Re: Why is there no ucspi-tcp mailing list

c questions about using tcprules in conjunction with qmail/tcpserver? > I really want to use rblsmtp but there are two problems I've never used rblsmtp, so I can't offer any quick suggestions. :/ > I still don`t really understand why there is no mention of ucspi-tcp > either on

Re: Why is there no ucspi-tcp mailing list

> > > > I left out 'mailing list'. Obviously there are mentions of > ucspi-tcp. > > Well, there's no compulsion of the author to do so, now is there? > > When I've had a question about any of the ucspi-tcp tools, a Google > search pre

Re: Why is there no ucspi-tcp mailing list

On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 09:25:12AM -0400, martin wrote: > Replying to myself...sigh. > > I left out 'mailing list'. Obviously there are mentions of ucspi-tcp. Well, there's no compulsion of the author to do so, now is there? When I've had a question about

How to remove from the list?

Re: Why is there no ucspi-tcp mailing list

Replying to myself...sigh. I left out 'mailing list'. Obviously there are mentions of ucspi-tcp. At 09:02 AM 8/7/2001 -0400, you wrote: Hello. I have noted again that there is no ucspi-tcp mailing list. I have also searched the qmail mailing list for a previous mention of

Why is there no ucspi-tcp mailing list

Hello. I have noted again that there is no ucspi-tcp mailing list. I have also searched the qmail mailing list for a previous mention of ucspi-tcp to no avail. Further, whereas http://cr.yp.to/lists.html has a mention for qmailanalog, dot-forward & fastforward under the qmail mai

remove from list

ill only remove messages if you use "--remove", otherwise it will > only list the messages found. I would like to receive comments and > suggestions if possible. > > It's available at http://planeta.terra.com.br/arte/pantarotto/qremove/ > > [root@otonogatobasso /ro

Re: How-best-to: Secondary Queue for Mailing List

On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 05:56:46PM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote: > On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 11:45:00AM -0400, Jeff Hill wrote: > > When we e-mail a newsletter to our user list (10,000+ e-mail, twice a > > month), it holds up any other e-mail going into the send queue. What's

Re: How-best-to: Secondary Queue for Mailing List

On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 11:45:00AM -0400, Jeff Hill wrote: > When we e-mail a newsletter to our user list (10,000+ e-mail, twice a > month), it holds up any other e-mail going into the send queue. What's > the best way to avoid this? This question has been asked and answered less t

How-best-to: Secondary Queue for Mailing List

When we e-mail a newsletter to our user list (10,000+ e-mail, twice a month), it holds up any other e-mail going into the send queue. What's the best way to avoid this? The mail to the user list is not time-sensitive; it could take a day to trickle out and it wouldn't matter. But the

Re: [Fwd: queue 'blocked' by large recipient list]

On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 02:52:01PM +0200, Christian Rotter wrote: > Hi Peter, > > yep, this works > > reconfigured conf-qmail for a new QMAILHOME and reinstalled the > package, added the second rc script to the qmail script in init.d > and got it running > > such a shame - missed that KISS appr

Re: queue 'blocked' by large recipient list

On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 01:07:58PM +0200, Christian Rotter wrote: [snip] > is there any way to 'split' the remote queue between different > applications (or users) sending mail to get rid of this problem ? > or are there any other solutions for this ? Run 2 qmail instances on your server - one f

queue 'blocked' by large recipient list

Hello everybody, the ORNL search engine is down, and I've run into a little problem, so please excuse me if the subject has already been discussed when sending a newsletter to ~450K recipients, the queue fills up, the server spawns qmail-remote processes and starts delivering the newsletter (th

Re: qmail mailing list -- Suggestions

On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 08:53:15PM -0400, Jeff Palmer wrote: > Maybe we should make this list moderated? I for one would volunteer to > help moderate the list. > > Second idea Maybe the list maintainer should implement qmail-scanner or > some other virus scanner in the

qmail mailing list -- Suggestions

Maybe we should make this list moderated? I for one would volunteer to help moderate the list. Second idea Maybe the list maintainer should implement qmail-scanner or some other virus scanner in the list, so that infected mails couldn't get into the list, eliminating a million &

