Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]multiple TCPSERVER's for per-domain scanning

2002-05-11 Thread chris
Yep, that works, sort of. It appears that the second instance (as in the example) isn't controllable via SVC -d /service/qmail-smtpd anymore. SVC -u /service/qmail-smtpd DOES cause the two instances to start up (by using the & detach correctly) but I can't "down" them... Well, it's better than

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]multiple TCPSERVER's for per-domain scanning

2002-05-11 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 11/05/2002 11/05/2002 -0700, chris wrote: >Hello list, > > I understand that a method of running "per-domain scanning" would be to >use MX records to point to different IP's that are local to your single mail >server running qmail-scanner. Then you would have separate instances of >TCPSERV

[Qmail-scanner-general]multiple TCPSERVER's for per-domain scanning

2002-05-11 Thread chris
Hello list, I understand that a method of running "per-domain scanning" would be to use MX records to point to different IP's that are local to your single mail server running qmail-scanner. Then you would have separate instances of TCPSERVER running that are listening to those IP's. In you

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general][PATCH] CLAM Antivirus support

2002-05-11 Thread Kazuhiko
Hmm. The notification message by qmail-scanner w/ clamav support seems a little bit busy. At Sat, 11 May 2002 10:23:12 +0900, Kazuhiko wrote: > [sub-clamav.pl ] (snip) > &debug("clamav_scanner: $DD"); > > if ($DD =~ /(.*) FOUND/) { This line should be the following... if ($DD =~ /:

Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]notification

2002-05-11 Thread Jason Wong
On Saturday 11 May 2002 04:12, James Beam wrote: > This is from a previus post: > > "Q-S will only notify the recips if it determines that the recipient is a > local mailbox. Therefore make sure the your local domains are part of the > local_domain_array in qmail-scanner-queue.pl. For example my