Re: Return receipt [T2000103100V0]

2000-11-03 Thread OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg
> I know it. But my question it's another. I'm going try explain better. > > I have try these. > > I have send a email with netscape comunnicator 4.61 and i have put > "Request return receipt" to on. I have send these email over a SMTP > SENDMAIL server, and when i received this email, i have been

assign file automatically replaced... Why??

2000-11-03 Thread David
Hi there, I've just installed qmail, spent some time to configure it and finally tested it. It worked fine until I noticed something that's driving me crazy: I've built a /etc/qmail/users/assign file where I put all the popusers of the system, executed qmail-newu and restarted qmail. It worked. A

Re: TCPSERVER: Unable to Bind to Port

2000-11-03 Thread Schwarz Hans-Juergen
Hallo Anthony, Friday, November 03, 2000, 6:24:07 AM, you wrote: > then I ran "tcprules tcp.smtp.cdb tcp.smtp.temp < tcp.smtp" without any > problem... then ran "tcpserver -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u501 -g501 0 smtp > /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd &" and ran into my first problem. Like others, I > got

Re: Yahoo delivery failure - short test and proposal

2000-11-03 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 11:28:53PM +1100, Brett Randall wrote: > On Thu, 02 Nov 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Count me in. I'm seeing the same problem. > > Well, I'm not really after an army of followers, but I would more like > to see people taking some degree of initiative, giving the

Re: high performance configs [was: Blocked pipe to qmail-queue]

2000-11-03 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 04:52:50PM -0700, Sean Reifschneider wrote: [snip] > The first thing to do about this if you want to implement it is to > find out exactly WHY apache chose to do it that way. What were they > hoping to resolve with that, and did it actually achieve the desired > results?

qmail Digest 3 Nov 2000 11:00:01 -0000 Issue 1173

2000-11-03 Thread qmail-digest-help
qmail Digest 3 Nov 2000 11:00:01 - Issue 1173 Topics (messages 51494 through 51597): Re: Prolem (carefully) explained 51494 by: Cyril Bitterich 51495 by: Brett Randall 51499 by: Howard Miller 51501 by: Brett Randall 51502 by: Howard Miller 515

Re: RCPTHOSTS Dilemma

2000-11-03 Thread Justin Bell
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 04:37:43PM -0500, Anthony Abby wrote: # I'm having a problem with RCPTHOSTS and relaying. Without RCPTHOSTS (or # MORERCPTHOSTS) my mail server is an open relay, and yet I'm having # difficulty setting it up so that my Listserv (Listar), which runs on the # same box as QMa

FW: TCPSERVER: Unable to Bind to Port

2000-11-03 Thread Anthony Abby
Played with TCPSERVER a little more this morning and I'm still unable to connect to port 25 (telnet listserv.genexchange.com 25) but if I run 'ps ax' I don't see anything running that would be using port 25 either. I have already removed SMTP from xinetd.d so I know xinetd isn't trying to bind po

FW: TCPSERVER: Unable to Bind to Port

2000-11-03 Thread Anthony Abby
Dropping smtp back into /etc/xinetd.d/ allows me to connect to port 25 again so I know I think that pretty conclusively indicates I did not "install" tcpservers correctly. Anthony

Re: (Fwd) ezmlm response

2000-11-03 Thread Albert Hopkins
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 08:14:10PM -0500, Alex Pennace wrote: [...] > alex@buick:~$ telnet mail01.sherwin.com smtp > Trying 148.141.15.156... > Connected to mail01.sherwin.com. > Escape character is '^]'. > 220 >0**2*20

RE: (Fwd) ezmlm response

2000-11-03 Thread Greg Owen
> > 220 > 0* > *2*2000 **02**0*00 > > EHLO buick.978.org > > 500 Syntax error, command " buick.978.org" unrecognized > > QUIT > > 221 ehub1.sherwin.com SMTP Service closing transmission channel > > > This looks l

Error 451

2000-11-03 Thread Tom Laudeman
Is there a way to prevent qmail smtp from sending error 451? Rumor has it that there was a qmail bug where extra newlines in the email message generated a 451 response. We think we are running the latest stable version under Linux. Thanks! Tom. -- 804.951.3844 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://calendar.