Re: domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts

On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 02:11:43PM +1000, Christian wrote: > But all I did is delete tcp.smp and rewrite it exactly the same! > the only difference that there could have been is a space .. If you rewrote it and left out a space, it can't possibly be "exactly the same", can it? That's sloppy thin

Re: domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts

ot;... domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts" > If I add a domain to rcpthosts a can send mail to it fine. > > I can also send message via telneting in or by using qmail-inject > so it's only a prob when sending from a client > > I have the mail domain name

Re: domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts

On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 10:55:40AM +1000, Christian wrote: > Hi, > I am now faced with the follwing error when sending to outside addresses > "... domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts" > If I add a domain to rcpthosts a can send mail to it fine. > > I ca

Re: domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts

tian wrote: > > Hi, > I am now faced with the follwing error when sending to outside addresses > "... domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts" > If I add a domain to rcpthosts a can send mail to it fine. > > I can also send message via telneting in or by using q

domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts

Hi, I am now faced with the follwing error when sending to outside addresses "... domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts" If I add a domain to rcpthosts a can send mail to it fine. I can also send message via telneting in or by using qmail-inject so it's only a prob

Re: How can we Inplement the mailing list in qmail

On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 09:52:03AM +0530, Sandeep Goel wrote: > > How can we implement mailing list in qmail-ldap a) read http://www.lifewithqmail.org/ldap/, there's a whole section about that b) use the correct list, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTE

How can we Inplement the mailing list in qmail

How can we implement mailing list in qmail-ldap

Re: Unsubscribe from qmail list

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > You Wrote: > > >I am helpless !!! > > Send an email to , just as > it stated in the informational message you received when you subscribed... > In case there is a problem figuring out exactly which address is subscribed, look at the headers for

Unsubscribe from qmail list

You Wrote: >I am helpless !!! Send an email to , just as it stated in the informational message you received when you subscribed... -- Roger Walker Tier III Messaging/News Team Internet Applications, National Consumer IP TELUS Corporation 780-493-2471

Re: OT: RBL false positives (Follow-up from: Spam IP master list?)

On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 02:09:31PM -0400, Roger Merchberger wrote: [...] > My main concern is rejecting "real" email using RBL... I recall hearing > folks having problems with that in the past. Has RBL improved on the false > positives problem? There is no such thing as an RBL false positive; a

Re: OT: RBL false positives (Follow-up from: Spam IP master list?)

BL is for more serious offenders, so to speak. > If you want a better chance of not blocking mail you care about, > perhaps start with the DUL (dialup list). It only lists the IP > addresses which ISPs have voluntarily submitted as belonging to dialup > lines, and which therefor

Re: OT: RBL false positives (Follow-up from: Spam IP master list?)

setup... It shouldn't. Dan has complete instructions on what to look for when upgrading from previous versions at http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/upgrade.html . You may want to install a patch to rblsmtpd at the same time which allows it to work with A records instead of the TXT records, as some of th

OT: RBL false positives (Follow-up from: Spam IP master list?)

Rumor has it that Johan Almqvist may have mentioned these words: [snip] >http://libertas.wirehub.net/spamlist.txt >http://www.almqvist.net/johan/orbs/ Thanks for the pointers! >> > I really don't want to patch & reinstall qmail with the RBL... (and it >> > seems ORBS went away...) Besides, I'm

Re: Spam IP master list?

Roger Merchberger writes: > Kindof an offtopic question, but is there a "Master List" of IP's that send > spam regularly, with which I could use to update my tcprules deny list? > > I really don't want to patch & reinstall qmail with the RBL... (and it

Re: Spam IP master list?

* Peter van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010620 18:34]: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 12:15:04PM -0400, Roger Merchberger wrote: > > Kindof an offtopic question, but is there a "Master List" of IP's that send > > spam regularly, with which I could use to update

RE: Spam IP master list?

AIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 12:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Spam IP master list? Kindof an offtopic question, but is there a "Master List" of IP's that send spam regularly, with which I could use to update my tcprules deny list? I really don't want

Re: Spam IP master list?

Roger Merchberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kindof an offtopic question, but is there a "Master List" of IP's that send > spam regularly, with which I could use to update my tcprules deny list? > > I really don't want to patch & reinstall qmail with

Re: Spam IP master list?

