RE: Encryption and t-shirts

2000-02-25 Thread Edward S. Marshall
On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, Dave Kitabjian wrote: > Front: "Don't queue mail with sendmail" > Back: "Send mail with qmail" All I need to know is where to send a money order. ;-) -- Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Encryption and t-shirts

2000-02-28 Thread Edward S. Marshall
or some such. But then again, I have no taste, so take this with a grain of salt. I'll also second the request for higher-quality material. Heavy-weight shirt or sweatshirt is definitely what I'd prefer, personally... -- Edward S. Marshall <[EMA

Re: qmail, Mailbox and finger

2000-11-18 Thread Edward S. Marshall
hat understand that your mailbox is in the user's home directory. Seach freshmeat.net for possible alternatives. -- Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.nyx.net/~emarshal/ --- [

Re: RBL gone crazy?

2000-12-14 Thread Edward S. Marshall
or that list. It'll certainly do nothing but worsen the signal-to-noise ratio here. -- Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.nyx.net/~emarshal/ --- [ Felix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. ]

Re: Is there a good IDE for GNU C/C++?

2001-02-13 Thread Edward S. Marshall
something about it at http://www.redhat.com/ . -- Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://www.nyx.net/~emarshal/ --- [ Felix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. ]

Re: spambait?

1999-10-21 Thread Edward S. Marshall
an RBL-style list, so as to make the information more easily queried? Have the auto-submissions simply add the address to an RBL-style DNS zone, and you're all set. Anyone with an RBL-aware system (which is damn near anyone, these days) can then use your blacklist, and storage/expirati

Re: We need Home Workers!

1999-10-25 Thread Edward S. Marshall
al/rblcheck/ (And yes, I'll hopefully have a new release out soon. Working for a living and hobbies of any kind don't seem to mix well... ;-) -- Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ What goes up, must come down. ] http://www.logic.net/~emarshal/ [ Ask any system administrator. ]

Re: We need Home Workers!

1999-10-26 Thread Edward S. Marshall
On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, Mate Wierdl wrote: > So rbl does not do wildcard blocking like *.flash.net ? No. The RBL blocks by IP address ranges, and only those hosts that show specific problems. Domain names never enter the picture. -- Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Wha

Re: Million users

1999-02-02 Thread Edward S. Marshall
eap PC hardware, without hiccups. Tells me a lot about that "Sun resilience". ;-) > Sure. I'd have Linux instead, but I can't imagine either having > significant difficulty pissing all over NT/Exchange. I don't think anyone will disagree there. ;-) -- Edw

Re: claim: qmail uses more bandwidth

1999-01-13 Thread Edward S. Marshall
some stats today on the linux-kernel list regarding what that machine has to put up with. And now that anonymous CVS has been closed, deliveries are back to the 1-2 hour range. Not bad, considering the number of subscribers, the level of traffic, and the spread of exploders. -- Edward

Re: Off topic: Open relay

1999-03-03 Thread Edward S. Marshall
On Wed, 3 Mar 1999, Petr Novotny wrote: > sorry for the off-topic: Where do I report open relay complaint > (other that the postmaster at the site)? Thanks http://www.orbs.org/ -- Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ What goes up, must come down. ] http://www.logic.n

Re: Off topic: Open relay

1999-03-03 Thread Edward S. Marshall
On Wed, 3 Mar 1999, Michael Bracker wrote: > At 16:58 03.03.99 , Edward S. Marshall wrote: > >http://www.orbs.org/ > > is this the place where bad guys coming in the RBL? Is there any place to > inform these people? www.orbs.org hosts a system (ORBS) which allows you to ente

Re: auto pgp signing all outgoing emails

1999-03-05 Thread Edward S. Marshall
swords in a safer manner (stdin). (Before anyone jumps on me: I know that this information is private on sane operating systems. I'm pointing out that it's a bad idea on a few rather popular ones.) -- Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ What goes up, must come down.

Re: qmail bandwidth usage versus other MTAs

1999-01-13 Thread Edward S. Marshall
the management of a large list (a list for dog owners), not from being a list member. All you see, as a member, is the people who post. Not the lurkers, whose numbers can be in the thousands. (Just for fun, I'll see if I can get a by-domain breakdown from the current listmom of that list.)

Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail

1998-12-30 Thread Edward S. Marshall
ith open source projects, more eyes are always a good thing. (For anyone who thinks my decision was because of the author: nope, personality issues never even came into it. With the bickering I've seen between DJB and Weitse, I wouldn't run EITHER product if personality meant anything to

Re: Vendors and tied hands

1999-01-04 Thread Edward S. Marshall
favor of his licensing, or against it) are wasting our time. I've got better things to do than argue about this, such as getting the latest Postfix beta up and running on another machine. -- Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ What goes up, must come down. ] http://www.l

Re: Three solutions for spam

1999-01-18 Thread Edward S. Marshall
On Mon, 18 Jan 1999, Len Budney wrote: > "Edward S. Marshall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm not going to cry over 1%. Sorry. I don't think many ISPs using this > > scheme will either. > > That's too bad. My palm pilot has its own MTA, and

Re: Three solutions for spam

1999-01-18 Thread Edward S. Marshall
timate mail? Of course. Anything else would be a disservice to them, and a legal liability to me. -- Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ What goes up, must come down. ] http://www.logic.net/~emarshal/ [ Ask any system administrator. ] Linux labyrinth 2.2.0-pre7-ac6