Re: QMail and Win NT user auth

2000-11-03 Thread Kris Kelley
> Is there any way that I can use the same NT Domain Logon based system (the file) > to auth my further QMail users when checking their mail. The trick is to use NIS. This enables a centralized server to control all your user authentication information, instead of having each computer have /etc

Re: More trouble

2000-11-03 Thread Howard Miller
Well, we all had to start somewhere didn't we? Did you know everything about MTAs the first time you installed one? I am almost completely new to Unix systems but have had many years experience on various other platforms. I am the first to admit that I am used to commercial, expensively docum

Re: Error 451

2000-11-03 Thread Charles Cazabon
Tom Laudeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a way to prevent qmail smtp from sending error 451? Why would you want to? qmail only sends this when it detects an error. > Rumor has it that there was a qmail bug where extra newlines in the email > message generated a 451 response. Rumor is

Re: More trouble

2000-11-03 Thread Adam McKenna
On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 04:16:55PM -0800, Howard Miller wrote: > Well, we all had to start somewhere didn't we? Did you know everything > about MTAs the first time you installed one? I am almost completely new to > Unix systems but have had many years experience on various other platforms. > I

Re: Error 451

2000-11-03 Thread Michael Stevens
On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 11:18:36AM -0500, Tom Laudeman wrote: > Is there a way to prevent qmail smtp from sending error 451? Rumor has > it that there was a qmail bug where extra newlines in the email message > generated a 451 response. You run your systems based on rumours you hear? Doesn't soun

qmail and pine - I don't get it

2000-11-03 Thread Robin S. Socha
I maybe entirely dense, but I don't get how the Maildir patches for pine are supposed to work. I've successfully patched and built pine-4.30 on FreeBSD-3.4-RELEASE, but I'm stymied: how do I get the equivalent of mutt -f ~Maildir? Thanks a lot in advance, Robin -- Robin S. Socha (RSS110-RIPE) htt

Re: More trouble

2000-11-03 Thread David Dyer-Bennet
Howard Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 3 November 2000 at 16:16:55 -0800 > Well, we all had to start somewhere didn't we? Did you know everything > about MTAs the first time you installed one? I am almost completely new to > Unix systems but have had many years experience on various ot

RE: Error 451

2000-11-03 Thread Hubbard, David
Why would you not want to send a 451? Here's two reasons: 1) Why send a 451 back to a broken MTA who's sending you emails with bare newlines? It's very unlikely that someone is going to fix their MTA while the email destined to you is still in the queue so it would get fixed before the final re

Re: Error 451

2000-11-03 Thread Jerry Lynde
You don't mean the Fahrenheit error, do you? That one means that your qmail-send has processed one too many flames. ;o) At 09:20 AM 11/3/2000, Charles Cazabon wrote: >Tom Laudeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there a way to prevent qmail smtp from sending error 451? > >Why would you want t

Fwd: Re: More trouble

2000-11-03 Thread Howard Miller
>Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 16:59:04 -0800 >To: Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >From: Howard Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: More trouble >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Yes, well it's remarkably easy to talk big when you on the other side of >the Atlantic isn't it? I haven't

Re: qmail and pine - I don't get it

2000-11-03 Thread Robin S. Socha
* Robin S. Socha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001103 12:08]: > I may be entirely dense s/may be/am/g Damn, I suck... Sorry for the interruption. Now on with the show.

Re: Fwd: Re: More trouble

2000-11-03 Thread Aaron L. Meehan
Quoting Howard Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > >Oh and I posted this to the mailing list as well. I am sure everybody > >will be interested! in your behaviour!! Excuse me, Howie, but STOP posting private messages to the list just to spite people. We have some real work to do here. Goodness.

Re: Fwd: Re: More trouble

2000-11-03 Thread Adam McKenna
On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 05:05:11PM -0800, Howard Miller wrote: > >Yes, well it's remarkably easy to talk big when you on the other side of > >the Atlantic isn't it? I haven't at any stage been rude to anybody. You've been rude to everyone on the list. The fact that you didn't think you were bei

Re: Fwd: Re: More trouble

2000-11-03 Thread Jerry Lynde
At 11:10 AM 11/3/2000, Aaron L. Meehan wrote: >Quoting Howard Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > >Oh and I posted this to the mailing list as well. I am sure everybody > > >will be interested! in your behaviour!! > >Excuse me, Howie, but STOP posting private messages to the list >just to spite pe

Re: QMail and Win NT user auth

2000-11-03 Thread Henry Baragar
You might find something in SAMBA (www.samba.org). Henry > Hello to everyone, My company has the mail server running on Exchange > 5.0 (needles to say it works like hell) and I would like to move all > the accounts on Linux QMail:PROBLEM: Is it possible to authentificate > the QMail users agains

Force Queue run

2000-11-03 Thread Warren Small
I was wondering if there was a way to force a queue run with qmail. For sendmail we would do: sendmail -q0 -v The -v is optional, of course. Since qmail handles the queue and retries differently I suspect that trying to do this is irrelevant. I am experimenting with qmail for the first time and

RE: Force Queue run

2000-11-03 Thread Greg Owen
> I was wondering if there was a way to force a queue run with > qmail. Find the qmail-send process and send it a kill -ALRM. See the FAQ entry at: http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/admin.html#queuerun -- gowen -- Greg Owen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Force Queue run

2000-11-03 Thread James Browning
Send qmail-send an ALRM signal. Better yet, if you configure qmail to use daemontools you can use the system V style script Dave Sill provides in his "Life with Qmail" page. IMHO you should read his page from start to finish before you even begin to install qmail. It's a must read. regards, -

Re: ANNOUNCE: qrblcheck -- rbl checking for .qmail

2000-11-03 Thread Robert J Adams
Jon, Does this work for you? I was trying to get it up and running, didn't work, so I added a few debugging printf's and noticed that it looks up Domain: 0.0.2.151.relays.orbs.org For each message no matter what's in the "Received" line.. I also wanted to say thanks for starting the developmen

Re: Fwd: Re: More trouble

2000-11-03 Thread Howard Miller
Aaron, I am very sorry it won't happen again. I was really quite upset by Mr. McKenna's attitude. I questioned as aspect of his HOWTO and he became very personal and insulting. I have had a great deal of help from this list and wouldn't have got my system running without it. His attitude was quit

Connection closed by foreign host

2000-11-03 Thread Javier Morquecho Morquecho
Hi... I just installed QMail, I follow all indications of "Life with qmail", but I have a trouble when % telnet 127.0.0.1 110 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to 127.0.0.1. Escape character is '^]'. Connection closed by foreign host. Searching on http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mai

Re: ANNOUNCE: qrblcheck -- rbl checking for .qmail

2000-11-03 Thread Jon Rust
On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 02:48:22PM -0500, Robert J Adams wrote: > Jon, > > Does this work for you? I was trying to get it up and running, didn't work, > so I added a few debugging printf's and noticed that it looks up > > Domain: 0.0.2.151.relays.orbs.org > > For each message no matter what's i

RE: Connection closed by foreign host

2000-11-03 Thread Greg Owen
> % telnet 127.0.0.1 110 > Trying 127.0.0.1... > Connected to 127.0.0.1. > Escape character is '^]'. > Connection closed by foreign host. ... > Any ideaI have looking for 3 days ago Use 'lsof' to verify that the program you think is listening to those ports, is the program listeni

Re: Connection closed by foreign host

2000-11-03 Thread Gerry Boudreaux
Did you read the excellent FAQ that Dan bundles with the qmail distribution? Section 5. Setting up servers covers this pretty well. Hope this helps. Gerry At 04:52 PM 11/3/2000 -0600, Javier Morquecho Morquecho wrote: >Hi... > > I just installed QMail, I follow all indications of "Life

Re: ANNOUNCE: qrblcheck -- rbl checking for .qmail

2000-11-03 Thread Jon Rust
Robert, I have reproduced your problem... err my problem. I'm looking into it now. jon

configuring backmailservers

2000-11-03 Thread Jens Georg
hi, i am running a webserver with fine working qmail on it. a friend of mine has an own server, too. now, we would like to configure the follwing. his qmail-server should act as backup-mailserver for my system and my qmail-server should be his back-mailserver. the question now is, if it is enou

Qmail Configuration

2000-11-03 Thread Manu K.U.
Dear Sir,    Can you send me the qmail configuration details, with integrating qmail with virtual domains.   regards,   Manu

Re: ANNOUNCE: qrblcheck -- rbl checking for .qmail

2000-11-03 Thread Jon Rust
All fixed. Please try it out now and tell me what you think. Jon

Quota on outgoing mail

2000-11-03 Thread Eduardo Augusto Alvarenga
Hi, Is there any way to limit the size (quota) of outgoing SMTP data in qmail ? I'd like to limit a qmail-send outgoing size to 10MB. My users are making constant overloads on my bandwidth... Tks. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Eduardo Augusto Alvaren