What file do I need to create in the control
directory to enable relay control? Actually I would like to enforce User Name
and Password Authentication from anything incomming to qmail.
Secound question.. What happened to www.qmail.org
--JT
I've been updating our relay rstriction security in
tcpserv but while testing I noted that if I attempted to send a message to
nobody%nobody.com (note the % instead of @) it actually acepts the message but
bounces it back to me with a no local user error...
How do I make it to where it does
t and respond back with the No Relaying Aloowed response which is
what I would like Qmail to do...
--JT
- Original Message -
From:
Ihnen,
David
To: 'James Stevens' ; Qmail
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 2:16
PM
Subject: RE: Hrmm, question on relay
restric
Can someone point me to a web page that has some explanation of setting up
concurrent running qmails on the same machine and what edits I need to make
to avoid conflicks..
Thanks in advance..
--JT
elays and maybe just
maybe my server might get above a 5% load avaerage for the first time in
it's life.
Anyways if anyone has actually done this please point me in the right
direction I'd really appreciate it. ;)
--JT
- Original Message -
From: "Goran Blazic"
Thanks! I was hoping it was that simple...
--JT
- Original Message -
From: "Ricardo Cerqueira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 5:29 PM
Subject: Re: Running Multiple Copies of Qmail on the same server...
for another instance.
>
> make sure to both qmail instances are started in your
> init script.
>
> --
> Michael Boyiazis
> Mail Architect, NetZero, Inc.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Goran Blazic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesd
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'James Stevens'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Michael Boyiazis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Qmail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 5:50 PM
Subject: RE: Running Multiple Copies of Qmail on the same s
Laugh, ok wheres that Fiber Trunk and gigabit card I ordered?
--JT
- Original Message -
From: "Ihnen, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'James Stevens'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Michael Boyiazis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Qmail"
ROFL, ok.. I feel small now ... ... ... ...
--JT
- Original Message -
From: "Austad, Jay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'James Stevens'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 5:56 PM
Subject: RE: Running Multiple Copies of Qmail on the s
d" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "James Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Qmail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 9:29 PM
Subject: Re: Running Multiple Copies of Qmail on the same server...
> Thus said "James Stevens" on Tue, 10
Raise Hand...
--JT
Ok this is weird I have the autoresponder installed and vmailmgr
installed and everything is working as far as vertiuals are concerened.
The problem I am having is with the auto responder script itself. When I
send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] the message arrives triggers the
autoresponder which
Well let's see.. Been Managing Unix systems for about 5 years now .. Did
start on Mac's then Windows then Unix so yeah I kinda went the long way
but I have been using Outlook Express almost since the beging.. It has
just been recently that I have started using other MUA's ... However I
don't r
t;>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 12/12/00, 11:22:18 AM, Aaron "L." Meehan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
regarding Re: Outlook Express Prank:
> Quoting James Stevens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
&
How many people here on this list actually open up an executable that was
sent to you via email before scanning it anyways???
--JT
- Original Message -
From: "Scott D. Yelich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Keith, Yeung Wai Kin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, Janua
Thanks, that worked.. ;)
Earthlink.net is another one doing the same thing. I also added them to
smtproutes which resolved the problem..
earthlink.net:[207.217.120.28]
--JT
- Original Message -
From: "Jesse Sunday" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Bill Nugent" <[EMAIL PROTE
Exactly.. I have 7 instances of qmail running on a Linux box (don't ask why
its a rather long complicated story) and has been that way for about a year
now.. No lost messages or anything. Just make sure your running the big
concurrency patch. Other than that as far as performance .. It does work
f
You could always be mean like me and block out the entire IP range
using tcprules.. IE: 216.42.:deny
But that's on the extreme side.. Will stop him cold from conecting to
your server but no one else from the ip range will be able to send you
anything either.. Then he could always goto somepla
You are correct ;) Sendmail can only sustain one exsistance of it's
delivery object meaning it can't multithread like the newer MTA's soo
when sendmail runs a large q say 10k messages all those messages go into
q and get piped out through one thread instance of sendmail whereas qmail
simply fi
Yes, it's sad but true...
--JT
>> Original Message <<
On 4/25/01, 5:07:13 PM, "Brett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding
RE: max concurrency for qmail is 500, what's it for sendmail?:
> no way can it be 1. that would be ridiculous and yet...
> -Original
You can basically take the difference between the two and stick it up a
nat's a** ... Or at least thats my observation.. Everything I have read
so far goes with what ya say chris... But just for the fun of it why
doesn't everyone here on the list get together and will write up our own
standard
g to set something very similar up as we're going to be sending out
> large quantities of mail to several different mailing lists (not spam).
But
> we can't find any info regarding clustering and/or load balancing for
mail
> servers. Also, have you gotten blocked from any
nt mailing lists (not spam).
But
> we can't find any info regarding clustering and/or load balancing for
mail
> servers. Also, have you gotten blocked from any servers with such high
> concurrencies? Thanks again. I appreciate any help.
> Brett.
> -Original Message
ya!'