On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 12:15:04PM -0400, Roger Merchberger wrote: > Kindof an offtopic question, but is there a "Master List" of IP's that send > spam regularly, with which I could use to update my tcprules deny list? > > I really don't want to patch & rei

Re: Spam IP master list?

On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 12:15:04PM -0400, Roger Merchberger wrote: > Kindof an offtopic question, but is there a "Master List" of IP's that send > spam regularly, with which I could use to update my tcprules deny list? RBL? > I really don't want to patch & rei

Spam IP master list?

Kindof an offtopic question, but is there a "Master List" of IP's that send spam regularly, with which I could use to update my tcprules deny list? I really don't want to patch & reinstall qmail with the RBL... (and it seems ORBS went away...) Besides, I'm really

Re: tcprules & is this list having trouble

On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 01:53:25AM +1000, arnie wrote: > Sorry about the intrusion but is the Qmail list having Mailer-Daemon trouble ? > I have been trying to send an important email to the list at "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > and I keep getting: > > Sorry. Your message

Re: tcprules & is this list having trouble

Roger Arnold wrote: Sorry about the intrusion but is the Qmail list having Mailer-Daemon trouble ? I have been trying to send an important email to the list at "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and I keep getting: Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to: test test (Mailbox or Conferen

.qmail files and list delivery

I'm having a problem getting an ezmlm list setup. I know that it has a seperate list, but I think this is a qmail configuration problem. Here is users/assign (yes, I ran qmail-newu): +:jjn:500:500:/home/jjn::: +soccer:soccer:514:514:/home/soccer::: =jjn:jjn:500:500:/home/jjn:::

Re: process status list - I'm clueless

On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 12:07:46PM -0700, Drew Hawn wrote: > Here's the output of ps -ax | grep qmail: > > 607 ?S 0:00 supervise qmail-send > 609 ?S 0:00 supervise qmail-smtpd > 613 ?S 0:00 qmail-send > 614 ?S 0:00 /usr/local/bin/multilo

process status list - I'm clueless

Here's the output of ps -ax | grep qmail: 607 ?S 0:00 supervise qmail-send 609 ?S 0:00 supervise qmail-smtpd 613 ?S 0:00 qmail-send 614 ?S 0:00 /usr/local/bin/multilog t s250 /var/log/qmail/qma 615 ?S 0:00 /usr/local/b

HELP: how to unscribe mailing list

Hi, I am sorry, can you tell me how to unsuscribe this mailing list. I have tried to find instruction but I have not found a way to do it. Thanks a lot, Hoang

French speaking list

Hi all, I've created a mailing list about qmail for French speaking users. See http://qmail.free.fr/ for the instructions. Cheers, Dj.

Re: "domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5)"

eader. It also doesn't care what you use as the envelope sender address. > Using Pine, when I try to send an email, I get the error message ["domain > isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5)"] #1 FAQ. Look for "selective relaying". > What the FAQ sai

"domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5)"

My computer is behind a home firewall/DHCP server. under /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts is my DHCP address. I would like to send mail out with a FROM address of my free-mail address. Using Pine, when I try to send an email, I get the error message repeated in the subject line. qmail was insta

Re: list got quite

--- Reboot is prevented by hardware failure: the mail disk super block has died. --- what operating system has a single superblock on it's filesystems? there should be as much superblocks as there are cylinder groups on a berkeley based fs. from the FFS/UFS manpage on freebsd-4.3-stable: ---

Re: list got quite

n. > > > > It was an electrical upgrade according to http://cr.yp.to/ > > If you get the messages of changes to the crypto web site, you get to > see an update when DJB adds the event description to his web page. > You won't get this until his machine is back up,

Re: list got quite

Bruno Wolff III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >If you get the messages of changes to the crypto web site, you get to >see an update when DJB adds the event description to his web page. >You won't get this until his machine is back up, but in this case I >knew not to expec

Re: list got quite

the messages of changes to the crypto web site, you get to see an update when DJB adds the event description to his web page. You won't get this until his machine is back up, but in this case I knew not to expect any list messages for about a day.

