Here's a quick idea of a mySQL table setup and a few SQL Calls for
Qmail-Scanner:
Most of this should be self-explanatory. I'm not beholden to any of the
table or column names. Comments welcome.
CREATE database qmailScanner;
CREATE TABLE domainpref (
domainid int(11) NOT NULL auto_incremen
hi
From: "Jason Haar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Check your reformime version. This was a problem with old versions I
think.
>
hmmm I've used maildrop 1.4 from source ...
# reformime -v
$Id: reformime.c,v 1.40 2002/03/19 01:29:18 mrsam Exp $
that's as new as possible I think.
Nik
-
A few of you have complained/noted that you didn't like that Q-S gave out
file and dir details as shown at the bottom of this message.
There are (as usual) several ways to deal with this, but I want to hear what
people think of this one:
I intend to now send (up to) three separate alerts: one ea
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 05:59:08AM +0200, Nik Hug wrote:
> And I think I've found the cause for this misbehaviour: All the failed
> messages had something in common: They had multiple Attachments of the same
> name!
Check your reformime version. This was a problem with old versions I think.
--
I managed to catch some of this "failed" emails on a 2nd MX (there is no
scanner
installed).
And I think I've found the cause for this misbehaviour: All the failed
messages had something in common: They had multiple Attachments of the same
name!
Below you can see an example of such "mime-headers
Hello,
I' m desperate :-(
I habe still this "cannot close mimeunpacker"-failure with some emails. I've
made a lot of tests with big emails and different attachments and I couldn't
generate this failure by accident.
Maybe there is an mistake within my run-script of the smtpd?
##!/bin/sh
#exec /u
I think I may have just found at least a part of the problem.
I just checked the F-Prot site for updates, and found that there was a
definition update created yesterday and apparently released today.
I'm thinking at this point that maybe the download was corrupt or
something of that nature.
I j
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 07:54:52PM -0400, Aaron Carr wrote:
> I would certainly like to browse that documentation.
>
??
> However, it's not an overall server resource issue, the server isn't using
> even 25% of the physical memory available. Also, as I mentioned, it was
That's not the issue -
I would certainly like to browse that documentation.
However, it's not an overall server resource issue, the server isn't using
even 25% of the physical memory available. Also, as I mentioned, it was
working great, then it stopped working. That's what through me off. I
tried tweaking the memor
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 07:23:38PM -0400, Aaron Carr wrote:
> Is anyone else having any resource issues with F-Prot?
>
> I just built this mail server this past weekend, and up until today it was
> working like a champ.
>
> Suddenly today, I start getting all kinds of resource errors in the log,
Is anyone else having any resource issues with F-Prot?
I just built this mail server this past weekend, and up until today it was
working like a champ.
Suddenly today, I start getting all kinds of resource errors in the log,
and the server wouldn't send or receive mail. (I've temporarily stopped
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 12:04:04PM -0500, Dallas Engelken wrote:
> qmail-scanner's configure script requires spamc to be present as
> /usr/bin/spamc. It then checks to make sure spamd is functional by piping a
> message through spamc, which should connect to your spamd and give a report.
> if you
Hey
IF i want to usr qmail-scanner how do the qmail
start file to bie
#!/bin/sh# chkconfig: - 2345 100 100export
PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/var/qmail/bin:/usr/local/bin
. /etc/rc.d/init.d/functionscase "$1"
in start) # qmail
itself: echo -n "Starting qmail:
"
At 07:48 AM 7/2/2002, Ron Culler wrote:
>if I pass the spam.txt test file to spamc with the -c -f -u options
>above I get the following result 30.1/5.0.
>If I pass the spam.txt test file to spamc without the -c option I get
>the full report showing the X-Spam status of yes.
The -c switch only re
At 09:39 AM 7/2/2002, Gary MacKay wrote:
>I know this is _not_ an SA group, but QS is not detecting that I have it
>installed. I presume it is installed correctly since I can pipe the sample
>message that comes with SA through it and it detects it. When I run QS
>configure script it sees that i
> I know this is _not_ an SA group, but QS is not detecting
> that I have it
> installed. I presume it is installed correctly since I can pipe the
> sample message that comes with SA through it and it detects
> it. When I
> run QS configure script it sees that it is there, but says it is not
I cut and pasted the local.cf settings and the spamd settings from the
FAQ. Still no luck.
- Gary
Chris Martino wrote:
> You need to be running SA as spamd with the options specified in the FAQ. I
> was having the same problem as you, but once I ran it as stated above it was
> found.
>
> C
>
I know this is _not_ an SA group, but QS is not detecting that I have it
installed. I presume it is installed correctly since I can pipe the
sample message that comes with SA through it and it detects it. When I
run QS configure script it sees that it is there, but says it is not
working and i
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Ron Culler
> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 10:48 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Qmail-scanner-general]Qmail-Scanner and Spamassassin not
> working together
>
>
> I followed the FAQ and setup my local.cf file like the examp
I followed the FAQ and setup my local.cf file like the example.
I start spamd with a RedHat init script spamd -d -F 0 -L -x -u qmailq
my qmail-scanner.pl config has the following spamassassin variables set
$spamc_binary='/usr/bin/spamc';
$spamc_options=' -c -f -u qmailq';
$spamassassin_binary='
20 matches
Mail list logo