RE: qmail-ldap run error

sounds like a library problem to me... > -- > From: BoLiang[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 18, 1999 1:35 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: qmail-ldap run error > > Hi > >After I setup the qmail-ldap package on a Redhat5.2, >I run i

new version of qmail

Hi, just wandering when/if the next version is comming out? I see lots of patches and fixes that could be bundled together for a new qmail: ldap, uce, oversize dns, and many more. I always see "qmail 2" mentioned in the mailing list... If there was a turn on/off method for these extras, instead o

RE: tcpserver control on domain name

tcpserver rules only work on ip basis, so change the .mydomain.com to your range of ip adresses and everthing should work just fine. Franky > -- > From: Bart van Kaathoven > (DSN)[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 06, 1999 11:22 AM > To: 'qmail maillist' > S

RE: [PATCH] Resolving MAIL FROM domain

I think you just reinvented the wheel here... > -- > From: Balazs Nagy[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 06, 1999 12:29 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PATCH] Resolving MAIL FROM domain > > Hiyas, > > Nowadays I just bored to get mail from illeg

RE: A couple of smtpd questions..

I'm encountering the first problem as well (hanging defunct smtpd processes). I would like to hear any solution on this matter... Franky > -- > From: Greg Moeller[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 07, 1999 11:12 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: A cou

RE: Virtual Domain/Users not working proeprly

If you don't wan't an extra local account: put virtual.com only in control/rcpthosts. Then in virtualdomains, put the following: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:alias-user1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:alias-user2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:alias-user3 virtual.com:alias-virtual and use the alias files in control/alias: .qmail-us

RE: Bouncing specific users

Perhaps: exit 100 if I'm not mistaking... > -- > From: Peter Gradwell[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 28, 1999 9:30 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Bouncing specific users > > Hi, > > I've recently aquired

RE: Virtual domains using qmail

try putting > lakesedge.org: alias-leorg > in virtualdomains. Let me know if it works then... > -- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 28, 1999 9:43 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Virtual domains using qmail > >

convert netscape mails to qmail

Hi, anybody has a script for converting (or resending) netscape mail messages to qmail format. The netscape mail messages are also in some kind of Maildir format, but when I change the name to (timestamp).$$.`hostname` and I try reading them (using POP3), I get the correct number of messages, but

RE: convert netscape mails to qmail

c: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Re: convert netscape mails to qmail > > Van Liedekerke Franky writes: > > > Hi, > > > > anybody has a script for converting (or resending) netscape mail > messages to > > qmail format. The netscape mail messa

local queue delivery

does anybody know how I can make qmail deliver messeages that are in queue/local, to a remote host?

qmail eats up my memory

qmail version: 1.03 after a couple of hours, the qmail-lspawn process became huge (813M), eating up all my memory and of course blocking everything. Anybody seen this before?

RE: Mass migration off of qmail because of lack of DSNs?

Come on guys, lets get mature and stop any more remarks about sexual preferences of certain people, there are specific newsgroups for things like this. Let's focus on qmail here, shall we? Franky > -- > From: Chris > Garrigues[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 1

strange errorcode

Hi, sometimes when people from the internet sent mail to one of my clients, they get the following back from their emailserver (in this case xs02-078.support.nl [195.114.229.78]) > 451 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... I/O error: Error 0 > Now I know this is not a qmail error message, but does anybody kno

RE: strange errorcode

> Sent: Friday, May 21, 1999 10:56 AM > To: Van Liedekerke Franky > Subject: RE: strange errorcode > > This means that a IO error ocurred in their relay (if they use one to send > email) or on your mailserver (if they don't). > Usually, this means the queue has

RE: Handling mail for "@domain.com" and "@sub.domain.com" to dif

try mailing directly to user2 first. The problem probably lies there. franky > -- > From: Joaquim Homrighausen[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Reply To: Joaquim Homrighausen > Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 1999 2:41 PM > To: qmail discussion list; Simon Woodward > Subject:

stralloc

Hi, maybe this is a stupid question, but my C knowledge is not that big, so I'm asking it anyways: There are a lot of stralloc calls in qmail, does this memory never needs to be freed again? Franky

databytes

Hi, I have a small question about the databytes control file: does a mail first get stored on local disk before the size is checked? Becuase if so, a client can send mails of 10 GB... they won't go through, but they would block the server completely... Franky

RE: How to log the qmail-pop3d connection

Isn't this patch logging to syslog? I ask this because most people log using the splogger utility, and I try to avoid using syslog. Isn't there a way (patch) to let qmail-popup log to stderr itself? Only the exit codes from checkpassword are significant, and they are interpreted in qmail-popup.c

qmail + sslwrap

Hi, has anyone succeeded in using sslwrap together with tcpserver for qmail-pop? And would that person mind sharing his experience? Thanks! Franky

RE: qmail + sslwrap

e? Franky > -- > From: Chris Johnson[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, November 29, 1999 5:47 PM > To: Van Liedekerke Franky > Cc: 'qmail list' > Subject: Re: qmail + sslwrap > > On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 09:24:42AM +0100, Van L

RE: How do you get off this blasted list.

Like it is mentioned in the headers of each mail from this list: have you tried [EMAIL PROTECTED] for instructions? Franky > -- > From: G. Ryan Fawcett[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 6:15 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: How do y

qmail site down?

Hi, is there a problem with the qmail site http://www.qmail.org ? Or is it just me again ? Franky

multilog

Hi, first of all: Merry Xmas and a very happy NewYear to all !! Now I have a small boring question: does there exist any tool or manner to select a timewindow out of a multilog file (for ex. the last 5 minutes) or do I need to write one myself? Franky

RE: multilog

nd am looking for a better way. Franky > -- > From: Russell Nelson[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 30, 1999 3:43 PM > To: 'qmail list' > Subject: Re: multilog > > Van Liedekerke Franky writes: > > Hi, >

daemontools and qmailanalog

Hi, just a quickie: does qmailanalog handle the timestamps from the new daemontools package? Franky

pop3 and ip adres logging

Hi, does anybody know a quick hack to log the ip adres in a pop3 session without setting tcpserver to verbose mode? Franky

RE: pop3 and ip adres logging

gt; Subject: Re: pop3 and ip adres logging > > Van Liedekerke Franky wrote/schrieb/scribsit: > > does anybody know a quick hack to log the ip adres in a pop3 session > without > > setting tcpserver to verbose mode? > > # cat /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d-log > #!/b

moving part of the queue

Hi, as part of performance increase, I'm thinking of moving part of my qmail queue/mess dir (half of the subdirs there ) to another disk and creating symbolic links to there. I suppose qmail still functions then (after I've run queue-fix)? Do I need to pay special attention as to which dirs I mov

rcpthosts and locals

Hi, can qmail be changed in such a matter that, instead of (or next to) using the rcpthosts file, you allow all domains that have as Mx record (primary or backup) your own specified network range. And for locals the same question: allow all domains that have as mx record your own IP address. Fra

linux and reiserfs

Hi, I've two questions: 1) I'm planning on using qmail with Redhat linux for a high-load machine (hardware raid scsi disks). Now I don't want to know which linux is better, but I would like to know what extra tuning the operating system requires? Does hdparm can boost the HW raid I/O performance

qmail, linux and large scale environment

Hi, I would like to ask if anybody uses qmail in a large scale environment running on linux (redhat), because I'm interested in how people configured their system (number of filedescriptors, max childs per process, max running processes,...) Could those who use it please mail me their findings an

RE: max RCPT TOs and RFC821

btw, there's already a patch going around that does this, you can use that one and configure the controlfile to accept only 20 rcptto's. It would violate the RFC I guess... F. -Original Message- From: Markus Stumpf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: vrijdag 12 januari 2001 2:47 To: [EMAIL

RE: qmail w/ reiserfs on linux 2.4.1

You need to patch qmail to work correctly with reiserfs, not the kernel. Greets, franky -Original Message- From: Matthew Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: woensdag 31 januari 2001 14:53 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: qmail w/ reiserfs on linux 2.4.1 I know it is still very ea

RE: Has anyone used qmail with xfs on Linux 2.4?

try using the 2.4.1 kernel, which has built-in reiserfs support (a good journaling system) and adapt the small changes to qmail in order to work reliable under reiserfs, see http://www.jedi.claranet.fr/qmail-reiserfs-howto.html Franky -Original Message- From: Sid Wilroy [mailto:[EMAIL PR

RE: "Too many Cc: patch" ?

there's a maxrcpt patch on the qmail page F. -Original Message- From: Lukasz Komsta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: woensdag 18 april 2001 8:52 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: "Too many Cc: patch" ? Has anyone heard about a patch which rejects incoming mail (as badmailfrom) if there i

qmail and multiple MX records

Hi, I have a small question: if qmail sees an MX record with multiple IP's for the same domain, will it always use the same IP or will it do a random use of the IP's ? Thinking about djbdns, I know it is expected for this functionality to be in the client (here qmail) so I wonder ... I know it is

RE: ANNOUNCE: qmail now works with the diet libc

Just wondering if this is the complete truth. I think most of the time memory isn't a problem but CPU is, and I don't see/know if this diet libc is decreasing CPU load. More concurrency leads to more memory usage but also to more CPU susage. Of course I could be wrong here :) Greets, Franky --

RE: I think I'm being relayed through, but I don't know how.

We all do someday :) I always feel stupid two minutes after I tried convincing my boss the logic of something... -Original Message- From: Chris Garrigues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: vrijdag 8 juni 2001 3:24 To: qmail list Subject: Re: I think I'm being relayed through, but I don't k

linux filesystem

A while back there was talk about a good filesystem for linux (next to ext2fs). Anybody remebers how this is called, and does anybody use it with satisfaction? I have looked through the archives, but I'm just not able to fill in the right search terms to find the answer... Franky

RE: linux filesystem

Yes, ReiserFs was the one I was looking for! Anybody using it on high-volume mail servers? Franky > -- > From: Charles Cazabon[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 4:35 PM > To: Van Liedekerke Franky > Cc: 'qmail list'

serialmail

Hi, I'm using the serialmail package to let some people initiate an smtp connection to their server whenever they make a pop connection, so all mail gets delivered. Now I don't use an alias for this user, so I have to rewrite the headers all the time for this user so that the prefix "alias-" is p

percenthack

Hi, for a specifi application, I would need percenthack to work with qmail-ldap. I've first send my question to that list but got no answer, maybe somebody here can point me in the right direction. I have in my percenthack file (and in control/locals): testdomain.be Now when I sent a mail to:

RE: AtDot and qmail

I've used Atdot some time ago, and I found it is still buggy: problems with showing CC, retrieving messages through pop, But I found that most problems can be fixed..., see the Atdot mailing list, a number of qmail fanatics are on there as well... Franky > -- > From: aw[SMTP:

delivery question

Hi, when I see in my qmail logfile the line: 933356713.693024 info msg 298536: bytes 1566 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 3602 uid 1008 933356713.821501 starting delivery 95162: msg 298536 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] 933356713.821579 status: local 1/120 remote 0/120 933356713.945498 delivery 95162

RE: Thanking Dave Sill

I totally agree on this! Franky > -- > From: Russell Nelson[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 1999 3:25 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Thanking Dave Sill > > Dave Sill writes: > > What do your logs say? > > I want to take a moment to p

RE: Web Mail on Qmail.

Here are my links (Atdot seems easy enough, but still a little buggy, good to try out. I like cwebmail a lot, with a little adjustments to handle cc and bcc and stuff): Hope this helps, Franky http://www.comnex.net/cWebMail http://webmail.woanders.de http://www.netbula.com/anyemail http://ww

RE: Web Mail on Qmail.

SQWebMail needs to run on your popserver, that's not always what you want... Franky > -- > From: Adam H[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 09, 1999 3:34 PM > To: Amit Vadehra > Cc: Qmail Mailing List > Subject: Re: Web Mail on Qmail. > > What about S

RE: Web Mail on Qmail.