Re: list got quite

On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 04:48:44PM -0700, Graham H. wrote: > Wasn't just you. It seemed qmail was down. It was an electrical upgrade according to http://cr.yp.to/ Jörgen

Re: list got quite

Wasn't just you. It seemed qmail was down. -- Graham audit wrote: > Sorry, just haven't seen any messages in a few hr's and didn't know if it > was just me or not. >

list got quite

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Sorry, just haven't seen any messages in a few hr's and didn't know if it was just me or not. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 2.6.3ia Charset: noconv Comment: http://www.radiusnet.net iQCVAwUBOwzyn6yzESGmHGLJAQEQoQQAydFNSKsEALk3SUogzgC6b5lQCKk7VnsF 9f

Re: Digest list available?

ah thanks - Original Message - From: "tonix (Antonio Nati)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "alexus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 3:46 AM Subject: Re: Digest list available? > > A digest list will usually send

Re: Digest list available?

- Original Message - >From: "tonix (Antonio Nati)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 4:32 PM >Subject: Digest list available? > > > > > > Sorry to question something that probably has been already asked.

Re: Digest list available?

A digest list will usually send you an unique e-mail with all new questions and answers of the last day grouped together. That means to receive one or two (big) email instead of 50-80 email as I'm currently receiving. At 16/05/2001 16/05/2001 -0400, you wrote: >what's the diff i

Re: Digest list available?

what about using securepoints archive? www.msge.securepoint.com - Original Message - From: "tonix (Antonio Nati)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 4:32 PM Subject: Digest list available? > > Sorry to question some

Digest list available?

Sorry to question something that probably has been already asked... Would it be possible to setup a digest for this mailing list? Tonino

Re: Who is List Manager

Jason Kawaja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > --- Here are the ezmlm command addresses. Please keep this off the list. Everybody who can read (English) is able to get that help from ezmlm by himself. Anybody who is on the list at least mastered the subscription process. The unsubscript

Re: Who is List Manager

istrative requests automatically. Just send an empty note to any of these addresses: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Receive future messages sent to the mailing list. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Stop receiving messages. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Retrieve a copy of message 12345 from the archive.

Re: Who is List Manager

Thus said "Niles" on Mon, 14 May 2001 11:49:46 EDT: > Jim, > > Try sending mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I believe you mean [EMAIL PROTECTED] My guess, however, is that he isn't on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list... Andy -- [-

Re: Difficulties with 'long-term' list responders

* Patrick Starrenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010514 19:45]: > Dear Frank > > You know - I could hit the keyboard and write back a real flame e-mail *plonk* /pg -- Peter Green : Architekton Internet Services, LLC : [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- If you're a horse, and someone gets on you, and falls off,

Difficulties with 'long-term' list responders

s. If your MUA is unable to do so, complain to the MUA author Your sending client should add a date header..." Firstly I *explicitly* said in my first e-mail "The MUA stamps the message with the correct Date: field value" because I had read the discussion about that point

Re: Who is List Manager

ROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 11:10 AM > Subject: Who is List Manager > > >> Hello. >> >> Can the list manager for [EMAIL PROTECTED] please send me a direct >> email? Please? I cannot unsubscribe, even with a

Re: Who is List Manager

Jim, Try sending mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hope this helps.. Niles - Original Message - From: "Jim Darrough" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 11:10 AM Subject: Who is List Manager > Hello. > > Can the list manag

Who is List Manager

Hello. Can the list manager for [EMAIL PROTECTED] please send me a direct email? Please? I cannot unsubscribe, even with all the help the fine members of this reflector have given me. Thanks, Jim Darrough [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mailing list

* Karsten W Rohrbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ed lim([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.05.09 11:28:16 +: >> I need a mailing list to send to our millions of subscribers... I am >> already using ezmlm but I'm still open for suggestions on a much >> simpler or bet

Re: mailing list

ed lim([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.05.09 11:28:16 +: > Hi, > > I need a mailing list to send to our millions of subscribers... I am already >using ezmlm but I'm still open for suggestions on a much simpler or better one. ezmlm-idx with mysql support and the subscriber li

Sorry to all qmail list members

Hi All, I really apologise for all the noise I could do for my mistake in the list. Next time I will be more carefull. Sorry again, Pablo ___ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Messenger: Comunicación instantánea gratis con tus amigos - http

Re: mailing list

ed lim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I need a mailing list to send to our millions of subscribers... I am already > using ezmlm but I'm still open for suggestions on a much simpler or better > one. You're unlikely to get any suggestions here; most of the people

Re: mailing list

On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 11:28:16AM -0700, ed lim wrote: > Hi, > > I need a mailing list to send to our millions of subscribers... I am already >using ezmlm but I'm still open for suggestions on a much simpler or better one. Any specifics on what constitutes "simpler

mailing list

Hi,       I need a mailing list to send to our millions of subscribers... I am already using ezmlm but I'm still open for suggestions on a much simpler or better one.