--JT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 4/25/01, 5:18:57 PM, Markus Stumpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
regarding Re: max concurrency for qmail is 500, what's it
ya!'
--JT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 4/25/01, 5:18:57 PM, Markus Stumpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
regarding Re: max concurrency for qmail is 500, what's it for se
> Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
> (Dennis Ritchie)
Good GOD!!! I'm an idiot then
--JT :)
Sorry Charles, I believe he got distracted by me.. I'm the one with the
Mandrake 8 box that it is working on and we were communicating via email and
not the list.. So the reason why he hasn't gotten to it yet was because of
me.. Anyways, he's done everything I have done and he is still having the
but thats when I know it
will work and it always does so it's just a habit of mine now... Laugh
--JT
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Cazabon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 6:04 PM
Subject: Re: RE: RE: RE: Problem w
side note on this... I had the same problem about 6 months ago from a mom
and pop type hosting outfit.. I called them to ask them what was up and
after about 30 mintes of them telling me there was no problem we hung up and
I was ready to ban them from my entire network.. Then mysteriously about an
Ok, tell me this list has a black list attached to it please .. ;)
--JT
- Original Message -
From: "John Groseclose" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 4:55 PM
Subject: Re: AS SEEN ON NATIONAL TELEVISION
> At 4:51 PM -07
No, I show them well under the 512 limit.. Even then if the 'bigtodo-dns' I
believe it's called is installed then what does it matter??? I am correct
right?
--JT
Network Administrator
http://www.webcommanders.com
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Cazabon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAI
grrr hate it when I forget to reply to all...
--JT
- Original Message -
From: "James Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Charles Cazabon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 10:38 AM
Subject: Re: Hotmail, CNAME lookup failure, zone transfer..
Looks like I'll be doing a project involving Mac OSX Servers here in a few
days which will involve installing qmail among other components. I just
caught a few hits on it from staff members here a little bit ago.
Anyone got notes they can share with me??? ;)
Would be much appreciated
--JT
Netwo
I had a similar problem however my resolve to it was to take an *OLD* 286 I
had laying around install a fairly bare installation of Linux on it and
installed the DNS service. Then I put that online behind my firewall and
added it's IP for port 53 to my NAT/Firewall and assigned it as the primary
D
I take that back, it's a 386... Drrr
Writting the message on it made me log into it just to check up on it been
awhile
--JT
- Original Message -
From: "James Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "David Balatero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Chin Fa
I beg to differ...
I have a list of 40k I'll use to race ya.. Hell I'll even let you use a list
of 10k to race my list of 40k.. Me using qmail and you using Sendmail.. I'll
even go beyond that I'll limit the bandwidth my server can consume to
1600kb/s and you can use whatever you want.. I'll stil
ly configuration)? Then make it listen only
on 127.0.0.1 and make this the primary resolver for the machine.
w
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 11:32:53AM -0700, James Stevens wrote:
> I had a similar problem however my resolve to it was to take an *OLD* 286
I
> had laying around install a fairly
> In a message dated Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 11:21:35PM +0300, Mike Jackson
wrote:
> > James Stevens wrote:
> > > I had a similar problem however my resolve to it was to take an *OLD*
> > > 286 I had laying around install a fairly bare installation of Linux on
> >
Wait a minute now... Who said anything about straight?
--JT
- Original Message -
From: "Adam McKenna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: Netgear RP114 Router doesn't work well with Qmail POP daemon?
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 11:14:
man, if it were me I'd kill all mail services and
wipe the queue clean .. Check the qmail home page there are a few queue repair
and fix tools avaliable... But simplest way is to rm- R queue and then either
(depending on how good you are) retouch the queue to set it up again or the
simpler a
Standardized Bonehead Reply Form
Hrmphhh So I will take it for granted this is coming from a bonnifyed
bonehead then?
Be nice will ya..
Enough said I've been up almost 48hrs now upgrading three Linux Boxes..
Night all
--JT
- Original Message -
From: "Lukas Beeler" <[EMAIL
Pushy little prick isn't he???
Best Advice we can give you.. Learn C code and go write your own because you
are obviously not going to listen to us. Ofcourse then again if ya got money
then hey I'm all ears what ya want and how much cash ya got? Otherwise see
ya in cyberspace.
--JT
P.S. Anyone
Okay couple questions..
1. In qmail how can I force it to go by both MX and
A records as opposed to just A records?? I have found that qmail seems to
have a problem when it can't resolve the A record even though the MX is fully
resolveable to an IP...
2. Is there any way to view whats ac
Talk about a brain fart
--JT
- Original Message -
From: "Jerry Hsieh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Qmail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 6:40 PM
Subject: Spamming .
> Hi,
>
> I would like to get into the spamming business and I have a basic qmail
> server setup
Hrmm, I am having the same problem I have a bunch of '@#' files...
I know the numbers are the microsecounds and thats all fine and dandy but
qmail does not seem to be crunching these into a permanet log file.. Hrmmm,
am I mising something here?
--JT
- Original Message -
From: "Ges
46 matches
Mail list logo
