Re: delay before checking mail with outlook

2001-04-09 Thread Henning Brauer
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 11:17:04PM +, Ahmad Ridha wrote: > Since the problem occurs so often, why aren't the -R and -H options > made default? Perhpas it should also be included in LWQ. Is there any > real disadvantage of using those options? They don't cause trouble and are useful in proper

Re: delay before checking mail with outlook

2001-04-09 Thread Henning Brauer
On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 12:35:33AM +0200, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote: > weekly FAQ autoposts? > /k Ones not reading the answer half an hour ago don't read FAQs , too, wether porsted or not. -- Henning Brauer | BS Web Services Hostmaster BSWS| Roedingsmarkt 14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 H

Hoew to Queue only mail

2001-04-09 Thread Kashan Sadiq
If there are two servers running qmail on both of them. One is primary and the second is backup mail server which is for use of Queueing only. Now how would the mails on secondary mail server transfer to primary mail server and then stores in user accounts automatically. Thanks for ur help. Kash

test with postmaster failed

2001-04-09 Thread Franco Vecchiato
Hi, I'm trying to install qmail on a PC with a Suse Linux distribution (I installed sendmail but I never configured it), and there are problems with aliases (postmaster). I downloaded the tar.gz packages from www.flounder.net/qmail/qmail-howto.html (qmail, qmail patch, daemontools, dot-forward,

qmail Digest 9 Apr 2001 10:00:01 -0000 Issue 1329

2001-04-09 Thread qmail-digest-help
qmail Digest 9 Apr 2001 10:00:01 - Issue 1329 Topics (messages 60466 through 60492): Re: SMTP not working . 60466 by: i2linux.test.okmail.co.kr Re: From sendmail to qmail 60467 by: Frank Tegtmeyer 60468 by: Frank Tegtmeyer 60469 by: Boris 60470 b

PTHREAD_THREADS_MAX 1024 -> 8192

2001-04-09 Thread hantunes
will this increase qmail performance on linux server? ./hantunes

Re: PTHREAD_THREADS_MAX 1024 -> 8192

2001-04-09 Thread Henning Brauer
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 11:38:40AM +0100, hantunes wrote: > will this increase qmail performance > on linux server? No. -- Henning Brauer | BS Web Services Hostmaster BSWS| Roedingsmarkt 14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg http://www.bsws.de | Germany

Re: 4.4.2 error smtp info

2001-04-09 Thread Cybersync
To anyone that was interested the errors seem to be because the ISP doesnt know what the hell they are running. I asked them whether they were running a traffic shaper or a load balancing device and they said "Duh" then said "o no we dont have anything like that." I then used my personal dialup to

multilog: unable to lock directory

2001-04-09 Thread Michael T. Babcock
One of the 6 supervised services on one of my gateways stopped responding (tinydns) yesterday afternoon. On the screen was "unable to lock directory /var/log/tinydns:", so I did an "svc -t /service/tinydns/log" and it worked fine. Since the line that generates that log output exits 111, how w

Not delivering mails

2001-04-09 Thread Sumith
Hello One of the domains is not receiving mailsfollowing is the output of qmail-send log @40003ad1a39e21f9de4c delivery 69737: deferral: Failed_to_write_RP_&_DT_(#4.3.2)/Yikes!_Could_create_but_ca n't_delete_temporary_file!!/ENOENT:_path_doesn't_exist/ Can someone please guide me as

RE: I am back to square ONE...

2001-04-09 Thread Kirti S. Bajwa
Hi All: On 4-6-2001, I posted a message asking help in trying to find out why a connection to qmail was being refused. I included the following error message which was being displayed when error response was received: -

Kernel parameters

2001-04-09 Thread Federico Edelman Anaya
Hi! I'm running the Qmail-1.03(big-todo.patch and big-concurrency.path) + Ezmlm-0.53 on Linux Debian Kernel 2.2.17 I have a question! What kernel's parameters is most aproppiate for my kernel? I put in /etc/sysctl.conf fs.file-max=16384 fs.inode-max=65536 uname -n 8192 in /etc/init.d/qmaild

Re: PTHREAD_THREADS_MAX 1024 -> 8192

2001-04-09 Thread dan . kelley
no. qmail isin't multithreaded. dan On Mon, 09 Apr 2001, you wrote: > will this increase qmail performance > on linux server? > > ./hantunes

RE: test with postmaster failed

2001-04-09 Thread Willy De la Court
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, You forgot these # redirect postmaster and mailder-daemon mail to root echo root > /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-postmaster echo root > /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-mailer-daemon # after this you have 2 choices you can create a Maildir maildirmake /var/qma

Upps.. :) Kernel parameters

2001-04-09 Thread Federico Edelman Anaya
Hi! I'm running the Qmail-1.03(big-todo.patch and big-concurrency.path) + Ezmlm-0.53 on Linux Debian Kernel 2.2.17 I have a question! What kernel's parameters is most aproppiate for my kernel? I put in /etc/sysctl.conf fs.file-max=16384 fs.inode-max=65536 ulimit -n 8192 in /etc/init.d/qmaild

Re: test with postmaster failed

2001-04-09 Thread Gerrit Pape
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 07:49:02PM +0200, Willy De la Court wrote: > On Monday, April 09, 2001 11:11, Franco Vecchiato > [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > > > - cd ~alias > > - touch .qmail-postmaster > > - touch .qmail-mailer-daemon > > - touch .qmail-root > > - chmod 644 ~alias/.qmail* > > -

Re: delay before checking mail with outlook

2001-04-09 Thread Dave Sill
Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 11:17:04PM +, Ahmad Ridha wrote: >> Since the problem occurs so often, why aren't the -R and -H options >> made default? Perhpas it should also be included in LWQ. Is there any >> real disadvantage of using those options? > >