RE: Using /users assign file with mailing list

Coley -Original Message- From: David Coley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 1:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Using /users assign file with mailing list I have a small problem with one of our accounts. We have a user account set up for one of our mailing lists (/home/vcp

Using /users assign file with mailing list

mailing list account... we want it to use the standard ezmlm .qmail file instead. However when I add: =vcpphelp:vcpphelp:501:501:/home/vcpphelp:-:: +vcpphelp-:vcpphelp:501:501:/home/vcpphelp:-:: to /var/qmail/users/assign qmail reports in the error logs: May 3 01:06:56 dev qmail: 988866416.131424

Re: Round Robin Distribution List

On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 12:10:52AM +0200, Fares Gianluca wrote: > >I would like to use a round robin distribution list. > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> should be forward all >incoming messages to some people using this simple rule: >the first message shoul

Round Robin Distribution List

smime.p7m

Re: Is qmail "best reserved for mailing list server purposes only"?

Russ Allbery([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.04.29 14:49:03 +: > q question <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > > Qmail is extremely network unfriendly and generates denial of service > > attacks on other mailservers in its enthusiasm to deliver as many > > messages as possible in a short period of ti

Re: Is qmail "best reserved for mailing list server purposes only"?

I appreciate your pointing this out. >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John R. Levine) >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Is qmail "best reserved for mailing list server purposes >only"? >Date: 30 Apr 2001 19:15:38 -0400 > > >One last not

Re: Is qmail "best reserved for mailing list server purposes only"?

Oleg Polyakov wrote: > > I'm not sure how qmail works if you are sending 100 messages > from server to another one. > Does it open 100 connections concurrently? it opens "maxconcurrency" connections. It doesn't have per-site concurrency limit, unles you patch it. It is reccommended, if you ar

Re: Is qmail "best reserved for mailing list server purposes only"?

Russ Allbery wrote: > Rather, it tries to bounce them and the bounce bounces as undeliverable. > The solution is for ORBS to stop probing systems from which no spam has > ever been sent and for which there is no reason to suspect a lack of > security. they were a lot easier to igore when they

Re: Is qmail "best reserved for mailing list server purposes only"?

--- "John R. Levine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Qmail backs off very well, but doesn't work all that well with > sendmail under heavy load. The problem is that sendmail keeps > accepting connections even when it doesn't have enough system > resources to accept mail, and tends to thrash to dea

Re: Is qmail "best reserved for mailing list server purposes only"?

>One last note on this thread. While rereading the FAQ, I came across this >which indicates qmail has brakes to keep from generating denial of service >attacks. > >http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/efficiency.html > >Does qmail back off from dead hosts? >Answer: Yes. qmail has three backoff features: ..

Re: Is qmail "best reserved for mailing list server purposes only"?

One last note on this thread. While rereading the FAQ, I came across this which indicates qmail has brakes to keep from generating denial of service attacks. http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/efficiency.html Does qmail back off from dead hosts? Answer: Yes. qmail has three backoff features: Each mess

Re: Is qmail "best reserved for mailing list server purposes only"?

suited to being a mailing list server? It seems to me that it would be especially UNsuitable for that task. Jason, I agree with you that there is no real distinction between list subscribers and regular mail recipients. You can get an equally high volume either way, and not all lists restrict the

Re: Is qmail "best reserved for mailing list server purposes only"?

servers in its enthusiasm to deliver as many messages as possible > in a short period of time. For this reason it is best reserved for mailing > list server purposes only." At the top of that page it says: 'Everything on this page is based on information supplied to ORBS by server admi

Re: Is qmail "best reserved for mailing list server purposes only"?

