On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 05:33:09PM +0200, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
> I have two requests:
>
> 1a) would it be possible to add an option like --refuse-on-virus that
> should cheange Q-S behaviour?
> In case of virus, Q-S should simply delete all temporary files, emit a
> "553 sorry, yo
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 12:10:20PM +0100, Anders Gjerløv wrote:
> Status: RO
>
> . Clear:SA:0(1.1/5.0):. Processed in 1.212625 secs); 16 Jul 2002
> 21:40:56 -
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0
Some of the version number checks aren't as robust as they should be. I
don't personally w
I have two requests:
1a) would it be possible to add an option like --refuse-on-virus that
should cheange Q-S behaviour?
In case of virus, Q-S should simply delete all temporary files, emit a
"553 sorry, your message contains "blabla" virus and has been
rejected",
then exit.
This would
Hi,
I've gotten qmail-scanner up and running smoothly. Everything works.
I do however get a very large header with the information in the
/var/spool/qmailscan/qmail-scanner-queue-version.txt file. If I try to
change this file, all emails still go through, but the result is
something like this:
