To all qmail members,
I am completely new to qmail. I developed one application related to mail
system. According to my requirement I want to collect all my mail messages
to one particular system account. I achieve same functionality with Sendmail
in Linux.
My system configuration is give below.
Hi,
I'm wondering what
is the correct use of this command (TAI64NLOCAL) inside the supervise
scripts.
I have three
run scripts in /var/qmail/supervise... and they look like:
exec setuidgid
qmaill multilog t s200 /var/log/qmail/qmail-pop3d
The other two are
similar.
I don't want the
qmail Digest 20 Dec 2000 11:00:01 - Issue 1219
Topics (messages 54196 through 54265):
Re: More on relay problem, something to do with tcpserver
54196 by: Andrew Richards
Re: 501 Badly structured mime attachment
54197 by: Alex Kramarov
How can I change return path "Return P
From were can i get... accustamp
Thankyou..
Seby...
Hi All !
I have problem with dilivering message from outern mail server to local
mail server
Outern (Sendmail), Local(QMail). While dilivering i have got hext
message
The original message was received at Wed, 20 Dec 2000 13:34:58 +0200
from t-rex.net.consul [192.168.1.204]
- The followin
I am running Open BSD 2.8 and Qmail. I am calling SMTP and POP using
TCPServer with the ff script:
if [ -x /usr/local/bin/tcpserver ]; then
echo -n ' Qmail-SMTP'; /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -v -u
7791
-g 2108 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd \
2>&1 | /var/qmail/bin/splogger
To all qmail members,
I am completely new to qmail. I developed one application related to mail
system. According to my requirement I want to collect all my mail messages
to one particular system account. I achieve same functionality with Sendmail
in Linux.
My system configuration is give below.
I believe you are seeking the queue_extra settings in extra.h in
the qmail source. You need to download the source package
and read some documentation on what modifications you make
to the source. Good luck!
Nathan Harmon
- Original Message -
From: "Bhavesh Vakil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
T
Here's
the command we use:
/usr/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
2>&1 | multilog t s2 n50 \ !'tai64nlocal | gzip'
/usr/qmail/log/SMTP/ &
Unfortunately, multilog doesn't honor "s" parameter
arguments that big. Anyway, when rotating the log, multilog pipes it through
tai64nlocal to store
Seby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From were can i get... accustamp
accustamp is a part of older version of Dan Bernstein's daemontools package.
The functionality of accustamp has been put into multilog, which replaces
cyclog.
If you need accustamp, you'll have to go back to daemontools
Bhavesh Vakil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When [EMAIL PROTECTED] receives mail in his mail box automatically that
> mail is also available in [EMAIL PROTECTED] (it means direct copy). Same
> way if any user like (user_b, user_c,.) receives any mail then all mail
> is also available in my a
Bhavesh Vakil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To all qmail members,
Don't post the same message to the mailing list twice, just becuase you haven't
received an answer yet. It's rude. Besides, there have been at least two
followups on the mailing list which answered your questions.
Charles
--
---
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Seby wrote:
> From were can i get... accustamp
>
> Thankyou..
Charles has already said you can get it from daemontools-0.53 (or
less). However, I've got one in perl if you'd like. It works under
Solaris and Linux.
You'll need to have run h2ph on the /usr/incl
Hi,
I am trying to get a better understanding of the interoperation and I have tried
the archives but can't find the answer I am looking for.
I have qmail working by using Sill's LWQ, but I don't understand how the programs
qmail-send and qmail-smtp are linked to the multilog program. I see that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 20 December 2000 at 16:29:07
GMT
> I have qmail working by using Sill's LWQ, but I don't understand
> how the programs qmail-send and qmail-smtp are linked to the
> multilog program. I see that they are both started independently
> and that mu
richard morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Has anyone tried to use the ETRN command from behind a router using NAT. Our
> problem is we can send out the ETRN command to port 25 on the ISP's box but
> they cannot come in?
Does your router know which server to forward the incoming connection
to?
Our use of MAPS-RBL filtering on our Qmail servers has been in
place for over a year with very few complaints about inaccessibility.
Lately a couple of intended correspondents have been ruled out by
the system.
Very definitely the "filtered outs" ought to take steps to get off the
RBL lists f
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:36:05PM -0500, Jerry Keene wrote:
> Our use of MAPS-RBL filtering on our Qmail servers has been in
> place for over a year with very few complaints about inaccessibility.
>
> Lately a couple of intended correspondents have been ruled out by
> the system.
>
> Very def
Hi folks,
This may or may not belong here, but hopefully someone's done this before.
Is there something out there to provide secure web access to mailboxes,
which works well with Qmail ?
Any pointers will be appreciated.
Jean
Thus spake Einar Bordewich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> We have been using qmail-scanner several months now, I can highly recomend
> this solution. We are splitting the load on two dual PIII 700 proc. servers
> with 512MB each.