From: q question <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Qmail is > extremely network unfriendly and generates denial of service attacks on > other mailservers in its enthusiasm to deliver as many messages as possible > in a short period of time. For this reason it is best reserved for mai

Re: Is qmail "best reserved for mailing list server purposes only"?

that would have problems with all sorts of normal deliveries. > For this reason it is best reserved for mailing list server purposes > only." > Do you all agree with this opinion that qmail is "best reserved for > mailing list server purposes only"? No. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

Is qmail "best reserved for mailing list server purposes only"?

liver as many messages as possible in a short period of time. For this reason it is best reserved for mailing list server purposes only." Do you all agree with this opinion that qmail is "best reserved for mailing list server purposes only"? ___

cannot post question to list

hi,qmail list admin: i can not post question to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] i can receive list mail.

Re: RSS LIST

On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 04:09:05AM +0800, hongtao wrote: > >R = read > >T = the > >F = f*cking > >M = manual > > i wonder where is this file? This is just shorthand, an abbreviation, for the documentation in general. In this case, you will want to carefully read the man page for tcprules: $ man

Re: Re: RSS LIST

thank you for your help. althouth you read the RTFM in an underground way. >Now that is seriously clueless. > > >> >R = read >> >T = the >> >F = f*cking >> >M = manual >> >> i wonder where is this file? >> >> > > > >John Chapman >CNI Consulting >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >www.cniconsulting.com >817

RSS LIST

>R = read >T = the >F = f*cking >M = manual i wonder where is this file? > >- Original Message - >From: "hongtao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Johan Almqvist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Wednesday,

Re: Re: RSS LIST

R = read T = the F = f*cking M = manual - Original Message - From: "hongtao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Johan Almqvist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 3:29 PM Subject: Re: Re: RSS LIST > Dear Johan: &g

Re: Re: RSS LIST

Dear Johan: thank you very much! i have changed the /etc/tcp.smtp as you told me. what is RTFM? can you help me to test if 202.106.184.99 is open relay also? hongtao >* hongtao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010425 01:34]: >> *** /etc/tcp.smtp >> :deny,RELAYCLIENT="" #if no this line, all ip will be

Re: RSS LIST

hongtao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > *** /etc/tcp.smtp > :deny,RELAYCLIENT="" #if no this line, all ip will be allowed to relay > 202.106.184.99:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" As Johan noted, this is incorrect. You're misunderstanding how tcpserver controls access to your SMTP service; you can't have

Re: RSS LIST

* hongtao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010425 01:34]: > *** /etc/tcp.smtp > :deny,RELAYCLIENT="" #if no this line, all ip will be allowed to relay > 202.106.184.99:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" This is wrong. Should be: 202.106.184.99:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" :allow Note that the allow at the end doens't set RELAY

Re: RSS LIST

,RELAYCLIENT="" *** /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts nie-go.com staff.nie-go.com hongtao.com hongtao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > because an american use my mail server (qmail) to spam, > the ip of my mail server is now in the RSS list, > i have refused some ip to use ou

RE: RSS LIST

Logs? -Original Message- From: hongtao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 5:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RSS LIST Dear All: because an american use my mail server (qmail) to spam, the ip of my mail server is now in the RSS list, i have refused some ip

Re: RSS LIST

hongtao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > because an american use my mail server (qmail) to spam, > the ip of my mail server is now in the RSS list, > i have refused some ip to use our smtp to relay, if my smtp > server now is not open-relay smtp server. You've got it b

RSS LIST

Dear All: because an american use my mail server (qmail) to spam, the ip of my mail server is now in the RSS list, i have refused some ip to use our smtp to relay, if my smtp server now is not open-relay smtp server. who can help me in this aspect? thank you very much! hongtao

Re: It's not my list but ... (AV Bots)

At 03:44 PM 4/24/01, Frank Tegtmeyer wrote: >Todd Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On an ezmlm list, stripping MIME attachments is as simple as ... > >To be exact: that's only possible with ezmlm-idx. Yes, my bad. Todd

Re: It's not my list but ... (AV Bots)

Todd Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On an ezmlm list, stripping MIME attachments is as simple as ... To be exact: that's only possible with ezmlm-idx. Regards, Frank

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >