On Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:11 AM, Jeremy Olmen wrote:
> matching, say if we want to quarantine all messages that have the
> phrase "eat at joes" in it. I've read in the faq you can do header
> matching (for detecting viruses, etc.) but I haven't heard anything
> about body text pattern match
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 00:11:21 -0500 Jeremy Olmen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got a fully functional qmail -> qmail-scanner -> spamassassin
> mailserver up and running and it's been doing well for a number of months
> now. I'd like to know if there is a way to do *body* pattern matching, s
Hello,
I've got a fully functional qmail -> qmail-scanner -> spamassassin
mailserver up and running and it's been doing well for a number of months now.
I'd like to know if there is a way to do *body* pattern matching, say if we want
to quarantine all messages that have the phrase "eat
Every time new email comes through I get the following line in my
maillog:
/var/qmail/.spamassassin/user_prefs
Each piece of email get the following added header (dashes added by me):
-
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=0 required=0
Delivered-To: [EMAI
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 10:29:36 +0700 mulyadi santosa
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how we can block this kind of MIME structure?? can qmail-scanner block
> it?? i have try it with qfilter and finally comes into headache
>
> [start]
>
> --GV7GS598WI728SiMdK118Fa4698eW7P24F9i
> Content-T
hello all
how we can block this kind of MIME structure?? can qmail-scanner block
it?? i have try it with qfilter and finally comes into headache
[start]
--GV7GS598WI728SiMdK118Fa4698eW7P24F9i
Content-Type: application/octet-stream;
name=alink .scr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: b
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 11:55:49PM -0700, Dan Wilson wrote:
> Can someone tell me why this email didn't get scanned through Spam Assassin?
> Obviously by the headers, qmail-scanner went through it, but why no SA headers?
>
> I've determined that the only time it doesn't get scanned is when it's
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 08:29, John Shireley wrote:
It may be a lack of disk space/inode issue, if all has been fine until
now.
> I've been scouring for a solution to this, but I get the error:
>
> 451 qq temporary problem (#4.3.0)
>
> ...when I test the machine directly on port 25. I see soluti
On Tuesday, January 28, 2003 4:34 PM, CertaintyTech wrote:
> I exchanged a few messages with Jason Haar about this and he is
> hesitant to say that ripmime will work since it is such a fundamental
> part of Q-S and would be a significant change. But quite a few
> others do use ripmime.
The change
On Tuesday, January 28, 2003 4:29 PM, John Shireley wrote:
> I've been scouring for a solution to this, but I get the error:
> 451 qq temporary problem (#4.3.0)
What does the log say?
Turn debug on, tail -f qmail-queue.log, start a session, and see what
the log says just before it gives the error
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 22:29, John Shireley wrote:
> I've been scouring for a solution to this, but I get the error:
>
> 451 qq temporary problem (#4.3.0)
>
> ...when I test the machine directly on port 25. I see solutions geared
> toward potential DNS problems, but this is unlikely. I also see
>
> Looking on the Qmail-scanner page, it still lists reformime
> as a requirement
> instead of ripmime. What is involved in changing to ripmime?
> Are there any
> downsides?
>
> Trey Nolen
>
I exchanged a few messages with Jason Haar about this and he is hesitant
to say that ripmime will wor
I've been scouring for a solution to this, but I get the error:
451 qq temporary problem (#4.3.0)
...when I test the machine directly on port 25. I see solutions geared
toward potential DNS problems, but this is unlikely. I also see ones
that discuss permissions issues, but ownership and rights
>
> This won't work because reformime does not recognize the w32/brid-a
> attachment - it sees no attachment whatsoever and therefore passes it
> thru. At this time the only solution that I know is to switch to
> ripmime or use some downstream filter like maildrop/procmail to scan the
> message fo
>
> This may be an old problem, because someone on the sophie
> list told me to
> look in the archives of qmail-scanner. I haven't found
> anything yet, and
> want to bring up the subject again. Sophie misses the
> w32.brid.a virus
> which is a variant of Funlove. I contacted Sophos, and thi
This may be an old problem, because someone on the sophie list told me to
look in the archives of qmail-scanner. I haven't found anything yet, and
want to bring up the subject again. Sophie misses the w32.brid.a virus
which is a variant of Funlove. I contacted Sophos, and this is the response
I
16 matches
Mail list logo