Yeah, I know, that's why it needs to run on the same machine where the mailboxes are stored, and this is usually your popserver (unless you use nfs). Franky > -- > From: Adam H[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 09, 1999 5:25 PM > To: Van

RE: 20,000 mailboxes...

check out the ldap patch then... > -- > From: Ira Abramov[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 1999 4:47 PM > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: 20,000 mailboxes... > > On Tue, 10 Aug 1999, Magnus Bodin wrote: > > > One of the biggest swedish ISP:

RE: make errors

on Solaris, this is standard included, just make sure the directory /usr/ccs/bin is included in your path. Franky > -- > From: Mark Sherman[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 1999 3:12 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sub

RE: SQWebMail or IMP?

look in the archives, a week or two ago their was a thread about webmail solutions. Franky > -- > From: Martin Paulucci[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 19, 1999 5:19 PM > To: Michael Wand; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject:

tcpserver and rate/time limit

Hi all, I know tcpserver can limit the number of concurrent connections, but can t also limit the number of connections for a specific period of time for one ip adres, lets say 100 connections for an ip adres in 5 minutes? This to stop mailbombers and MS servers running wild (because of stray lin

RE: qmail-ldap on gateway

yep > -- > From: Mark E. Drummond[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 1999 4:16 PM > To: qmail Mailing List > Subject: qmail-ldap on gateway > > I run qmail on my MX host, relaying mail to my internal mailhub. > Can I use qmail-ldap to verify rcpt a

qmail and forwarding

Hi all, I have 2 servers (A and B) here, and mails are being forwarded from A to B in the following way: when a mail arrives to A, it gets processed first and then (in a .qmail file) it is decided this mail should be forwarded to B. Now a forward mail first gets back in the queue from A, which do

RE: limiting the file size of bounces ?

their is a patch available for limitting bounce sizes. Maybe it is still on the qmail pages, otherwise search in the mailarchives (someone recently posted it again). Franky > -- > From: torben fjerdingstad[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 1999 9:34 A

size of locals

Hi, just a small question: how big can the size of locals get out of a performance point of view? For rcpthosts it is said that, when more than 50 entries are in it, one should use morercpthosts as well. But what is the equivalent for locals? Franky

RE: Patch for spam

don't reinvent the wheel. If this is what you want, use the anti-UCE spam patch from Sam (see qmail pages) Franky > -- > From: Hotdog[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 16, 1999 7:00 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject

RE: Mailer-daemon returns full message

there's a patch to limit the bounce size, see the qmail page or in the mailing archives. Franky > -- > From: Jan Stanik[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 1999 7:47 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Mailer-daemon returns full message > >

RE: smtp server as a relay

This is also within the standard functionallity of tcpserver, but I don't believe it is secure to allow relaying based on email address only. Franky > -- > From: Ana Belén Santos[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 1999 11:45 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECT

RE: smtp server as a relay

ntos[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 1999 12:09 PM > To: Van Liedekerke Franky > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: smtp server as a relay > > > > > Van Liedekerke Franky wrote: > > > This is also within the

RE: A patched qmail-smtpd.c

Isn't the first feature of your patch a standard tcpserver feature? And you even say inetd is not supported, so you use tcpserver... Franky > -- > From: Hotdog[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 24, 1999 10:48 AM > To: [E

RE: HELP! Spammers!

It seems you're being an open relay, if they can get away with [EMAIL PROTECTED] How is your tcpserver configured? Do you have an rcpthosts control file? > -- > From: Tero Niemi[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, September 24, 1999 1:53 PM > To: qmail > Subject:

number of qmail-remote processes

I have a weird problem here (long mail, I hope everybody understands what I'm trying to say here...). my system: qmail 1.03 on Solaris 2.6 (disks under control of disksuite, mirrored disks are being used). I saw this afternoon 5000 messages in my queue (most of the mails to one of my own machine

return code for stray new lines

Hi,m can anybody explain to me why the reurn code for stray new lines is 451? This causes the other site to keep the message in the queue, but it will never get fixed, so it will never get delivered as well... So why not use 550 as the return code? Franky

RE: return code for stray new lines

red Lindberg > Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 1999 3:28 PM > To: qmail list > Subject: Re: return code for stray new lines > > On Wed, 29 Sep 1999 14:32:34 +0200, Van Liedekerke Franky wrote: > > >can anybody explain to me why the reurn code for stray new

big-todo patch +queue-fix

HI, just wondering if, after I applied the big-todo patch, I can still use the queue-fix program? Franky

qmail-send single threaded

Hi, I'm experiencing serious problems (slow queue processing) with qmail (sol 2.6), and I think the bottleneck is qmail-send. When I do a truss on this process I see (truss -c): hercules(root)/var/qmail/queue/intd> truss -c -p 19880 ^Csyscall seconds calls errors read .01

RE: Return message problem.

