 4

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Vulnerability: Timeout does not work !

2003-02-17 Thread Nik Hug
From: "Michel Bouissou" > Hi there, > > I discovered and annoying problem using qmail-scanner 1.14: Its built-in > "timeout" protection doesn't work as expected. [..] strange - we made a test with 42.zip and everything worked well (we use also f-prot!) . do we have just a happy server? greet

[Qmail-scanner-general]Vulnerability: Timeout does not work !

2003-02-17 Thread Michel Bouissou
Hi there, I discovered and annoying problem using qmail-scanner 1.14: Its built-in "timeout" protection doesn't work as expected. Example: If you use qmail-scanner along with f-prot 3.12b, and feed it with a "mailbomb" in the form of a recusrsive zip file that f-prot will take forever to try d