-help@

2001-04-09 Thread Marcus Ouimet

Dynamic email addresses

2001-04-09 Thread davidu
Hi, I have a the whole qmail+vpopmail+pop+imap+mysql+qmailadmin setup and it is all running great. One thing I would like to do however is allow users to append to their email address: for example, If my username, [EMAIL PROTECTED] was valid, I would like [EMAIL PROTECTED] to also work (or

RE: -help@

2001-04-09 Thread Bill Andersen
Just when you thought a message couldn't get any less specific... :) -Original Message- From: Marcus Ouimet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 3:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: -help@

Re: Hoew to Queue only mail

2001-04-09 Thread Tim Legant
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 02:33:45AM -0600, Kashan Sadiq wrote: > If there are two servers running qmail on both of them. One is > primary and the second is backup mail server which is for use of Queueing > only. Now how would the mails on secondary mail server transfer to primary > mail server and

qmail, qmail-command and procmail

2001-04-09 Thread Subba Rao
Hello, I have started qmail with the following option in /var/qmail/rc: exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH" \ qmail-start '|dot-forward .forward |preline procmail' splogger qmail Here I am explicitly using procmail as my MDA. My .qmail has one entry which is, "./Maildir/" Wh

Re: qmail, qmail-command and procmail

2001-04-09 Thread Ricardo Cerqueira
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 07:57:37PM +, Subba Rao wrote: > Hello, > > I have started qmail with the following option in /var/qmail/rc: > > exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH" \ > qmail-start '|dot-forward .forward |preline procmail' splogger qmail > > Here I am explicitly using

Removing inetd

2001-04-09 Thread Martin Marconcini
Hi, Sorry for the stupid question, but I have been searching the mailing list archives and there and hundreds of results and none seems to help. Perhaps because the keyword has been used too many times. What I'd like to do is to remove qmail from inetd. (I have already

Re[2]: Hoew to Queue only mail

2001-04-09 Thread Boris
Hello Tim, Tuesday, April 10, 2001, 12:16:31 AM, you wrote: TL> On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 02:33:45AM -0600, Kashan Sadiq wrote: >> If there are two servers running qmail on both of them. One is >> primary and the second is backup mail server which is for use of Queueing >> only. Now how would the

Re: A strange behavior.

2001-04-09 Thread Kou Sato
I am beginning to give up expecting to find the answer here, but anyway: I've confirmed that the problem occurs only if I try to send a message from the hosts in the same domain. (i.e., hosts in domain 'my.domain'.) Sending a message from other domain to [EMAIL PROTECTED] always succe

Re: Removing inetd

2001-04-09 Thread alexus
i put my stuff in rc.local get commands from FAQ on qmail.org site - Original Message - From: "Martin Marconcini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 9:39 PM Subject: Removing inetd > Hi, > > Sorry for the stupid question, but I have been searching

CNAME lookup failed

2001-04-09 Thread Thum Chee Weng, Ronnie
hi, Error is the qmail log is as follows -- CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily._(#4.4.3) --- What does this mean ??? Ronnie This email had been che

Re: CNAME lookup failed

2001-04-09 Thread Alex Pennace
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 11:01:55AM +0800, Thum Chee Weng, Ronnie wrote: > hi, > > Error is the qmail log is as follows > -- > CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily._(#4.4.3) > --- > > What does this mean ??? It means you haven't

RE: CNAME lookup failed

2001-04-09 Thread Thum Chee Weng, Ronnie
whose DNS is at fault ? Ronnie -Original Message- From: Alex Pennace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 11:13 AM To: Thum Chee Weng, Ronnie Cc: 'qmail list' Subject: Re: CNAME lookup failed On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 11:01:55AM +0800, Thum Chee Weng, Ronnie wrote: >

Re: Dynamic email addresses

2001-04-09 Thread Par Leijonhufvud
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010409 23:05]: > One thing I would like to do however is allow users to append to their > email address: > > for example, If my username, [EMAIL PROTECTED] was valid, I would > like [EMAIL PROTECTED] to also work (or > [EMAIL

Re: A strange behavior.

2001-04-09 Thread Tim Legant
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 11:02:32AM +0900, Kou Sato wrote: > >I am beginning to give up expecting to find the answer here, but anyway: As Dave requested before, please provide us the output of qmail-showctl. Don't hide your domain names.

Re: Hoew to Queue only mail

2001-04-09 Thread Tim Legant
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 03:38:09AM +0200, Boris wrote: > Tuesday, April 10, 2001, 12:16:31 AM, you wrote: > TL> On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 02:33:45AM -0600, Kashan Sadiq wrote: > >> If there are two servers running qmail on both of them. One is > >> primary and the second is backup mail server which

Re: Removing inetd

2001-04-09 Thread Tim Legant
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 10:39:54PM -0300, Martin Marconcini wrote: > Now I have installed ucspi-tcp. The question is> WHat is the command line I > should use? > > I have OpenBSD 2.8. And where's the best place to put it? (rc.local?) > > If i can read this in some sort of onli

RE: CNAME lookup failed

2001-04-09 Thread Thum Chee Weng, Ronnie
It's for all the domains i sent emails to including hotmail.com, yahoo.com, jaring.my and even my own domain, asiatravelmart.com Ronnie -Original Message- From: Magnus Bodin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 1:12 PM To: Thum Chee Weng, Ronnie Subject: Re: CNAME loo

Re: Removing inetd (now smtp/tcpserver prob)

2001-04-09 Thread Martin Marconcini
Thanks. I have it working. Now i have this (among with all qmail/supervise processes) process runing: /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -p -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c 20 -u 2850 -g 32750 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd According to life-w/qmail this is all correct (I have followed every step) Local