Hi all,
Sorry for the OT but I was wondering if anyone knew of a
non-GUI based MUAs that groks Maildirs, as simple as say
binmail? (I don't need/want any fancy features)
I guess I could do a dirty perl hack but I don't grok
Maildirs and its features myself yet, so thought I'll
ask you folks fir
Hi (lol),
>
> for i in /dev/gf*; do
> touch $i
> strip $i
> unzip
> fsck
> fsck
> fsck
> fsck
> yes
> yes
> yes
>
Hi all,
I just wanted to thank all of you who had responded to
this OT question (semi OT since Maildir is included? :).
To my surprise,
within an hour, I received over 10 responses with all of
them mentioning mutt, and I thought to myself - there must
be something very good that I've been missi
Alexander Jernejcic wrote:
>
> hi,
> only for my interest: was this from Money Maker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ?
> i received that today.
>
> ;) a
YUP!
cheers,
jamie
ps
maybe I should start including all spam-email addresses I have received
in the past in my signature so they could harvest thei
Hi Robin,
"Robin S. Socha" wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I just installed open-smtp by Russ Nelson. It does Not Work(tm). The
> tcprules-file gets overwritten as expected (?), but there are '"'
> missing:
>
> (root@kens):(~)$ cat /etc/tcprules.d/qmail-smtpd
> 212.84.219.13:allow,RELAYCLIENT=
[ver
Hi,
While thinking this over, I became confused so I was
wondering if someone could shed some light on adding
an outgoing-only qmail server to a network/domain.
Any docs, references, etc, for pointers are very much
appreciated.
What I would like to do is this:
host1 -> primary MX for incomin
Hi Dave,
Dave Sill wrote:
> OK, so where are you stuck?
oops, sorry ;)
I must have sent out the message in the middle of my racing
thoughts.
I was wondering whether to include host2 also as an MX in the
dns records although host1 is the only MX handling incoming and
part of outgoing (none fro
Hi Dave,
I just wanted to thank you for giving me clarity (which also
set off a number of chain-reactions in my head :).
Best regards,
jamie
#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#
-- If somebody can help create a search engine for my room,
I will call them
Hi all,
I apologize if this was covered before.
I am having probles after my fresh qmail install, and being
new to all of this I am a little confused with what is going
on.
BTW, qmail is working great and I think its awesome.
Situation:
In my lan I am testing qmail on my two LINUX boxes.
Sendi
Hi all,
Thanks for your responses.
I still don't know how duplication actually occurs ;(
but the problem went away :) .
I RTFM a littly more thoroughly - qmail-inject
(I'm sorry I didn't do that more earlier.)
man qmail-inject, quoted, about the 6th line from the top:
"DESCRIPTION
qmail-inje
Hi,
I'm not familiar with BSD's either since I never worked with
them, but I also suspected that maybe it is a CPU over-heat.
In my case, I was over-clocking a little bit but it was a
CYRIX 233 ( what'd you expect ;) ) and it mysteriously
kept going down.
Of course, I cant interpret oops logs
Hi,
I was wondering if somebody could help me out with the syntax
to multilog.
Please bare with me and my dumb question since I am not the
one at "production level" yet with qmail...and heck, this may
not be a multilog thing at all.
In my /var/qmail/rc I have the following:
(snipped from lwq -
Hi Mark,
(apologies for the late response, fell asleep on my
keyboard, almost dos/overflowing the term *grin*)
I just wanted to thank you for your guidance, it works
like a charm now, along with more clearity of related
issues which were running through my thoughts.
> FAQ 7.7 makes an ancient
Hi,
I'm not an experienced programmer nor a kernel hacker so
I thought I should ask all you gurus before I proceed,
or if I should't proceed at all ;)
SITUATION:
My compile session stops when setting the conf-spawn to
1000 (after applying the big-todo and big-concurrency
patches, successfully.)
Hi Peter,
Thanks for your response.
Peter van Dijk wrote:
> FD_SETSIZE is not a kernel variable, it's just used by the macro's
> for handling select() fdlists. Adding a -DFD_SETSIZE=2048 (yes,
> that's without the __) to the correct conf-file in the qmail source
> should do the trick.
oops (*
Hi Peter,
Thank you again for your input again.
Peter van Dijk wrote:
> Hmm. Could be that the linux select() isn't as flexible
> as the FreeBSD select (yes, wild speculation here ;)
> Did you try with __FD_SETSIZE? It looks like the GNU libc include
> structure is more complicated and obscur
Hi P.Y. Adi Prasaja,
(forgive me, I wasn't sure how to call you without being rude :)
"P.Y. Adi Prasaja" wrote:
> How about raising the __FD_SETSIZE value on /usr/include/bits/types.h
> itself? And, don't forget to touching chkspawn.c ...
It worked like a charm! Thank you.
(whew, sleepless nig
Hi Daniel,
net admin wrote:
>
> I replaced sendmail with Qmail 1.03 and now SEndmail is sending too many
> error messages from cron jobs trying to check the queue every 30 mins.
> How to stop this madness?
> I get this error email message:
> cron: Sendmail: /usr/sbin/sendmail -q
>
> illegal o
Hi Jay,
"Austad, Jay" wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, I installed the boxes that need the modification
> with an rpm. I suppose this will possibly screw things up if
> I use some binaries from a tarball and some from the possibly
> modified rpm version.
I just accomplished patching the big-concurre
Hi Jay,
"Austad, Jay" wrote:
>
> I grabbed the source rpm and just applied the patch to it and
> rebuilt it. Works great.
Congrats!
Please teach me how you did it!
> Except, FD_SET is limited to 1024 descriptors.
Don't you hate it when that happens? ;)
> How do I change this? I assume I c
Hi Jay,
"Austad, Jay" wrote:
>
> Here's what I did to rebuild the rpm:
[snip]
Thanks for the information!
I gotta get used to building RPMs...
(after all, I am using an RPM distro ;)
> As for the FD_SET problem, Dell sucks and ships a RAID card
> that requires a proprietary driver on their so
Hi Jay,
"Austad, Jay" wrote:
> I had both of my QMQP servers bouncing off of the 120 limit
> yesterday, and they were pretty much idle (Dell 2450's with
> 2 striped 9GB 10k rpm drives).
Which RAID level?
I remember somebody mentioning in this list that 0+1 will perform
faster than 3 (or 5 obvi
Hi Adam,
Adam McKenna wrote:
> You need at least 3 disks to do raid 5, and 4 to do 0+1. Since
> he mentioned that he only has two disks, and that they are "striped",
> it's pretty likely that he's talking about raid 0.
oops. sorry, you are right...it was 4:20 AM...
(kernel back trace: ff
23 matches
Mail list logo