Virus scanners don't solve the problem.
http://www.fefe.de/antivirus/42.zi
Lots of em, try looking on freshmeat.net.
sqwebmail and the IMP are most common I would think.
-Original Message-
From: Jean Caron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 1:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Qmail & Web
Hi folks,
This may or may not belong here
Hello, I installed svscan, as instructed for best performance with qmail,
and then i started qmail using csh because svscan did not start it in
enough time. now i have this message in my /var/log/messages file:
Dec 2 .. init: Id "SV" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes
dont know how to
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 11:42:57AM -0800, Thomas Holton wrote:
>
> Hello, I installed svscan, as instructed for best performance with qmail,
Well, svscan doesn't affect the performance of qmail - it affects the
manageability and reliability of starting qmail.
> and then i started qmail using cs
Thomas,
I'm finding theexact same problem here. I guess you are installing from
Bruce's RPM packages ... well it seems that there is some kind of
version mismatch between the packages.
I couldn't solve it yet. I'd say you should check which are the
recommended verisons of the da
Thanks for your prompt reply.
The commands i put into the inittab file are the ones given in the
documentation:
SV:123456:respawn:env - PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin
svscan /service /dev/console 2>/dev/console
since svscan is located /usr/local/bin, it is clearly in the path.
Besi
Actually mine is an install from the source which i have done. so i bet
our problem is not the same then huh?
unfortunately i downloaded the most recent version, so i wonder how i
should go about this now?
still no clue here so i suppose i should go back and try installing again.
-tom
On Wed,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I am trying to get a better understanding of the interoperation and I
>have tried the archives but can't find the answer I am looking for.
>
>I have qmail working by using Sill's LWQ, but I don't understand how
>the programs qmail-send and qmail-smtp are linked to the mu
hi i seem to be having a problem with local deliveries. after a reboot 3-4
local deliveries will be completed. then everything just seems to queue? i
have checked the log files and i'm not quite sure what it is i'm looking for
[newborn to linux / unix / qmail world]. there is an entry about spawn
Jean Caron wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> This may or may not belong here, but hopefully someone's done this before.
>
> Is there something out there to provide secure web access to mailboxes,
> which works well with Qmail ?
>
> Any pointers will be appreciated.
> Jean
We use Squirrel Mail (http://
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:50:05PM -0800, Thomas Holton wrote:
>
> Thanks for your prompt reply.
> The commands i put into the inittab file are the ones given in the
> documentation:
>
> SV:123456:respawn:env - PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin
> svscan /service /dev/console 2>/dev/con
richard morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi i seem to be having a problem with local deliveries. after a reboot 3-4
> local deliveries will be completed. then everything just seems to queue? i
> have checked the log files and i'm not quite sure what it is i'm looking for
> [newborn to linux / u
Thomas,
I am guessing it's an issue with supervise scripts. Thy've gone from
2.x to 3.x and there things stopped working for me. The problem is that
I haven't been able to replace 3.1 with 2.4 in a clean way.
martin
Thomas Holton wrote:
> still no clue here so i suppose i sho
I don't have problem with sendmail. i've just upgrade to qmail few days ago
and got this strange problem. some of the remote side randomly gives error
500! especially to aol and psi.net. any ideas?
(my system is running bruceg's qmail 1.03+patch rpm on RH6.2)
> Dec 18 17:45:23 localhost qmail
Thanks again:
> > SV:123456:respawn:env - PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin
> > svscan /service /dev/console 2>/dev/console
>
> All on one line?
no, makes up two lines
> Are there any messages on /dev/console?
no, there is nothing in /dev/console/
>
> What happens if you start up svs
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 06:32:46PM -0300, martin langhoff wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> I am guessing it's an issue with supervise scripts. Thy've gone from
> 2.x to 3.x and there things stopped working for me. The problem is that
> I haven't been able to replace 3.1 with 2.4 in a clean way.
I don
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 01:39:54PM -0800, Thomas Holton wrote:
> many messages:
> supervise: fatal: unable to start qmail-smtpd/run: access denied
> supervise: fatal: unable to start qmail-send/run: file does not exist
> supervise: fatal: unable to start log/run: access denied
Are these log entri
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 01:39:54PM -0800, Thomas Holton wrote:
>
> Thanks again:
>
> > > SV:123456:respawn:env - PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin
> > > svscan /service /dev/console 2>/dev/console
> >
> > All on one line?
> no, makes up two lines
Right. It needs to be one line.
> > A
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 05:28:52PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'm having one heck of a time getting qmail-smtpd to allow mu users to
> send mail.
>
> my /etc/tcp.smtp file looks as such.
>
> 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> 216.177.2.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> :allow
>
> then after s
Hmm... check user and exec permissions on the file 'qmail-smtpd-wrapper'?
That's all I can think of. Then maybe try another script that doesn't do
much -- etc...
Later,
Ben.
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 06:07:16PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> diggin thru my logs i find this in /var/log/qmail/s
Thanks Jon.
