On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 09:11:49PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Are you saying that qmail-rspawn regrows to 30M (or thereabouts) fairly immediately?
> Or are you making a general observation that "things seem slow"? In the latter case
> you'll want to resort to the usual strategies of lookin
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 04:37:41PM -0600, Erich Zigler wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 01:47:27PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Which OS Erich? I've seen this once before - but it'll take my braincells a
> > little while to recall which OS. The server I saw it on wasn't doing anything
>
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 01:47:27PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Which OS Erich? I've seen this once before - but it'll take my braincells a
> little while to recall which OS. The server I saw it on wasn't doing anything
> particularly different.
FreeBSD 3.3. I'm really confused. Everything
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 02:10:33PM -0600, Erich Zigler wrote:
> I had been getting complaints lately that mail was being delivered slower
> then usual through one of my servers. This server houses several semi-high
> traffic domains and a fairly large traffic mailing list. I logged into the
> serv
I had been getting complaints lately that mail was being delivered slower
then usual through one of my servers. This server houses several semi-high
traffic domains and a fairly large traffic mailing list. I logged into the
server and the queue wasn't that bad. 150 messages or so. But when I looke
