Thus said Dave Sill on Thu, 18 Nov 1999 15:43:43 EST:
> While I was writing LWQ, I had several people ask if they could
> translate it. I suggested they wait until version 1.0. I never heard
> back from any of them.
Looks like you'll be stuck using babelfish... :)
Andy
--
+== Andy ==
Thus said Marlon Anthony Abao on Tue, 23 Nov 1999 13:27:17 +0800:
> is there any command-line tool that i can use? mutt is too interactive for
> me.
> i was thinking along the lines of processing the entire maildir using a
> shell script.
You might have a look at this perl script... You can t
Thus said Van Liedekerke Franky on Mon, 06 Dec 1999 09:32:16 +0100:
> is there a problem with the qmail site http://www.qmail.org ? Or is it just
> me again ?
Well, it has been pretty slow in the past but it definitely is down
now... :0
Andy
--
+== Andy == TiK: garbaglio ==+
Thus said abc on Fri, 03 Dec 1999 14:01:26 +0700:
> At 09:16 02/12/99 -0800, Michael m. Honse wrote:
> >
> I think there should be message trailer like at the PGP - Users Mailling
> list, maintained by Fred , to prevent this incident anymore
It wouldn't matter if there was a trailer---they wouldn
Thus said "Ari Arantes Filho" on Thu, 09 Dec 1999 19:14:54 -0200:
> Supose I'm supervising the qmail queue and see a message with (2
> attachments of 2mb each for 5 different addresses). This message will
> consume a lot of my link, so I want to send this message during the night.
> How to do
Thus said [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 10 Dec 1999 08:54:46 +0100:
> qmail-send needs a real restart to reread concurrency info. There is a patch
> that allows you to start/stop delivery without restarting qmail, it's somewhere
> on www.qmail.org.
Would an ALRM be enough or does it require a full re
Thus said [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 10 Dec 1999 09:02:06 +0100:
> Reading helps.
Yes, I did read, however, I would rather avoid another patch if
possible... :) Plus, it wasn't for my sake but the sake of Ari.
> I typed 'needs a real restart' but 'There is a patch that allows...'
Define 'real r
Thus said Ranjan Koirala on Sat, 11 Dec 1999 15:58:32 +0300:
> How can I restrict the incoming mail size for each user before smtp
> handshake. I have managed to get the .qmail-toolarge file working
> perfectly. But it works only after smtp handshake, which is not very useful
> for larger mail se
Thus said Greg Moeller on Thu, 16 Dec 1999 08:58:02 CST:
> How does everyone handle their daemon mail with Qmail?
> We get anywhere from 2400 to 20,000 Email in that mailbox per day.
> Wading through it can become a little tedious.
You could setup aliases for root and postmaster and maybe a few o
Thus said Albert Hopkins on Thu, 16 Dec 1999 10:55:38 CST:
> Has anyone heard about the release date of the O'Reilly qmail book? I'm
> really looking forward to this book as I am having trouble finding good
> documentation on the Net.
Wow, I haven't heard anything about a qmail book... if there
Thus said [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 16 Dec 1999 22:12:33 MST:
>
> Here are some coupons for you. No need to register your
> E-Mail address or anything else. Just print and save.
> Merry Christmas !!
>http://www.nobull.bigstep.com/generic.html;$sessionid$DYSB0EBJTWGIHUVHBMWYZA4S1PX0?pid=27
Thus said "D. J. Bernstein" on 19 Dec 1999 16:18:57 GMT:
> If you don't receive any messages on Monday or Tuesday, or if you see a
> message to list.cr.yp.to stuck in a queue on Thursday, let me know by
> sending a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't anticipate any problems; the
> new software i
Thus said Peter Cavender on Fri, 31 Dec 1999 01:50:05 EST:
> Has anyone noticed that if you have your hardware clock set to UTC
> but the Linux clock to local time, that regular messages have the
> local time time-stamp, but bounce messages are dated in UTC?
The hardware clock should probably b
Thus said "Mark Maggelet" on Sun, 02 Jan 2000 01:29:33 PST:
> @4000386f36191f0ac50c tcpserver: fatal: unable to bind: address already used
> I'm getting tons of these lines in my logs, what would cause it?