Jerry R. Keene
Senior Systems Analyst
SCS ENGINEERS---1970-2000! Thirty Year Anniversary
Partners With EPA Through The Landfill Methane Outreach Program
Phone: 703.471.6150
Fax: 703.471.6676
http://www.scsengineers.com
Felix von Leitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 20 December 2000 at 19:54:33 +0100
> Thus spake Einar Bordewich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > We have been using qmail-scanner several months now, I can highly recomend
> > this solution. We are splitting the load on two dual PIII 700 proc. servers
>
Yes they do. But they can also be misused, by for instance the zip file you
provided the link for. My servers did'nt take harm of this file, but I'm
sure that if I did'nt have the free disk space I have on my servers, they
would.
I'm not sure what qmail-scanner does if the process running out of
diggin thru my logs i find this in /var/log/qmail/smtpd
977352942.017873 tcpserver: ok 4501 usa.usaexpress.net:206.183.143.244:25
zmamail02.zma.compaq.com:161.114.64.102::2564
977352942.017928 tcpserver: warning: dropping connection, unable to run
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd-wrapper: exec format e
I'm having one heck of a time getting qmail-smtpd to allow mu users to
send mail.
my /etc/tcp.smtp file looks as such.
127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
216.177.2.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
:allow
then after saving that i run
tcprules tcp.smtp.cdb tcp.smtp.temp < tcp.smtp
and that goes through
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 06:07:16PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> diggin thru my logs i find this in /var/log/qmail/smtpd
>
> 977352942.017873 tcpserver: ok 4501 usa.usaexpress.net:206.183.143.244:25
> zmamail02.zma.compaq.com:161.114.64.102::2564
> 977352942.017928 tcpserver: warning: droppin
Hi guys,
As far as I know, DJB's license allow to build source rpm and distribute it.
The patches are applied at build time and no binaries is distributed.
Does someone can tell me if is it ok?
[]s
Davi
[root@sphinx qmail]# /etc/rc.d/init.d/qmail start
Starting qmail: svscan.
[root@sphinx qmail]# multilog: fatal: unable to switch to current
directory: access denied
I've followed Dave Sill's qmail installation manual.
So, do u use the external viru scan software?
or only the qmail-scan defaut?
Which external viru scanner r u using?
how big is the difference both on speed and secutiy?
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000 00:34:35 +0100
"Einar Bordewich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have been using qmail-scanner several
Hi guys and gals,
I can't compile qmail-scanner on solaris 8.
uudecode fails with an option error
__
bash-2.03# CC=gcc ./configure --admin postmaster --domain
trevda.com --archive /var/s
ok well with the qmail-smtp problems outta the way
i am confused about relaying rules
this is my /etc/tcp.smtp file
127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
g4.net:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
however this does not work...when i send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] i get
this message
Can't send to ". The ser
It should be an IP address.
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Kurth Bemis wrote:
> ok well with the qmail-smtp problems outta the way
>
> i am confused about relaying rules
>
> this is my /etc/tcp.smtp file
>
> 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> g4.net:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
>
> however this does not
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 10:03:33PM -0200, Davi wrote:
>As far as I know, DJB's license allow to build source rpm and distribute it.
>The patches are applied at build time and no binaries is distributed.
>Does someone can tell me if is it ok?
It seems to be. I mean, there's a link for SRPMs for Q
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 09:45:41AM +0800, Paul Tan wrote:
> Hi guys and gals,
>
> I can't compile qmail-scanner on solaris 8.
> uudecode fails with an option error
> broken uudecoder on your system - cannot use uudecode component
>
> Error msg: test-uudecode.tst: No su
rpm -e ucspi-unix-0.34-1
error: removing these packages would break dependencies:
ucspi-unix is needed by qmail-1.03+patches-16
[root@test bruceg]# rpm -e qmail-1.03+patches-16
error: removing these packages would break dependencies:
qmail >= 1.03+patches is needed by relay-ct
> Is this a cut-n-paste or did you type it into your mail message by hand?
> If this is really what the script looks like, try adding a "!" after the
> "#", as indicated.
>
> > usa:/var/qmail/bin# cat qmail-smtpd-wrapper
> > #/bin/bash
>^- add ! here, so it looks like this:
> #!/bin/ba
Hi...
How to configure mailder-daemon to reply back to the sender (with error
message "No such user" or anything...) if the user don't have Maildir in
their home directory? (Some of the users does not allowed to have email).
TQ in advance.
I hope this is not considered as spamming...
Luke
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 01:58:29PM -0500, Tim Hunter wrote:
> Lots of em, try looking on freshmeat.net.
>
> sqwebmail and the IMP are most common I would think.
I like TWIG very much. See http://www.screwdriver.net/twig
Regards,
Siaco.
--
Ryszard Łach, Internet Designers s.c., Przedmiejska 6
58 matches
Mail list logo