The control file queuelifetime does this for you. Place in there the number of seconds you want a message to stay in the queue (default = 604800 = one week). Franky > -- > From: Super-User[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Reply To: Super-User > Sent: Thursday, September 30,

RE: Limit TO+CC list

There's a patch on the qmail page for this: it limit's the number of rcpt to's in the smtp protocol, which is what you want. Franky > -- > From: B. Engineer[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, October 04, 1999 5:37 PM > To: qmail list > Subject: Limit TO+CC lis

qmail-smtpd log question

Can anybody explain the following in my qmail-smtpd logfile: > 939075841.506429 qmail-smtpd 2410: connection from 192.168.100.1 ( unknown > ) to zeus.telenet-ops.be > 939075956.824641 qmail-smtpd 2410: message queued = 939075956 qp 2411 > 939075956.824970 qmail-smtpd 2410: read error, connecti

RE: pop3d auth error after auth ok? LDAP patchs,whoops #2

This is a small bug from the ldap patch. Andre has already a solution for this. Andre, could you post the solution on the qmail-ldap list? Franky > -- > From: Bill Rogers[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, October 14, 1999 5:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subjec

RE: forward and keep mail

put the following in .qmail: > &[EMAIL PROTECTED] ./Maildir/ (for storage in Maildir format) ./mbox (for storage in inbox format) > -- > From: Martin Staael[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 1999 2:44 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject:

RE: qmail eats up my memory

bulous! And it just keeps on working... > ------ > From: Van Liedekerke Franky[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 29, 1999 3:04 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: qmail eats up my memory > >

FW: qmail eats up my memory

he figured it out > -- > From: Fred Lindberg[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Reply To: Fred Lindberg > Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 1999 6:02 PM > To: Van Liedekerke Franky > Subject: RE: qmail eats up my memory > > On Tue, 2 Feb

RE: mail for nonexistent user: wrong bounce?

Hi Sam, in your patch, I have disabled the REJECTNOSUCHUSER otherwise my ldap users don't get any mail (or am I wrong?). Maybe then I should enable BOUNCEMAIL_INTERNAL as well? > -- > From: Sam[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 04, 1999 2:06 PM > Cc: [

RE: server error?

I didn't have any problem with it before and I'm using the same client for 5 months now (netscape). I just noticed this behaviour today. > -- > From: Petr Novotny[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 08, 1999 4:50 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re

hotmail and qmail

Hotmail is using qmail, aren't they? They seem to be in great trouble because all email for hotmail.com remains stuck in my queue. Or is it only here, maybe a resolver problem?

queue summary

Hi, is there a tool available to give a summary of what's in the queue? Something like: x mails queued for first.domain xx mails queued for second.domain yy mails deferred for third.domain If not, I'll write one myself (using perl of course) Franky

RE: max nbr of mails in time

I would not identify users, just use their ip adresses, as given by tcpserver. > -- > From: Mark Delany[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 25, 1999 2:29 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: max nbr of mails in time > > At 01:07 PM 2/25/99 +0100

RE: How to monitor qmail-send and friends?

try using spong (Son of Pong), it works great for us here: checking upness, services (http, ftp,...) disk space,... everything you want (if you know perl). Franky > -- > From: Samuel Dries-Daffner[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Reply To: Samuel Dries-Daffner > Sent: Thursd

RE: ETRN, qmail-1.03 and etrn patch v0.1f

I've read the page about etrn, and I think the author made some mistakes (at least on his first page, I'm saying anything about the code). Maildir2smtp does NOT require a seperate queue to be created: you just let the mail be delivered at a normal mailbox, and when the person connects using POP3,

RE: qmail Performance question

You also should check if your dns server can resolve your clinet's ip address, otherwise it waits for a timeout (I think that one is 26 secs). Franky > -- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, March 22, 1999 11:22 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

RE: What goes in the official patch?

I have a couple of suggestions as well: - the patch that deals with oversized dns packets - the patch that limits the number of RCPT TO's - the tarpitting patch - the patch that limits the size of the bounce mail - of course: one of the UCE patches (I like Sam's patch a lot, which already combine

RE: mailq

I thought there was qmail-qstat and qmail-qread? > -- > From: William Burrow[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 1999 4:57 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: mailq > > Is there anyone interested in a mailq like program for qmail? One which > list