> what port is tcpserver trying to bind to?
Did you possibly enable the smtp port in yo
Thus said Bill Ataras on Tue, 04 Jan 2000 15:53:34 PST:
> Just curious what people are using to read/send mail from X. I was using
> netscape (SMTP/POP) that came with my redhat dist, but wanted something
> with more features (multiple POP accts, filtering etc). I've been playing
> with "spruce"
Thus said Andy Bradford on Fri, 07 Jan 2000 12:39:00 MST:
> I used exmh. It is a fairly configureable MUA and will do most of what
Oops, make that 'I use' exmh---as I'm sure a lot of you have noticed by
looking at my headers. :)
Andy
--
+== Andy ===
Thus said "Subba Rao" on Tue, 11 Jan 2000 18:47:56 EST:
>
> Is it possible for Qmail server to be authenticated using PGP key, to avoid the
>wrath of being
> rejected by the Dialup Users List (DUL)? Is there any mail server authentication
>procotol using
> digital signature?
You might consider
Thus said Curtis Generous on Wed, 26 Jan 2000 03:58:21 EST:
> Are there any standalone, fast HTML -> TEXT convertors
> available that would convert message body information on the
> fly?
You might try to conjure up something with sed or even perl. I'm not
certain how much overhead each would
Hello all,
Just a quick question about using tcpserver to start qmail-pop3d. When
setting up qmail-smtpd it is possible to use tcpserver to accept
relaying by setting RELAYCLIENT="" in the tcprules database file. Is
there any similar variable that can be set to tell qmail-pop3d to deny
login
Thus said Uwe Ohse on Thu, 09 Mar 2000 06:16:39 +0100:
> well, that doesn't sound terribly useful. Why don't you use
> 194.:deny
> or something like this in a tcprules file (and tell tcpserver to
> use the cdb file)?
Hmm, well that isn't exactly what I meant---I guess I stated my problem
wrong.
Thus said "Timothy L. Mayo" on Thu, 09 Mar 2000 01:26:37 EST:
> The default is to accept unless you explicitly add a
>
> :deny
So I have learned. Did it and it works. Thanks for the help.
Andy
--
+== Andy == TiK: garbaglio ==+
|Linux is about freedom of choice
Thus said the fragile art of existence on Fri, 10 Mar 2000 21:22:10 +0200:
> Hi.I get this when i send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ezmlm-manage: fatal: I do not accept messages at this address (#5.1.1)
> Any ideas ?
Is DIR/public missing?
Andy
--
+== Andy == TiK: garbaglio =
Thus said Otis Gospodnetic on 16 Mar 2000 22:08:53 PST:
> [root@nmlinux1 alias]# telnet localhost 25
POP3 runs on port 110. :-)
Andy
--
+== Andy == TiK: garbaglio ==+
|Linux is about freedom of choice|
+== http://www.xmission.com/~bradipo/ ===+
P
Thus said chas on Sun, 19 Mar 2000 06:08:15 +0800:
> I just rebooted the machine and have not yet started
> tcpserver and qmail-smtp, and suddenly I find dozens
> of qmail-remote processes running. (see below)
If you are certain that none of the daemons have been started, then is
it possible t
Thus said "Racer X" on Sat, 18 Mar 2000 14:41:20 PST:
> All those qmail remote processes are sending out that spam mail you
> thought you got rid of. My guess is that the stuff is still in your
> local queue, so use qmail-qstat/qread to check and see.
> qmail-smtpd/tcpserver do not need to be ru
Thus said "Petr Novotny" on Mon, 20 Mar 2000 14:55:47 +0100:
> > Ho can I disable this behavior ?
>
> There's no way. Send two copies to mailbox, two copies are written
> into the mailbox. As far as I can see, that's the correct behaviour.
Sounds like an instant replay of last weeks question a
Thus said "Don Wright" on Mon, 20 Mar 2000 10:10:50 CST:
> qmail list is not doing this, or is someone along the line deleting the
> additional header info?
qmail should have no need to do this.
> If only BCC is being defeated (it is no longer blind) then this is a serious
> security considerat
Thus said Randy Bradley on Tue, 28 Mar 2000 08:49:58 CST:
> Sorry to intrude.
>
> Instructions in the header or footer would be nice.
They actually are in the headers... look for the List-unsubscribe:
header. :-)
Andy
--
+== Andy == TiK: garbaglio ==+
|Linux
Thus said Philip Mores on Wed, 29 Mar 2000 10:17:12 +0800:
> How can I configure pine using Mailbox instead of using
> /var/spool/mail/user ? I tried following the procedure but it doesn't
> work. Pine has an error something like "no folder".
I believe if you set MAIL to $HOME/Mailbox pine will
Thus said "Timothy L. Mayo" on Wed, 12 Apr 2000 13:53:39 EDT:
> Please do NOT use HTML on this list. :) Quite a few of us use pine or
> mutt to read our mail.
Yes, I'll second that motion. Please no HTML. It always makes quoting
very ugly. :-)
Andy
--
+== Andy == TiK: garba
On Wed, 12 Apr 2000 12:47:47 PDT, "Bruce" wrote:
> I find the general acceptance of HTML mail to be alarming.
I abhor HTML email, but what can one do? It would be a good idea if
all the *newbies* to the Internet could be somehow trained before
getting *online* but alas, that would be a hope w
Thus said Peter van Dijk on Fri, 14 Apr 2000 08:58:27 +0200:
> WTF?
>
> Why is this mail in text/html only? Is this some kind of sick joke?
I believe so... it is because he wrapped his entire message in HTML
tags... not necessarily HTML, but it was definitely an HTML only email
without a corr
Thus said Joergen Persson on Sun, 16 Apr 2000 19:41:59 +0200:
> Giulioo's server seems to be case sensitive, take a look at the following
> example:
I don't believe it is case sensitive at all... I did the same and I get
the error message as well.
[bradipo@sicilia bradipo]$ telnet 204.144.231.
Thus said Gabriel Ambuehl on Tue, 18 Apr 2000 14:58:00 +0300:
> Do you mean this seriously? I can't see a problem with a secondary
> which is using exactly the same config (we normally clone our systems
> as the first one except for the lack of the entries in local or
> virtual... As long as your
Thus said Ian Shaughnessy on Thu, 20 Apr 2000 10:24:00 PDT:
> One of my users has been signed up to a number of mailing lists, and he is
> now unable to access his Maildir/cur or Maildir/new directories. I as
> root can not touch them either.. ls reports a segmentation fault. Du does
> as well,
Thus said Dave Kitabjian on Fri, 28 Apr 2000 12:12:44 EDT:
> We had a situation with a customer who was consulting for a college. So
> every few days, she had to send a 10MB PowerPoint file to about 50
> recipients at that college. Under qmail, a separate thread was opened up
> for each qmail-rem
On Mon, 8 May 2000, Soffen, Matthew wrote:
>If you notice.. The date on the mail is Thursday... Some mailer somewhere
>held it up in transit it would appear..
Or the date on his computer is wrong... :-)
Andy
-
+- Andy --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -+
| Grea
Thus said "Keith Warno" on Thu, 18 May 2000 12:44:29 EDT:
> What do ya think of people actually saving the initial messages they get
> when they subscribe to the list?
What I find amusing is that they are intelligent enough to subscribe
themselves, but then when subscribed they suddenly lose th
Thus said Lindsay Haisley on Fri, 19 May 2000 02:00:03 CDT:
> A bare line feed is considered 'obsolete syntax' as defined subsequently in
> section 4.1, 'Miscellaneous obsolete tokens'. Please note from the above
> that while compliance with this draft requires that originating MTAs or
> MUAs mu
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000 16:33:21 +0200, "Frans Haarman" wrote:
> I see constant disk activity when using daemontools to
> monitor qmail.
It is possible that the programs being spawned are exiting, in which
case supervise will start another copy. This could be due to any
number of things. For exa
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000 17:27:17 -0300, Luis Bezerra wrote:
> Unable to open local messages
>
> I verified in my server that the messages are located in in the
> Maildir/cur directory.
What MUA (mail reader) are you using? Most likely it doesn't
understand the Maildir method for storing emails.
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000 11:53:25 EST, wrote:
> I am trying to move to Qmail from Sendmail. My main server is at a
> remote location, so I want my email to a machine on my local network.
