Peter Drahos writes:
> Hi,
>
> Can anybody explain to me what these warnings mean and why do the
> files(e-mails) with no group appear in a first place and are being
> deleted???
>
> Tx Peter
>
> Jan 17 04:45:14 ebox : Security Warning : Group Unowned files found :
> Jan 17 04:45:15 ebox
> Hello everybody!!!
>
> I am using qmail1.03 on a rh7.0.
> I would like to use qmailadmin 0.39. <--
check the site for updates regulary
> but I can't log in, I need 'postmaster' but I don't know who is he.
He is the default which you get when you do a ./home/vpopmail/bin/vadddomain
somedomain.
"Boris Krivulin wrote"
> Hi,
>
> I would like to run qmail behind NAT. The local machine is called
'galois',
> with ip number 192.168.1.6. The router is locally called 'euler', and
> globally is accessible by 'hypervolume.com'.
I have an extremely similar setup.
My router is called NS1.DOMAIN
Matt Simonsen wrote:
> Is it possible/adviseable to run a Qmail server to authenticate all relay
> SMTP traffic so that we can leave the relay open but not allow spammers
> access? I have Qmail running with Courier IMAP server, my problem is that
we
> have some users with laptops who travel and u
Hello,
I am just curious will this work on OpenBSD 2.8?
or will I have to add them with my editor.
FreeBSD 2.2:
# pw groupadd nofiles
# pw useradd alias -g nofiles -d /var/qmail/alias -s /nonexistent
# pw useradd qmaild -g nofiles -d /var/qmail -s /nonexistent
# pw useradd qmaill -g nofile
Hello,
I have been running qmail on Linux (RedHat and Mandrake) for a few months
now and I am growing interested in switching to OpenBSD for many obvious
reasons.
I did try a "ports" install of qmail and watched what was happening, and
saved the ports version of what was needed for the user ids
- Original Message -
From: "Brad Dameron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Anyone have a good example of using the tcpserver rblsmtpd with qmail?
>
> I am currently using "/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -c 120 -D -x
> /mail/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u 501 -g 500 0 smt
> p /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1 | /var/qm
- Original Message -
> From: "Tom Beer"
> The problem ís the Id "SV" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes
> that I receive up to 40 times a day 5*40=200 minutes, quite a lot.
> Any help is welcome thanks Tom
Hi,
I am pretty sure that djb changed his instructions for daemontools
ht
>From: "Dave Sill"
> "Rick Updegrove" wrote:
> >I am pretty sure that djb changed his instructions for daemontools
> >http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/svscan.html#boot and linux somewhat recently.
> Correct. It was definitely changed since LWQ was writt
> - Original Message -
> From: "R vdB
> Subject: Telnet to smtp takes long respond time
> When I telnet mydomain.xs4all.nl at port 25, it takes a minute or two for
my
> linux qmail server to respond. I don't like this because mail is often
> delivered with long delayings and maybe it has
Hi all,
I am getting this message "You have new mail in /var/mail/root" every day on
my new OpenBSD 2.8 machines running qmail. I want all of that mail to go to
either to a remote host or to a local Maildir depending on the machine. If
anyone has done this please give me a clue. I usually ju
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Sill"
Subject: Re: OpenBSD 2.8 & "You have new mail in /var/mail/root"
> > "Rick Updegrove" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I am getting this message "You have new mail in /var/mail/root" every d
From: "Michael Handler"
> Why would you want to do that? Did you read the manpage for mailer.conf?
No, I admint that I didn't, but now I did. However, I am no smarter than when I
started. It does
not contains any references to qmail, only examples for sendmail and postfix.
from man mailer.co
Hello,
It is probably just me, but one of my domains started creating this extra
directory named "0" as you see illustrated below. Is this a feature or a
misconfiguration on my part somehow?
I am still using vpopmail 4.9.9 I have downloaded 4.9.10 but everything is
working so well I would h
Robin S. Socha writes:
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):(/home/robin)$ cat /usr/ports/mail/qmail/files/mailer.conf.sample
> # Configuration for mailwrapper is kept in /etc/mail/mailer.conf.
> # Replace that file with this one to enable qmail under a sendmail
> # disguise. Very useful.
>
> sendmail
Rick Updegrove writes:
Ok I did find this thread
http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2001/03/threads.html#00
800
I am prety sure it was "Henning Brauer" who wrote:
> in OpenBSD you shouldn't touch /usr/sbin/sendmail, you should modify
>
Henning Brauer writes:
> The two lines above are enough for normal operations. you can point the
> other stuff to /usr/bin/true or so.
Thank you very much.
Rick Updegrove writes:
> Therein lies the irony, he stopped short of the line in question which is
> "/var/qmail/bin
> Can anyone suggest some patches that will give me:
> Virtual POP/SMTP (IMAP would be nice)
vpopmail
> A web interface to add/delete/change passwords/setup forwards (auto
> responders would be nice)
qmailadmin
> Only 1 IP per server
> Niceties:
> mySQL backend
> simple way to count and bill
- Original Message -
From: "Rehan Zaidi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> to run under supervise...almost.
> /usr/bin/tcpserver -v -R 0 pop-3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup \
> /usr/local/bin/checkvpw /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir
I had a hell of a time also - mainly because I did NOT include the
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I need to implement a log for the POP service. Any suggestions?
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I need to implement a log for the POP service. Any suggestions?
my /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d log/run script
#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t /var/log/qmail/pop3d
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi,
> I am doing something wrong...
>
> run:
> #!/bin/sh
> exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:/usr/local/bin" \
> tcpserver -H -R 0 pop3 \
> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup smashweb.com \
> /usr/home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir
>
> log/run:
> #!/bin/s
From: "Rick Updegrove" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Oops I always do that ...
> p.s.
>
> This guy even uses softlimit in his log/run script, I think I shall update mine asap.
> http://www.flounder.net/qmail/qmail-howto.html
Actually that is NOT softlimit, see http://cr.yp.
> Now change "POP3" to "pop3" and run it again. Go on... humor me. It's
And if that doesn't work try pop-3
or
type more /etc/servicesthen scroll to where port 110 is listed - use that exact
spelling OR
make the /etc/services file say POP3
Mine says:
pop-3 110/tcp # POP
From: "Steven Katz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>The message could not be sent because one of the recipients was
>rejected by the server. Server Response: '550 relaying to
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> prohibited by administrator'. (Account:
>'[EMAIL PROTECTED]', SMTP Server: 'mail.idma.com', Erro
Charles Cazabon said,
> You have two tcpserver instances, both trying to bind to the same interface(s)
> and port. At least one of those _has_ to be failing, and it should be showing
> up in your logs.
Steve said,
>>At which point, doing 'sh -x /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/run'
>> gives me:
From: "Subba Rao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I have followed the instructions on DJB's site to install and start svscan.
>
> On Linux and other SVR4-based systems with /etc/inittab, add SV:123456:respawn
> :env - PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin svscan /service >/dev/console 2>/dev/console
From: "|nix ZixinG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -R disables IDENT
> -H disables reverse DNS lookups
Actually thats not always enough. I had -H and -R and still had the dreaded
slow response times. http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/tcpserver.html says (and LWQ
should also)
-l localname: Do not look up the l
From: "davidu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -o Please check the FAQ's at http://cr.yp.to/ for qmail.
> -o Please read and/or search the archives. It is rare these days to get a
> question that hasn't been answered.
> -o If you are going to post to the list, please include REAL logs,
> unaltered that cov
From: "Essy Ren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Can I use qmail in open BSD ?
> thanks
Yes. In fact here is a quick qmail howto for OpenBSD
(provided you have the ports.tar.gz uncompressed in /usr) and are connected to
the Internet
cd /usr/ports/net/ucspi-tcp; make; make install
cd /usr/ports/sysutils/d
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 8:53 PM
Subject: Newbie
> Hey all, I am trying to get qmail to work with MRTG, I am at a complete
> loss here
> If anyone can help, it would be great,
https://mail.socha.net/stats/ has a
From: "Jens Hassler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I've set up QMail as stated in the "Life with QMail" document and everything
> works fine. The POP3 server is started over inetd, because its a very low
> traffic server:
I suggest that you supervise it and see what happens. AFAIK LWQ does not
reccomend
From: "Rick Updegrove" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I suggest that you supervise it and see what happens. AFAIK LWQ does not
> reccomend that you use inetd and neither does anyone on this list.
Oops I always do that. LWQ does still suggest using inetd for a "a lightl
From: "John Kuhn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> the problem
> it's seems no matter what I put in /etc/tcp.smtp anyone can relay mail off
> my server it will not deny anyone I've taken everything out besides the
> localhost address and recompiled with tcprules
Once I forgot to run ./config-fast FQDN in th
From: "Ed Weinberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> What is all of this? My mail program cannot read it, and I will not
> try to launch it.
>
> smime.p7m?
Ed, I am guessing that your MUA, "Forte Agent 1.8/32.548" cannot properly
decipher a "Digitaly Signed" e-mail? Or you have possibly misconfigured it
s
From: "Massimo Quintini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> How can I use an URL short (like mail.te.astro.it) instead of
> mail.te.astro.it/cgi-bin/sqwebmail
Like so many other people suggested, this is what I use:
(this probably got wrapped - my apologies)
bash-2.04# cat /var/www/htdocs/mail.updegrov
From: "Hank Wethington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I have no idea what the problem would be... I've been a lookOut user since
> lookOut 97, have had to use off and on OE as well (damn I hated those jobs)
> and have never encountered this problem. I have seen messages to big to DL
> over a 56k line bef
37 matches
Mail list logo