> It was working fine with Sendmail on both machines. I set up Qmail on
> the local one, but below is what I g
Thus said Kari Suomela on Tue, 26 Sep 2000 14:55:33 EST:
> I don't have a dot-qmail at all! Should I have one, where, and what
> should it contain?
If you aren't using any dot-qmail (as in a .qmail-something file) then
how is it possible that qmail is trying to deliver to:
< | /var/qmail/bin/
On Mon, 02 Oct 2000 18:22:51 -0300, Eric Dahnke wrote:
> we can send html formatted messages. can we send an html email which
> includes a form or link that when submitted would contact a web server
> and refresh the original html message with new cgi generated content?
You sure can... I don't r
On Tue, 03 Oct 2000 11:39:08 PDT, wrote:
> I note you say you have "virtually unlimited coming in" so in your
> .qmail file for that particular alias you could go*:
>
> | [ `wc -l` -gt 2 ] && echo Too big && exit 100;exit 0
> &remote-address
Shouldn't that be `wc -c` ? I thought -l counte
Thus said "Jos Okhuijsen" on Wed, 04 Oct 2000 02:21:53 +0300:
> Isn't there really any programmer (group) out there who can write a
> better windows solution to replace this free outlook express?
Unfortunately, or maybe fortunately, they are probably developing
those better solutions for UNIX
On Wed, 04 Oct 2000 16:16:49 -, Petr Danecek wrote:
> Badrcptto does not look at the 'Received:' lines, does it?
> A good solution might be to patch qmail so that it will not bounce a
> message back if it sees a suspicious 'Received:' line in the header. What
> is the best way to do this?
I
On Thu, 05 Oct 2000 11:08:38 EDT, Dave Sill wrote:
> Yeah, AFS *looks* good on paper... Know anyone who's actually using
> it? What do they think of it?
What about Coda? Is it a viable solution for a distributed filesystem?
It has been in development since 1987 if I remember correctly... You
Thus said "Scott D. Yelich" on Thu, 05 Oct 2000 20:13:14 MDT:
> you're all gonna make me pull out a unix(1) story
> that I wrote over a decade ago
If this thread goes on, at least have the decency to prepend to
the subject so that it will get filtered by those who do not wish to
discuss this
Thus said Greg White on Thu, 05 Oct 2000 22:09:35 PDT:
> Please, let me be the first:
>
> http://www.halisp.net/halisp/reply-to-harmful.html
You stole all my glory. :-) But maybe I can add:
http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html
Which are some good suggestions, though not 100% supported by all.
Thus said "jim" on Sat, 07 Oct 2000 12:22:34 EDT:
> I want to send a pager notification whenever new mail that has entered my
> inbox. To page someone with my pager is:
> @paging.acswireless.com. The alphanumeric text on my
> pager would say something like, "You have a new email message!" whene
Thus said Ronny Haryanto on Sat, 07 Oct 2000 16:36:34 CDT:
> Mutt understands "Mail-Followup-To:" (MFT) and can be set to honor
> that header. If you tell Mutt that you are subscribed to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] then it will generate the appropriate MFT header
> (see mine). Later on if another Mutt us
On Mon, 09 Oct 2000 15:58:58 +0200, "Marco" wrote:
> Is it possible to install Qmail (and possibly manage it subsequently) so that it can
>respond to port numbers and ?
> If so, what should I do?
Yes, it is possible. You need to change the invocation of tcpserver to
use port ins
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000 00:37:37 -0300, Pupeno wrote:
> and of course the mails stays on the queue without being delivered.
> The directory /home/pupeno/Maildir exists:
> drwxr-xr-x 2 pupeno pupeno 512 Oct 9 21:19 Maildir/
How did you create the Maildir? Did you use maildirmake? If not, y
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:46:05 GMT, wrote:
> Hi guys how are U, am having problems with my qmail, it has been running
> stable for the past 8 or so months.However, last week it started perfoming
> in wierd way. My users on the mail server are not recieving their mails
> infact the mail queue is gr
Thus said "James Stevens" on Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:38:01 PDT:
> list at a time without a queue delay Right now 'Majordomo' funnels all
> messages into qmail via qmail-send and anything that gets queued after that
> has to wait for the current queue to get done. To get around this I plan on
> se
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000 22:04:14 PDT, Mike Glover wrote:
>Okay, so does anybody know of a "real" MUA that is X-enhanced?
> Sorry, but "pretty" is more of a concern to me than "works
> properly in strange situations". I would prefer "not outright
> broken" and "not vaporware", though.
I persona
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 19:12:42 EDT, Chris Johnson wrote:
> If I were troubleshooting a communication problem between two hosts, and on one
> end of the connection was some piece of Microsoft software, and on the other
> end of the connection was some software written by Dan Bernstein, can you guess
Thus said "James Stevens" on Wed, 11 Oct 2000 08:04:13 PDT:
> Nod, I agree.. However the people I work with and especially my boss are all
> in love with Majordomo and I even bring up the subject of moving to another
> list server and I get stared at So I'm stuck with Majordomo and qmail.
Hm
Thus said szq79 on Thu, 12 Oct 2000 06:03:45:
> I have linux and qmail installed. You know, as a webmaster, sometime send a letter
>to everyone is needed for a webmaster.I don't know how to do this.Please tell me.
There are a number of ways to approach this of which here are two:
1. put all
Thus said "Aaron Newcomb" on Fri, 13 Oct 2000 23:19:48 EDT:
> Notice that the HELO and the MAIL FROM: lines have completely different
> domains. The MAIL FROM they are using is a bogus address. What is the best
> way to prevent email like this from being accepted?
Without some hacking you won't
Thus said "Todd McGuinness" on Sat, 14 Oct 2000 15:27:06 PDT:
> authetication config... The error I receive in the browser window is:
> server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration. I have a
> couple users on this site and I don't really want to set up virtual
> domains, but I do wan
Thus said "Aaron Newcomb" on Sun, 15 Oct 2000 01:26:30 EDT:
> Yes. That makes sense. I knew there had to be a way. Thanks for the help.
> The most offending address is 210.133.28.162.
Ok Aaron,
This host is definitely a spammers delight---it's known as an Open
Relay. This means that it will re
Thus said "Yamin Prabudy" on Tue, 24 Oct 2000 13:31:42 +0700:
> My friend forwad it to me from http://www.orbs.org/otherresource.html
The URL is actually:
http://www.orbs.org/otherresources.html
I suggest you read it and then take your pick which you want to use...
When qmail is configured p
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 20:57:22 BST, "ROD" wrote:
> I have read qmail-send but still i'm still a bit unclear to how to doit.
> Would
>
> info.@thenewdawn:ezmlm-test
>
> send anything with info.*@thenewdawn to the ezmlm-test?
>
> e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 20:57:22 BST, "ROD" wrote:
> Would
>
> info.@thenewdawn:ezmlm-test
>
> send anything with info.*@thenewdawn to the ezmlm-test?
>
> e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry about that last blank email... I accidentally hit ctrl-s instead
of ctrl-d. :-)
Anyway, no you cannot use wild
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 15:35:07 MDT, Andy Bradford wrote:
> thenewdawn.com:thenewdawn
I think I made a mistake... I believe it should be:
thenewdawn.com:alias-thenewdawn
Andy
On Wed, 25 Oct 2000 20:12:14 +0200, "Mark Weinem" wrote:
> Are there any search tools (like grepmail) for Maildirs?
Well, you could use a combination of grep and find maybe... or even
iterate over the files found by find and grep on those, whatever... I
can think of a number of different possi
Thus said "Hubbard, David" on Thu, 26 Oct 2000 23:31:01 EDT:
> verify that since I don't have a mailer to try it with
> but it seems that you'd never want the 451 in this case
> because obviously it will be the same mailer that will
> retry each time and it will continue to be broken for each
> t
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000 14:50:46 +0200, "Wilson, Frank" wrote:
> This means of course, that when mail.web-trade.com is down, the mail will be
> stored localy in the postmaster account on be.wise.no.
You must have configured it do deliver email locally then. If you
simply accept the mail and not de
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000 07:56:05 EDT, "McGillicuddy, Dennis" wrote:
> - sent a blank email to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" .
> (several times)
It is possible that you aren't actually on the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
list, but on one of the sublists. Look at the headers of the messages
you are receiving to find
Thus said Daniel Augusto Fernandes on Fri, 27 Oct 2000 14:07:49 -0200:
> You should look at the mail header of this message and see what's your
> address.
> The very first (mostly) is something like this:
>
> > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unfortunately, the return-path may not always be av
Thus said Adam McKenna on Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:51:03 EDT:
> That's why ezmlm creates a random tag for each subscription that is sent back
> to the subscriber for confirmation. There is no way to subscribe someone
> else to an ezmlm list unless you have access to their mail spool.
Then, what is t
Thus said [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 27 Oct 2000 23:26:33 GMT:
> I have noticed that it is possible to send infected messages
> with sqwebmail running qmail-scanner.
> I guess sqwebmail put messages directly in the queue, so it
> no qmail-smptd is called and no antivirus is used.
I don't see how
Thus said "Anthony Abby" on Sat, 28 Oct 2000 22:29:41 EDT:
> Can someone point me to documentation or just tell me how I can filter out
> ALL attachements to my smtp server. I'm using Qmail solely in a listserver
> environment and I want to make sure that zero attachements get through. I'm
> ne
Thus said [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 29 Oct 2000 01:00:11 MST:
> > and have your *real* address that you give out to people who you want to
> > have a stable address be user-@domain and be careful about
> > revealing that . :)
>
> That's a good idea Russ.
It is a very good idea, however, you ha
Thus said Brett Randall on 28 Oct 2000 22:28:51 +1100:
> A better alternative, IMHO, is to use a certain anti-spam e-mail
> address (someone on this list uses it but I can't remember who) that
> only lasts like a week, and then its gone. This gives most ppl enuf
> time to reply. This won't cut do
Thus said "Anthony Abby" on Sun, 29 Oct 2000 15:38:38 EST:
> Andy, I appreciate the advice, but I like LISTAR much better. The feature
> set looks to be fuller to me than does EZMLM. All I want to do is strip out
> attachements at the SMTP level. Is that possible?
No, it is not possible to st
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000 12:28:09 +0100, Enrique wrote:
> Qmail doesn't support "return receipt". Any solution for this?.
Return receipt is not at all a function of the underlying MTA. All you
really need is to include a Disposition-Notification-To header in every
outgoing mail with the address th
Thus said Brett Randall on 03 Nov 2000 13:44:59 +1100:
> In-Reply-To (note caps)...I will make it case insensitive for future
> cases. Apologies to Phil and anyone else who has received this
> error...
I believe all headers should be treated case insensitive... :-) Kind
of nice that it's worki
Thus said Jens Georg on Sat, 04 Nov 2000 19:49:57 +0100:
> > echo 10485760 > /var/qmail/control/databytes
>
> is this really enough ? i remember to read once that qmail has to be
> compiled specially to use this feature.
Yes, this really is all that needs to be done---no special compiling or
p
On Wed, 08 Nov 2000 14:24:11 GMT, "Michael Vorburger" wrote:
> I need to implement a New Mail Notification; not for login like qbiff etc,
> but more like notifiying users on another external email, SMS etc in the
> future. So a simple forward won't do, I need to call some external script
> each
Thus said Kimberly Vher on Fri, 10 Nov 2000 13:35:34:
> so that i have a copy in my hotmail account. but i want to make a copy to
> multiple address how can i do that?
Just put in multiple addresses in the .qmail file---they should each be
separated by a newline. That's all folks.
Andy
--
[-
Thus said defender of the protocol on Fri, 10 Nov 2000 21:24:59 EST:
> someone correct me if im wrong, but when i add a user (to users/assign, i
> have all virtualdomains), i run qmail-newu and SIGHUP qmail-send, so yeah
There is no need to HUP qmail-send unless virtualdomains or locals has
ch
Thus said [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 12 Nov 2000 11:54:48 CST:
> So you're basically saying that qmail can pretty much mung up an
> e-mail address any way it likes because it's...qmail!
No, he is not saying that at all. qmail out-of-the-box will not munge
anything. What that user was asking
Thus said "Michael T. Babcock" on Sat, 18 Nov 2000 13:41:20 EST:
> OSI == "Open Source Initiative" I believe ...
That's funny, I always thought that OSI was the _Open Systems
Interconnection_ internet model proposed by the ISO. I guess this
goes to show that context really does matter. :-)
A
Thus said "Casey Allen Shobe" on Sat, 18 Nov 2000 03:30:55 EST:
> Hi there, I run a webmail service, and am having some trouble. It appears
> that not all web browsers send CRLF, but instead send LF only when I
> compose (this is the fault of the widget used for entering email).
It has nothin
Thus said Raul Miller on Sun, 19 Nov 2000 12:33:30 EST:
> Or do you have similar problems deciding whether ATM means automated
> teller machine or asychronous transfer mode? Or deciding whether
> ASP means active server pages or application service provider? Or ...
Not generally, however, I mu
Thus said "David L. Nicol" on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 20:12:46 CST:
> What about the "notification on delivery" stuff -- is that not
> an MTA feature? Is it deprecated? Rather it would be a feature
> of the MDA, has anyone added it to qmail-local?
You mean something like what is covered in "man qrece
Thus said Jose AP Celestino on Wed, 22 Nov 2000 01:38:39 GMT:
> Have you tried rtfm. There's plenty of stuff on this.
Why don't you RTFM on your MUA so you don't send out duplicate emails
to the mailing list... sheesh.
Andy
--
[---[system uptime]--
Thus said David Ryan on Wed, 22 Nov 2000 16:13:43 +1100:
> The main difference is that I do not want them to be able to
> reply-to-all. I had used a mailing list but someone did a reply-to-all
> and caused all sorts of trouble.
Use ezmlm to setup a mailing list and then make the list moderated s
On Wed, 22 Nov 2000 08:21:10 EST, Warren Small wrote:
> I'm sure a lot of you will say that the problem is obviously a DNS lookup
> issue but I can lookup this server name successfully from the same server
> that is having problems talking to the qmail server. This problem is also
> not confined
Thus said Romeyn Prescott on Sat, 25 Nov 2000 11:52:05 EST:
> There may be others. I have no idea if this will work.
It may work for a few cases, but with today's mailiers, it most likely
will corrupt the message or not be seen at all. Consider the different
Content-Type made available in mo
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000 14:06:03 EST, Dave Sill wrote:
> I recommend copying and pasting the scripts, rather than typing them
> in by hand. Unless you're in Florida, in which case, entering manually
> is more accurate.
ROTFLOL!!! This has got to be one of the best Florida jokes I have
seen. :-)
A
Thus said Chris Olson on Tue, 28 Nov 2000 00:28:26 CST:
> I believe I'm no more braindead than you are. At least I have the
> common courtesy to not post a derogatory statement like this on the
> list, nor would I even send a private email to anyone containing a
Granted, it is pretty rude to se
Thus said "asantos" on Wed, 29 Nov 2000 22:13:18 -0100:
> For someone with such a doubtfull sense of humour as he shows to have
> welcoming IE users the way he does at http://socha.net/, he seems to be
> inordinately proud of listing among his "computer skills" Microsoft Office.
Bah! That's a l
Thus said Jamin Collins on Wed, 29 Nov 2000 12:45:04 CST:
> > * 6 attribution lines
>
> Don't believe this is a requirement or violation of any RFC. If it is,
> which one?
>
> > * No citation leader
>
> Once again. Don't believe this is a requirement or violation of any RFC. If
> it is, whi
Thus said Arif Rudiana on Thu, 30 Nov 2000 10:14:42 +0700:
> to find in archive files... I think it's better to post my questions to
> this millist
Please turn of HTML in your emails. ;-)
> in recipient the sender username appears like this
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wh
Thus said "montgomery f. tidwell" on Thu, 30 Nov 2000 18:59:32 PST:
> sorry for all the tests. this is the only mail list that
> will accept my Sender: messed up emails.
That's because qmail doesn't care about the Sender header...
Andy
--
[---[system uptime]
Thus said Andrew Buenaventura on Fri, 01 Dec 2000 11:56:36 +0800:
> I am going to setup a dedicated linux box that will run qmail only. What is
> the most minimum package that I need to install from Red Hat 7.0 to be able
> to run Qmail? I do not want unnecessary services/daemons running on that
1 - 100 of 184 matches
Mail list logo
